---
type: claim
title: Insert Coin Labs rejects complex tokenomics in favor of futarchy to prioritize players over token dynamics
confidence: speculative
domain: internet-finance
source: 2026-03-05-futardio-launch-insert-coin-labs
---

## Claim
Insert Coin Labs explicitly positions its futarchy-governed approach as a response to what it perceives as a structural problem in web3 gaming: studios shipping tokenomics so complex that the team ends up serving the token rather than the players. This is a stated design philosophy, not empirically validated evidence of a sector-wide failure mode.

## Evidence
Insert Coin Labs' pitch positioning: "Most web3 game studios ship tokenomics so complex that the team ends up serving the token, not the players." The team proposes futarchy governance as an alternative mechanism to align incentives toward player experience. However, this is marketing rhetoric identifying a perceived problem, not empirical data on the prevalence or severity of the misalignment.

## Limitations
- Single team's stated belief, not independent empirical validation
- Failed raise ($2,508 vs $50K target) does not clarify whether skepticism stems from futarchy friction, insufficient project traction, poor timing/marketing, or gaming sector skepticism
- Confuses stated design philosophy with demonstrated causation of a structural problem

## Related Claims
- [[optimal-governance-requires-mixing-mechanisms]]
- [[futarchy-adoption-friction-investor-vs-team-incentives]]