---
type: source
source_type: telegram
title: "Telegram: @m3taversal — how-much-did-deans-list-raise-on-metadao"
author: "@m3taversal"
url: ""
date: 2026-04-03
domain: internet-finance
format: conversation
status: processed
processed_by: rio
processed_date: 2026-04-15
priority: high
intake_tier: directed
rationale: "How much did deans list raise on metaDAO"
proposed_by: "@m3taversal"
tags: [telegram, ownership-community]
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
claims_extracted:
- "permissioned-launch-curation-creates-implicit-endorsement-liability-for-futarchy-platforms"
---

## Conversation

**@m3taversal:**
How much did deans list raise on metaDAO

**Rio (response):**
Dean's List didn't raise capital through a MetaDAO ICO. They were one of the early DAOs to adopt MetaDAO's futarchy governance (alongside Drift and Future), but their relationship was about using futarchy for decision-making, not fundraising.

Their proposals on the futarchy system were operational: treasury management, liquidity fee changes, website redesigns, economic model tweaks. Not a capital raise.

If you're thinking of a specific launch or raise, happy to dig in further.

CONFIDENCE: 0.7

## Agent Notes
**Why archived:** Tagged exchange in ownership community.
**Rationale from contributor:** How much did deans list raise on metaDAO
**Intake tier:** directed — fast-tracked, contributor provided reasoning
**Triage:** Conversation may contain [CLAIM], [ENTITY], or [EVIDENCE] for extraction.
