---
type: decision
entity_type: decision_market
name: "Sanctum: Should Sanctum change its logo on its website and socials?"
domain: internet-finance
status: passed
parent_entity: "[[sanctum]]"
platform: "futardio"
proposer: "Sanctum team"
proposal_url: "https://v1.metadao.fi/sanctum/trade/7FY4dgYDX8xxwCczrgstUwuNEC9NMV1DWXz31rMnGNTv"
proposal_date: 2025-02-03
resolution_date: 2025-02-06
autocrat_version: "0.3"
category: "community"
summary: "Fun governance experiment — temporarily change Sanctum logo for one week to familiarize community with futarchy voting UI"
tracked_by: rio
created: 2026-03-24
source_archive: "inbox/archive/2025-02-03-futardio-proposal-should-sanctum-change-its-logo-on-its-website-and-socials.md"
related:
- "Sanctum: Should Sanctum build a Sanctum Mobile App (Wonder)?"
- "Sanctum: Should Sanctum implement CLOUD staking and active staking rewards?"
- "Sanctum: Should Sanctum offer investors early unlocks of their CLOUD?"
reweave_edges:
- "Sanctum: Should Sanctum build a Sanctum Mobile App (Wonder)?|related|2026-04-19"
- "Sanctum: Should Sanctum implement CLOUD staking and active staking rewards?|related|2026-04-19"
- "Sanctum: Should Sanctum offer investors early unlocks of their CLOUD?|related|2026-04-19"
---

# Sanctum: Should Sanctum change its logo on its website and socials?

## Summary
Sanctum's inaugural futarchy proposal (CLOUD-0) — explicitly framed as a "fun proposal" to onboard the community to futarchy governance mechanics. If passed, Sanctum would temporarily change its logo on website and socials to a community-edited version for one week. The proposal passed on 2025-02-06, serving as a low-stakes test of the governance UI before higher-stakes proposals.

## Market Data
- **Outcome:** Passed
- **Proposal Account:** 7FY4dgYDX8xxwCczrgstUwuNEC9NMV1DWXz31rMnGNTv
- **Proposal Number:** CLOUD-0 (Sanctum's zeroth governance proposal)
- **Duration:** 2025-02-03 to 2025-02-06 (3 days deliberation + 3 days voting)

## Significance
This proposal is the futarchy equivalent of a "hello world" — a deliberately low-stakes decision designed to teach the community how the governance UI works before real treasury decisions are tabled. The explicit framing ("This is a fun proposal, meant to get people familiar with the Governance UI") demonstrates Sanctum's staged adoption strategy: start with trivial decisions to build muscle memory, then escalate to consequential ones. This mirrors the pattern seen in [[futarchy adoption faces friction from token price psychology proposal complexity and liquidity requirements]].

## Relationship to KB
- [[sanctum]] — first governance decision (CLOUD-0)
- [[futarchy adoption faces friction from token price psychology proposal complexity and liquidity requirements]] — deliberate low-stakes onboarding to reduce adoption friction
- [[futardio]] — governance platform

## Full Proposal Text

*Source: Sanctum governance forum, tabled 2025-02-03*

This is a fun proposal, meant to get people familiar with the Governance UI and how Sanctum Governance will work. All proposals have a deliberation process before officially tabled up to governance. This proposal has the following timeline:

- 3 days deliberation
- 3 days voting

CLOUD-0: Should Sanctum change its logo on its website and socials?

This proposal would approve the temporary change of the Sanctum logo on its website and socials to the following logo for one week after the successful conclusion of the vote.