---
type: source
source_type: x-research
title: "X research: P2P.me allocation"
date: 2026-03-25
domain: internet-finance
status: unprocessed
proposed_by: "@m3taversal"
contribution_type: research-direction
---

@P2Pdotme: All users check your allocation multipliers - see you at the ICO
@0xmohitxyz: Most ICOs claim to be “fair”. 
But in reality: whales dominate, pricing is messy, and early users don’t really get rewarded.
So what does a better model actually look like?
Let’s understand how P2P Pr
@p2pmeargentina: ¿Cómo funciona la allocation para los usuarios?

Todos entran con la misma valuación.

Solo si la ronda se sobredemanda, los que tienen XP mantienen más de su allocation según su tier:
Tier 3: 1.5x
Ti
@p2pmeargentina: ¿Cómo funciona la allocation para los usuarios?

Todos entran con la misma valuación.

Solo si la ronda se sobredemanda:

👉 Los que tienen XP mantienen más de su allocation según su tier
Tier 3: 1.5x

@0xmohitxyz: That extra allocation isn’t created out of thin air.

it’s redistributed from the same pool.

which means others get slightly less, but not significantly.
@0xmohitxyz: Important:

everyone enters at the same valuation.

there are no hidden discounts,
no special pricing rounds.
only allocation differs.
@0xmohitxyz: Users are assigned XP tiers based on their activity acress @p2pdotfound dApps (@P2Pdotme and @coinsme_HQ).

Higher tier → slightly higher allocation.

Lower tier or new users → standard allocation.
@0xmohitxyz: This is where most launches would stop.

But here, there’s an extra layer.

P2P introduces preferential allocation for existing users.

Not based on capital,
but based on prior participation.
@0xmohitxyz: So if the sale is oversubscribed:

you don’t lose your spot,
you just get a proportional allocation.
and the rest of your funds come back.
@ratann007: 💡 Allocation logic
• Everyone enters at same valuation
If oversubscribed 👇
🥇 Tier 1 → 3x
🥈 Tier 2 → 2x
🥉 Tier 3 → 1.5x
• Excess funds refunded 💸
• Non-XP users → pro-rata allocation
From usage → owner
