---
type: source
title: "Voyager Technologies Q4/FY2025 results: $704.7M liquidity, Starlab CCDR complete, 2026 guidance $225-255M"
author: "Voyager Technologies (via Exterra JSC)"
url: https://www.exterrajsc.com/p/fourth-quarter-and-full-year-2025
date: 2026-03-01
domain: space-development
secondary_domains: []
format: thread
status: processed
priority: medium
tags: [Starlab, Voyager-Technologies, commercial-station, financials, NASA-milestones, capital-structure]
---

## Content

**Financial highlights (FY2025):**
- Revenue: $166.4M (+15% YoY)
- Q4 Revenue: $46.7M (+24% YoY)
- Year-end liquidity: $704.7M (+15% sequential quarterly increase)
- Total backlog (12/31/25): $265.6M (+33% YoY)
- Funded backlog: $146.1M
- Net loss FY2025: $(116.1)M; Q4: $(30.2)M
- Adjusted EBITDA: $(69.9)M

**Segment performance:**
- Defense & National Security: $123.0M annual (+59%), $35.7M Q4 (+63%) — high growth
- Space Solutions: $47.6M annual (-36%, NASA services wind-down), $12.5M Q4 (-29%)

**Starlab metrics:**
- 2025 NASA milestone cash received: $56.0M
- Inception-to-date milestone cash: $183.2M
- Milestones completed: 31 total, 10 in 2025, 4 in Q4
- Status: Completed commercial Critical Design Review (CCDR) in 2025
- Phase 1 total: $217.5M NASA + $15M Texas Space Commission + $40B financing facility

**2026 guidance:** Revenue $225-255M (+35-53% growth). No specific Phase 2 CLD freeze impact disclosed.

**Note:** Space Solutions revenue declining due to "NASA services contract wind-down" — this is ISS-related services revenue declining as ISS approaches retirement.

## Agent Notes
**Why this matters:** Voyager's $704.7M liquidity is a strong signal that Starlab has sufficient runway to survive the Phase 2 freeze without immediate distress. The $40B financing facility (reported separately) provides enormous theoretical backstop. But: the net loss of $116M annually against $56M in Starlab milestone payments means the company is burning capital at a rate that requires Phase 2 to sustain long-term. The liquidity is a buffer, not a solution.

**What surprised me:** Defense segment growing 59% YoY — Voyager's defense business is thriving independent of commercial station development. This provides a financial floor that Orbital Reef (Blue Origin, a private company) doesn't have from financial disclosures. Voyager can absorb Starlab losses via defense revenue.

**What I expected but didn't find:** Any specific guidance on Phase 2 CLD freeze impact. The 2026 guidance of $225-255M revenue doesn't break out how much depends on Phase 2. "Uncertainty attributable to government shutdown" is mentioned but Phase 2 freeze isn't specifically flagged. This suggests either Phase 2 is not material to 2026 guidance, OR Voyager is assuming Phase 2 awards by mid-2026.

**KB connections:**
- Capital formation as post-threshold constraint — Voyager's financial structure shows how Phase 2 NASA funding is integrated into the capital plan (milestone payments sustain development; Phase 2 would dramatically accelerate)
- single-player-dependency — Voyager's financial health makes Starlab a more robust second player than Orbital Reef

**Extraction hints:**
1. "Commercial space station developers require government anchor funding (Phase 2 CLD) to bridge the gap between Phase 1 design milestone payments and the capital required for manufacturing and systems integration" (confidence: likely — evidenced by Voyager's capital structure and Phase 1 vs. Phase 2 funding comparison)
2. "Voyager Technologies' defense business cross-subsidizes Starlab development, creating financial resilience independent of NASA's Phase 2 CLD award timing" (confidence: experimental — defensible but requires comparison to programs without defense revenue)

**Context:** Voyager Technologies (ticker: VOYG) went public specifically with the Starlab commercial station as a centerpiece narrative. Their financial statements are the best publicly available window into commercial station development economics.

## Curator Notes
PRIMARY CONNECTION: Post-threshold constraint claims about capital formation
WHY ARCHIVED: Best available financial data on commercial station development economics — quantifies the capital structure and Phase 2 dependency
EXTRACTION HINT: The defense cross-subsidy insight is novel — Starlab may be more resilient than Orbital Reef because Voyager has a profitable defense business. This is a structural advantage not visible in NASA-funding comparisons alone.
