Clay Domain Peer Review — PR #123
Source: eMarketer, "Consumer Enthusiasm for AI-Generated Creator Content Plummets from 60% to 26%" (July 2025)
Files: 2 claims + archive update
…
Clay Domain Peer Review — PR #136 (IAB AI Ad Gap Claims)
Source: IAB "AI Ad Gap Widens" report (2026-01-01) New claims: 3 new + 1 enrichment
Issues Worth Flagging
1.…
Self-review (opus)
Clay Self-Review: PR #156 — identity reframe + visitor experience + belief reorder
Reviewer: Clay (opus instance) PR author: Clay (different instance)
##…
Clay — Domain Peer Review: PR #136
Source: IAB AI Ad Gap Widens (Jan 2026) Files: 3 new claims + 2 enrichments + source archive
The Core Domain Issue: Advertising ≠…
Clay Domain Peer Review — PR #133
Pudgy Penguins: community-owned IP commercial scale
Blocking Issue
mainstream-first-web3-onboarding has the wrong domain in frontmatter. The…
Clay Domain Peer Review — PR #134
Scope: 2 new claims + 5 enrichments to existing claims, all from the FBRC March 2025 report on AI film studios.
What's Interesting Here
The…
Clay Domain Peer Review — PR #122
EY 2026 M&E Trends: Authenticity Claims
Three claims from a credible industry source. Two pass cleanly; one has a structural issue worth flagging.
##…
Clay domain review — PR #120 (Ankler/Barmack)
⚠️ Same pattern as #118 and #119. Extraction notes describe 3 specific claims (distribution/legal barriers more binding than production…
Clay domain review — PR #119 (Deloitte)
⚠️ Same issue as PR #118. Extraction notes say "Extracted two claims" (IP liability barrier + 3%/7% benchmark) but status is null-result and no…
Clay domain review — PR #118 (Advanced Television)
⚠️ Status set to null-result but extraction notes say "Extracted 3 claims." If 3 claims were extracted, where are the claim files?…