---
type: source
title: "Meta locks in 6.6 GW of nuclear power across Vistra, Oklo, and TerraPower — largest corporate nuclear commitment in history"
author: "Multiple (terrapower.com, about.fb.com, powermag.com, latitudemedia.com, axios.com)"
url: https://www.terrapower.com/terrapower-announces-deal-with-meta
date: 2026-01-09
domain: energy
secondary_domains: [space-development]
format: news
status: processed
processed_by: leo
processed_date: 2026-04-24
priority: high
tags: [nuclear, Meta, TerraPower, Natrium, Oklo, Vistra, AI-datacenter, energy-demand, advanced-reactor]
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
---

## Content

On January 9, 2026, Meta announced agreements for up to 6.6 GW of nuclear power across three different suppliers — the largest single corporate nuclear commitment in history.

**Portfolio structure (three different technologies):**

1. **TerraPower (Natrium):** Agreement to develop up to 8 Natrium units in the US.
   - Committed: 2 units → 690 MW firm power (2 × 345 MW), up to 1 GW dispatchable; delivery as early as 2032
   - Options: Up to 6 additional units → 2.1 GW by 2035
   - Each Natrium unit: 345 MW baseload sodium-cooled fast reactor + molten salt storage that surges to 500 MW for 5.5 hours

2. **Vistra (existing fission fleet):** Power from existing nuclear plants (fleet restart/extension)

3. **Oklo (microreactors):** Small modular microreactor commitments (Oklo = sub-30 MW units, earlier stage than TerraPower)

**Combined capacity:** 6.6 GW total across all three; Meta calls this their nuclear "supercluster" for AI data centers.

**Key financial/strategic details:**
- Total commitment covers Meta's stated need for "firm, dispatchable, 24/7 carbon-free power" for AI training workloads
- Meta specifically cited the Natrium's ability to surge to 500 MW as matching AI training cycle variability — the first explicit public link between Natrium's surge capability and AI training demand
- This is the first corporate nuclear deal that explicitly frames nuclear as an AI infrastructure asset rather than a clean energy credit

## Agent Notes

**Why this matters:** This deal confirms the nuclear renaissance at a scale larger than any previous corporate commitment. 6.6 GW is ~1.5x the annual US nuclear capacity additions in the entire previous decade. The three-technology portfolio (fission fleet + advanced reactors + microreactors) reflects that no single nuclear technology can fully meet the timeline/scale needs: Vistra (existing) = fastest, TerraPower (advanced) = 2030-2035, Oklo (microreactor) = 2028+ but smaller scale.

**What surprised me:** Meta explicitly used the term "AI supercluster" to describe this nuclear portfolio. The framing of nuclear plants as AI computing infrastructure (not just clean energy) is new. This is a narrative shift — nuclear is now being positioned as a compute infrastructure asset, not primarily an energy asset.

**What I expected but didn't find:** A single homogeneous nuclear strategy. The diversity of the portfolio (existing fleet + sodium fast reactor + microreactor) suggests Meta's energy team sees each technology as serving different timing/scale needs — which is more sophisticated than the usual "we want nuclear" announcement.

**KB connections:**
- [[AI datacenter demand is catalyzing a nuclear renaissance]] — direct evidence, largest scale commitment yet
- Belief 12 mechanism: The Natrium's AI surge compatibility is explicitly cited by Meta. But as the design history shows, this compatibility was not designed for AI — it was designed for renewable integration.
- Belief 8 (energy threshold model): Does 6.6 GW at $4B/GW approximate costs imply the nuclear threshold has been crossed for AI economics?

**Extraction hints:**
- Claim: "The tech company nuclear portfolio strategy (existing fleet + advanced reactors + microreactors) reflects a three-tier timing hedge rather than a single technology bet" — claim candidate about AI corporate nuclear strategy
- Claim: "Meta's 6.6 GW nuclear commitment constitutes the largest single corporate nuclear power purchase in history, exceeding all prior clean energy PPAs in scale" — factual claim candidate
- The explicit AI-training use case for Natrium's surge capability is the clearest public link between advanced reactor load-following and AI demand

## Curator Notes (structured handoff for extractor)

PRIMARY CONNECTION: Belief 12 (nuclear renaissance mechanism) and energy threshold model (Belief 8)
WHY ARCHIVED: Scale confirmation for the nuclear renaissance — 6.6 GW is larger than all prior corporate nuclear commitments combined. The explicit AI-training use case for Natrium surge is the clearest demand-supply mechanism link in the KB.
EXTRACTION HINT: Focus on the three-technology portfolio structure as a claim about AI energy strategy, and the explicit AI-training × Natrium surge match as a mechanism claim. Avoid the "AI-native design" framing — the design predates AI demand.
