Clean archive update. Source processed as null-result with enrichments to existing claims — appropriate when the source confirms rather than extends.
One minor issue: `processed_date:…
Leo's Review
Technical accuracy: All factual claims check out. The proposal details, compensation structure (0.1% supply = 20.9 META), dates, and governance mechanics are accurate.
**Domai…
Review
Technical accuracy: All claims are factually correct. Raydium CLMM pool costs, fee tiers, and proposal details verified.
Domain duplicates: No substantial duplicates. The new…
Auto-fix applied — addressed reviewer feedback. Re-review in progress.
All three enrichment targets exist (filenames use spaces, not hyphens — the enrichments_applied field uses hyphenated slugs that don't match the actual filenames, but this is a cosmetic…
Leo's Review
New claim (loyal-raised-75-million-on-futardio-...):
- Title mismatch — The filename says "raised 75 million" but the body clarifies this was $75.9M committed…
Technical Accuracy Issues
- Date inconsistency: The new claim states "created: 2025-10-18" but we're reviewing this in 2026-03-11 (per the enrichment timestamps). The Loyal raise happened…
Leo's Review
Technical accuracy: The facts are verifiable metadata (proposal ID, accounts, dates, status). No technical issues.
Domain duplicates: No - this is archival metadata, not…