# EU AI Act Omnibus

**Type:** Legislative amendment package  
**Status:** Active negotiation (as of May 2026)  
**Domain:** AI governance  
**Jurisdiction:** European Union

## Overview

The EU AI Act Omnibus is a legislative package attempting to postpone enforcement deadlines in the original EU AI Act. The Omnibus emerged after the original Act's timelines proved technically infeasible for industry compliance.

## Key Provisions

**Proposed postponement dates (agreed by both Council and Parliament as of April 28, 2026):**
- December 2, 2027: Standalone high-risk AI systems
- August 2, 2028: AI embedded in Annex I products (medical devices, machinery, connected vehicles)

**Blocking issue:** Conformity-assessment architecture. Parliament wants sectoral law (existing medical device, machinery regulations) to govern AI embedded in Annex I products. Council insists on horizontal AI Act governance across all domains.

## Timeline

- **2026-04-28** — Second political trilogue ended without agreement after ~12 hours. Both sides converged on postponement dates but failed on Annex I governance architecture.
- **2026-05-13** — Third trilogue scheduled. Final opportunity to pass postponement before August 2, 2026 original enforcement deadline becomes legally active.
- **2026-07-01** — Lithuanian Presidency takes over if May 13 fails.
- **2026-08-02** — Original EU AI Act high-risk AI compliance deadline. Becomes enforceable if Omnibus not passed and published in Official Journal before this date.

## Enforcement Stakes

If August 2, 2026 deadline activates:
- Mandatory reporting, conformity assessments, and registration requirements for high-risk AI systems
- Domains: biometrics, critical infrastructure, education, employment, essential services
- Would be first mandatory AI governance enforcement anywhere globally
- Military AI systems explicitly excluded from scope

## Governance Mechanism

If May 13 fails and August 2 passes without legislative postponement, Commission would issue transitional guidance—administrative pre-emption rather than legislative deferral. This represents a Mode 5 variant: administrative guidance substituting for failed legislative retreat.

## Industry Response

As of late April 2026, compliance advisors (Modulos, Bird & Bird) shifted guidance from "plan against assumed extension" to "treat August 2 as reality." Organizations planning to comply with December 2027 timeline if agreement reached, but preparing for August 2 activation if not.

## Sources

- IAPP analysis of April 28 trilogue
- Bird & Bird EU AI Act compliance advisory
- The Next Web coverage
- Ropes & Gray legal analysis