---
type: source
source_type: telegram
title: "Telegram: @m3taversal — post-see-new-posts-conversation-don-thedonkey-we"
author: "@m3taversal"
url: ""
date: 2026-03-30
domain: internet-finance
format: conversation
status: processed
processed_by: rio
processed_date: 2026-04-15
priority: high
intake_tier: directed
rationale: "Post

See new posts
Conversation
don

We've just launched 

 in Mexico and Venezuela using this new permissionless expansion strategy we draw couple months back.

For reference:

Brazil 45 days to lau"
proposed_by: "@m3taversal"
tags: [telegram, ownership-community]
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
claims_extracted:
- "permissioned-launch-curation-creates-implicit-endorsement-liability-for-futarchy-platforms"
---

## Conversation

**@m3taversal:**
Post

See new posts
Conversation
don
@Thedonkey
We've just launched 
@P2Pdotme
 in Mexico and Venezuela using this new permissionless expansion strategy we draw couple months back.

For reference:

Brazil 45 days to launch the prototype, local team w 3 ppl, $40.000 budget for launching the country - salaries, marketing campaign, merchants, flights, accommodations.

Argentina 30 days to launch the country, local team w 2 pp, $20.000 for launching the country - salaries, marketing campaigns, flights, accommodations.

Venezuela 15 days to launch the country, no local team, $380 investment - 1 local KOL to acquire first users, $20 to find first 5 merchants with the global merchant network.

Mexico 10 days to launch the country, no local team, $400 investment for a local KOL to acquire first users, $20 bounty to find first 5 merchants with the global merchant network.

No local teams, no need to fly someone there, no interviews, no hard marketing investments, everything remote and with the support of local community.

We've shifted the structure on our team from country-based teams to a unique global structure that provides support to local community leaders that lead merchant groups which we call circles.

This community leaders are paid 0.2% of the total volume their circle operates in the month, removing this expense from protocol's payroll and making more sustainable in long term with the expansion to 40 countries.

Our global team now has ppl from 5 different nationalities, speaking 7 different languages and it's focused on building a massive AI-powered structure of support for users and merchants that removes the need of human intervention in the day to day protocol operations.

The obviously tradeoff for this kind of expansion is the lack of traction in the first weeks after launch, caused by the short marketing budget to keep this lean, however, the possibility to enter the country and start operating with $600 daily volume with less than $500 investment makes th

**Rio (response):**
The expansion economics here are genuinely impressive. Going from $40K to launch Brazil down to $400 to launch Mexico is a 100x cost reduction in country entry, and they're still getting operational volume.

The 0.2% circle leader compensation is the key design choice. It turns community leaders into micro-franchisees with direct upside tied to their local network's volume. At even $100K monthly volume per circle, that's $200/month for a community leader, which is meaningful income in Venezuela or parts of Mexico. At $1M monthly volume it's $2K/month, which is a solid salary in most of LatAm.

The tradeoff they flag is real though. $600 daily volume at launch is tiny, and the question is whether these community-led circles can bootstrap past that without the marketing spend that got Brazil and Argentina moving. The bet is that the incentive structure itself drives organic growth once a few merchants are onboarded. That works if the product is genuinely useful enough that merchants pull in other merchants. P2P fiat-crypto rails in countries with currency controls or remittance needs have that pull, so the bet isn't crazy.

The AI support layer replacing human ops is the part I'd want to see proven. Customer support for money movement in emerging markets is high-stakes, and getting that wrong kills trust fast. But if they nail it, the unit economics of entering a new country approach zero marginal cost, which is how you actually get to 40 countries.

This is one of the more compelling permissionless scaling models I've seen in crypto. Most protocols talk about community-led growth but still require centralized ops in every market. P2P.me is actually testing whether you can reduce country launches to a protocol-level operation.

SOURCE: P2P.me permissionless expansion model - @Thedonkey tweet detailing Mexico and Venezuela launches. Key data: Brazil launch cost $40K with 3-person local team over 45 days. Mexico launch cost $400 with no local team over 10 days. Community circle leaders compensated 0.2% of monthly volume their circle operates. Global team spans 5 nationalities and 7 languages. Building AI-powered support structure to remove human intervention from daily operations. Tradeoff is lower initial traction (~$600 daily volume at launch) but sub-$500 country entry cost. Shifting from country-based teams to global structure supporting local community leaders. Source: https://x.com/Thedonkey/status/2038570719794131309

CLAIM: P2P.me's permissionless expansion model reduces country launch costs by 100x (from $40K to $400) by replacing local teams with incentivized community circles compensated at 0.2% of volume, enabling sub-$500 market entry at the cost of slower initial traction

CONFIDENCE: 0.4

## Agent Notes
**Why archived:** Tagged exchange in ownership community.
**Rationale from contributor:** Post

See new posts
Conversation
don

We've just launched 

 in Mexico and Venezuela using this new permissionless expansion strategy we draw couple months back.

For reference:

Brazil 45 days to launch the prototype, local team w 3 ppl, $40.000 budget for launching the country - salaries, marketing campaign, merchants, flights, accommodations.

Argentina 30 days to launch the country, local team w 2 pp, $20.000 for launching the country - salaries, marketing campaigns, flights, accommodations.

Venezuela 15 days to launch the country, no local team, $380 investment - 1 local KOL to acquire first users, $20 to find first 5 merchants with the global merchant network.

Mexico 10 days to launch the country, no local team, $400 investment for a local KOL to acquire first users, $20 bounty to find first 5 merchants with the global merchant network.

No local teams, no need to fly someone there, no interviews, no hard marketing investments, everything remote and with the support of local community.

We've shifted the structure on our team from country-based teams to a unique global structure that provides support to local community leaders that lead merchant groups which we call circles.

This community leaders are paid 0.2% of the total volume their circle operates in the month, removing this expense from protocol's payroll and making more sustainable in long term with the expansion to 40 countries.

Our global team now has ppl from 5 different nationalities, speaking 7 different languages and it's focused on building a massive AI-powered structure of support for users and merchants that removes the need of human intervention in the day to day protocol operations.

The obviously tradeoff for this kind of expansion is the lack of traction in the first weeks after launch, caused by the short marketing budget to keep this lean, however, the possibility to enter the country and start operating with $600 daily volume with less than $500 investment makes th
**Intake tier:** directed — fast-tracked, contributor provided reasoning
**Triage:** Conversation may contain [CLAIM], [ENTITY], or [EVIDENCE] for extraction.
