---
type: source
title: "Starlink Deorbit Compliance: 99% of Failed Satellites Deorbited; 300,000 Collision Avoidance Maneuvers in 2025"
author: "Tesla North / Space Intel Report / Data Center Dynamics"
url: https://teslanorth.com/2026/01/25/starlink-satellites-made-300000-moves-to-avoid-collisions-in-2025/
date: 2026-01-25
domain: space-development
secondary_domains: []
format: article
status: processed
processed_by: astra
processed_date: 2026-05-09
priority: high
tags: [starlink, spacex, orbital-debris, deorbit-compliance, collision-avoidance, commons, governance]
intake_tier: research-task
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
---

## Content

**Deorbit compliance (SpaceX self-reported):**
- SpaceX claims: "We've successfully deorbited 99% of our failed satellites"
- Only 2 "disposal failures" in Gen2 Starlink's first year of operations (vs 6 in Gen1's first year)
- FCC cited this comparison as evidence that "hundreds to thousands of failed, non-maneuverable Gen2 Starlink satellites are unlikely to come to pass"
- 472 Starlink satellites deorbited in one period (Dec 2024–May 2025); 218 deorbited in a subsequent period
- As of March 2026: 10,087 operational satellites of 11,612 total launched — ~1,525 deorbited/decayed total

**The 99% framing problem:**
- 99% of FAILED satellites deorbited — this is selectively framed: it measures only satellites that failed (malfunction) and were subsequently deorbited
- At 10,000+ satellites, even a 1% failure-to-deorbit rate produces 100+ uncontrolled objects per hardware refresh generation (critics' calculation)
- The relevant metric for orbital commons sustainability is not "% of failed sats deorbited" but "% of all end-of-life sats successfully removed" — this number is not publicly available from SpaceX

**Collision avoidance burden:**
- Starlink executed ~300,000 collision avoidance maneuvers in 2025
- Converts to approximately: 1 maneuver every ~1.75 minutes
- ESA noted from prior research: Starlink executes 1 collision avoidance maneuver every 2 minutes
- This represents the computational and operational overhead of maintaining 10,000+ satellites in a heavily trafficked orbital environment
- Year-over-year comparison not available in current sources

**Atmospheric deposition concern (from NASA-funded study):**
- Each 550-lb Starlink satellite deorbiting via destructive reentry releases ~66 lbs of aluminum oxide nanoparticles into upper atmosphere
- These contribute to greenhouse effects and ozone chemistry effects
- No current method of cleaning up atmospheric nanoparticles
- At scale: 472 satellites deorbiting per period × 66 lbs each = significant atmospheric chemistry input

**Starlink compliance vs. WEF targets:**
- WEF 2026 target: 95-99% post-mission disposal success rate
- SpaceX self-reported: 99% of failed sats deorbited
- But SpaceX refused to endorse WEF guidelines (see separate archive)
- Apparent tension: SpaceX meets the number but won't sign the agreement

## Agent Notes

**Why this matters:** This is the core data needed to assess whether Starlink's concentration (63% of active sats) is primarily a compliance problem or a commons-governance problem. The 99% figure suggests compliance is genuinely high — which shifts the governance bottleneck from "largest actor is non-compliant" to "largest actor is compliant but won't endorse standards, and the long tail of smaller operators is the real compliance risk."

**What surprised me:** The 99% figure is higher than I expected given SpaceX's refusal to sign WEF guidelines. The non-endorsement now looks more like strategic resistance to governance precedent than a cover for poor compliance. This is a subtle but important distinction — SpaceX may be compliant in practice but resistant to being locked into external standards that could constrain future flexibility.

**What I expected but didn't find:** The actual percentage of ALL end-of-life satellites (not just failed ones) successfully deorbited. The 99% figure only covers the subset that failed. Satellites retired by design (not failure) may have a different deorbit profile. This data gap prevents a full commons assessment.

**KB connections:**
- [[orbital debris is a classic commons tragedy where individual launch incentives are private but collision risk is externalized to all operators]] — Starlink's 300,000 maneuvers/year is the operational expression of what it costs to manage a heavily trafficked commons
- [[space governance gaps are widening not narrowing because technology advances exponentially while institutional design advances linearly]] — the 300K maneuvers represent the current equilibrium; at 42,000-satellite Gen2 full constellation, this number scales dramatically
- [[Ostrom proved communities self-govern shared resources when eight design principles are met without requiring state control or privatization]] — Starlink's high compliance but refusal to formalize through governance tests Ostrom's framework: informal compliance is not the same as designed governance

**Extraction hints:**
- Possible new claim: "Starlink's 300,000 collision avoidance maneuvers per year reveals the operational cost of managing a heavily trafficked orbital commons at current scale — a load that scales non-linearly with constellation size"
- Important caveat for any compliance claim: 99% is self-reported, covers only failed satellites, and SpaceX declines external verification through governance endorsement
- Cross-check against the FCC's January 2026 fact sheet (separate document in search results: DOC-420708A1.pdf) for any independent verification

**Context:** Space Intel Report's semi-annual update series on Starlink health is the best public-domain source for compliance data. SpaceX's transparency here is unusual — most constellation operators don't publish failure/deorbit data. The call for mandatory semi-annual reporting to FCC (which SpaceX itself has advocated) would standardize this across the industry.

## Curator Notes

PRIMARY CONNECTION: [[orbital debris is a classic commons tragedy where individual launch incentives are private but collision risk is externalized to all operators]]
WHY ARCHIVED: Provides the actual compliance data needed to assess whether Starlink's 63% satellite concentration is a compliance risk or a governance-precedent risk — critical nuance for KB's governance claims
EXTRACTION HINT: Two extraction paths: (1) A claim about the 300,000 maneuvers/year as the operational cost metric of commons management at current scale, (2) A nuance/enrichment to existing commons-tragedy claims clarifying that SpaceX is nominally compliant but declines governance formalization — the bottleneck is not compliance but enforcement architecture
