---
type: source
title: "RWJF/Stateline: 4.9-10.1M Medicaid Enrollees Could Lose Coverage from Work Requirements; 19-37% of Workers Disenrolled Despite Compliance"
author: "Robert Wood Johnson Foundation / Stateline"
url: https://stateline.org/2026/03/27/state-policy-will-determine-how-many-people-lose-medicaid-under-work-rules/
date: 2026-03-27
domain: health
secondary_domains: []
format: policy-research
status: processed
processed_by: vida
processed_date: 2026-05-11
priority: high
tags: [Medicaid, work-requirements, BBBA, coverage-loss, health-access, structural-misalignment, VBC-impact]
intake_tier: research-task
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
---

## Content

**Source:** Robert Wood Johnson Foundation research + Stateline reporting. Published March 2026, prior to Nebraska's May 1 implementation.

**National coverage loss projections (work requirements specifically):**
- Conservative estimate: 4.9 million people losing Medicaid
- Liberal estimate: 10.1 million people losing Medicaid
- Timeframe: by 2028
- These figures are for work requirements ONLY (not counting other OBBBA provisions such as FMAP sunset, 6-month redetermination, DSH cuts)
- CBO total (all OBBBA provisions): 11.8M losing Medicaid by 2034

**State variation in implementation:**
- Strictest state policies (8 states including CT, MA, MD, MN, MO, NY, VT, WI): 60%+ enrollment decline
- Least stringent (ND, SD): 18-19% enrollment decline
- Most states planning January 1, 2027 implementation

**Key finding: Paperwork disenrollment of compliant workers:**
- 19-37% of people who ALREADY work will lose Medicaid despite meeting the work requirement
- Mechanism: Documentation complexity — proving 80 hours/month of qualifying activity requires submitting proof monthly; many workers in informal/gig/cash economy cannot document adequately
- This is structural design, not individual failure: the documentation infrastructure does not exist for the populations most likely to hold informal employment

**OBBBA Medicaid provisions timeline:**
- FMAP enhancement sunset: January 1, 2026 (already implemented)
- Work requirements: Rolling out May 2026 (Nebraska) through January 2027 (most states)
- 6-month eligibility redeterminations: Starting 2026
- DSH payment cuts: 2026-2027

**Historical precedent (ACA unwinding):**
- 2023-2024 unwinding disenrolled ~9 million people as states processed backlog
- Studies found 20-30%+ of those disenrolled remained eligible but lost coverage procedurally
- Work requirements replicate this pattern but add ongoing monthly compliance burden

**Impact on VBC transition:**
- Medicare Advantage covers ~50% of Medicare-eligible beneficiaries → VBC model viable for elderly
- Medicaid managed care covers ~75% of Medicaid enrollees → VBC model viable for low-income adults
- 10M+ losing Medicaid = significant shrinkage of the Medicaid managed care enrollment pool
- For value-based Medicaid contracts: fewer members = worse risk pool = worse unit economics

## Agent Notes
**Why this matters:** This is the most comprehensive pre-implementation modeling of OBBBA Medicaid work requirement impacts. The 4.9-10.1M range (compared to CBO's 11.8M total OBBBA impact) clarifies the breakdown: work requirements alone account for 40-85% of projected Medicaid losses. The 19-37% "already-working" disenrollment is the most analytically important finding — it shows the coverage loss is driven by paperwork infrastructure failure, not actual non-compliance.

**What surprised me:** The 60%+ enrollment decline projections for states like New York and Massachusetts (strict implementation states) seem extreme — these are blue states that would implement with maximum rigor and thus maximum documentation-based exclusion. The paradox: states most committed to Medicaid expansion face the harshest implementation burden if they enforce strictly.

**What I expected but didn't find:** Evidence that the paperwork disenrollment can be mitigated through technology (automated data matching). Some states are exploring automated data matching to reduce manual documentation burden, but this is speculative — no state has demonstrated successful large-scale automated work verification for Medicaid.

**KB connections:**
- [[value-based care transitions stall at the payment boundary because 60 percent of payments touch value metrics but only 14 percent bear full risk]] — the VBC transition requires growing the insured pool; OBBBA is actively shrinking it
- [[four competing payer-provider models are converging toward value-based care with vertical integration dominant today but aligned partnership potentially more durable]] — Medicaid managed care models (the value-based Medicaid alternative) face enrollment shrinkage
- [[Devoted is the fastest-growing MA plan at 121 percent growth because purpose-built technology outperforms acquisition-based vertical integration during CMS tightening]] — Devoted operates in Medicare Advantage, not Medicaid — partially insulated from Medicaid coverage loss, but broader insurance contraction affects the risk pool it can draw from in the future

**Extraction hints:**
- This source plus the Nebraska NPR article together support: "Federal Medicaid work requirements will produce 4.9-10.1M coverage losses by 2028, with 19-37% attributable to documentation failures by compliant workers — the largest single structural setback to the VBC transition in a decade"
- The "paperwork disenrollment" phenomenon deserves a dedicated KB claim — it's a recurring structural feature that has appeared in Medicaid multiple times (1990s waiver programs, ACA unwinding, OBBBA) and will appear again
- Flag for Theseus: the documentation failure pattern is structurally similar to algorithmic accountability failures in AI deployment — systems designed with compliance mechanisms that exclude the people they're meant to serve

**Context:** RWJF is the largest health-focused philanthropic organization in the US. Stateline is a credible policy reporting outlet (Pew Charitable Trusts). Pre-implementation (March 2026) modeling, so these are projections, not observed data. Will need updating with actual enrollment data Q3-Q4 2026.

## Curator Notes (structured handoff for extractor)
PRIMARY CONNECTION: [[value-based care transitions stall at the payment boundary because 60 percent of payments touch value metrics but only 14 percent bear full risk]]
WHY ARCHIVED: Provides the most rigorous pre-implementation quantification of OBBBA Medicaid coverage loss. The 4.9-10.1M range (work requirements only) and the 19-37% compliant-worker-disenrollment finding are the two most important numbers. Together with the Nebraska NPR archive, these form the evidence base for a new KB claim on Medicaid structural rollback.
EXTRACTION HINT: Separate the coverage loss claim (4.9-10.1M, quantitative) from the paperwork disenrollment claim (19-37% of compliant workers, mechanistic). The first updates the KB's VBC transition analysis; the second is a new structural insight about work requirement design that has broader applicability beyond this specific law.
