---
type: claim
domain: energy
description: "CFS/MIT 20 Tesla REBCO magnet demo in 2021 means 16x confinement pressure at 2x field strength, enabling SPARC-sized devices to match ITER plasma performance at a fraction of cost and construction time"
confidence: likely
source: "Astra, fusion power landscape research February 2026; MIT News, CFS, DOE Milestone validation September 2025"
created: 2026-03-20
secondary_domains: ["space-development"]
challenged_by:
- REBCO tape supply chain scaling is unproven at fleet levels — global production is limited and fusion-grade tape requires stringent quality control
supports:
- CFS HTS magnet manufacturing is a platform business that generates revenue from competitors and adjacent industries making CFS profitable regardless of which fusion approach wins
reweave_edges:
- CFS HTS magnet manufacturing is a platform business that generates revenue from competitors and adjacent industries making CFS profitable regardless of which fusion approach wins|supports|2026-04-17
sourced_from:
- inbox/archive/2026-02-17-astra-fusion-power-landscape.md
---

# High-temperature superconducting magnets collapse tokamak economics because magnetic confinement scales as B to the fourth power making compact fusion devices viable for the first time

The September 2021 CFS/MIT demonstration of a sustained 20 Tesla magnetic field from a large-scale REBCO (rare-earth barium copper oxide) high-temperature superconducting magnet is arguably the single most consequential hardware breakthrough in private fusion history. DOE independently validated performance in September 2025, awarding CFS its largest Milestone award ($8M).

Traditional tokamaks (ITER, JET) use low-temperature superconductors operating at 4 Kelvin and topping out around 5-6 Tesla. HTS magnets operate at 20 Kelvin — still cryogenic but far more practical — and reach 20+ Tesla. Since magnetic confinement pressure scales as B^4, doubling field strength from 6T to 12T gives 16x the confinement pressure. This means the tokamak can be dramatically smaller for equivalent plasma performance.

SPARC uses these magnets at 12.2 Tesla toroidal field. Its 1.85m major radius is roughly the size of existing mid-scale tokamaks, yet it aims to achieve Q>2 (with physics models predicting Q~11) — matching ITER's target plasma performance from a device costing billions less that takes years rather than decades to build.

The implication for fusion economics is profound: smaller machines mean less material, shorter construction timelines, faster iteration cycles, and the ability to build multiple experimental devices rather than betting everything on one multi-decade megaproject. This is the tokamak equivalent of the reusable rocket — it doesn't change the physics, but it changes the economics enough to enable private capital participation.

## Challenges

REBCO tape manufacturing is still scaling. Global production capacity is ~5,000+ km/year across 15 manufacturers, and costs need to drop toward $10-20/kA-m. Whether the supply chain can support multiple simultaneous fusion builds in the 2030s is an open question. Competitors (Tokamak Energy, Energy Singularity) also pursue HTS magnets — CFS's moat is in engineering integration and manufacturing scale, not the materials themselves.

---

Relevant Notes:
- [[Starship achieving routine operations at sub-100 dollars per kg is the single largest enabling condition for the entire space industrial economy]] — structural parallel: HTS magnets are to fusion what Starship is to space — the cost-curve collapse enabling private capital
- [[launch cost reduction is the keystone variable that unlocks every downstream space industry at specific price thresholds]] — HTS magnets are the keystone variable for fusion economics, analogous to launch cost for space
- [[knowledge embodiment lag means technology is available decades before organizations learn to use it optimally creating a productivity paradox]] — HTS magnets existed before CFS; the breakthrough was engineering them at fusion scale

Topics:
- energy systems