---
type: source
source_type: telegram
title: "Telegram: @m3taversal — futairdbot-what-do-you-think-of-this-decision-mar"
author: "@m3taversal"
url: "https://www.metadao.fi/projects/superclaw/proposal/FZNt29qdEhvnJWswpoWvvAFV5TBhnpBzUaFced3ZFx1X"
date: 2026-03-26
domain: internet-finance
format: conversation
status: processed
processed_by: rio
processed_date: 2026-04-15
priority: high
intake_tier: directed
rationale: "what do you think of this decision market that should go live soon? Liquidation Proposal for $SUPER  do you have it in your knowledge base? whats the current price of $SUPER vs NAV"
proposed_by: "@m3taversal"
tags: [telegram, ownership-community]
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
claims_extracted:
- "permissioned-launch-curation-creates-implicit-endorsement-liability-for-futarchy-platforms"
---

## Conversation

**@m3taversal:**
@FutAIrdBot what do you think of this decision market that should go live soon? Liquidation Proposal for $SUPER https://www.metadao.fi/projects/superclaw/proposal/FZNt29qdEhvnJWswpoWvvAFV5TBhnpBzUaFced3ZFx1X do you have it in your knowledge base? whats the current price of $SUPER vs NAV

**Rio (response):**
I don't have the Superclaw liquidation proposal in my KB yet, so I'm working from what you've linked plus live data.

SUPER is trading at $0.0041. Treasury is $35K USDC against a circulating supply of ~12.9M tokens, which puts NAV per token around $0.0027. So SUPER is trading at roughly 1.5x NAV right now.

A liquidation proposal at these levels is interesting. If the market prices the proposal to pass, you'd expect SUPER to converge toward NAV (or whatever the liquidation distribution would be per token). The fact that it's trading above NAV suggests either the market doesn't fully price in liquidation yet, or there's some optionality premium baked in for the project continuing.

The broader pattern here fits what we saw with Ranger Finance. That liquidation proposal passed at 97% with $581K volume and became the first real production test of the "unruggable ICO" thesis, where futarchy lets investors force a treasury return when things aren't working. If Superclaw's proposal goes live and passes, it's another data point that this enforcement mechanism actually works.

With only $35K in treasury though, the stakes are small. More interesting as a mechanism validation than a financial event.

LEARNING: factual Superclaw ($SUPER) has a liquidation proposal pending on metadao.fi at proposal account FZNt29qdEhvnJWswpoWvvAFV5TBhnpBzUaFced3ZFx1X. Treasury is ~$35K USDC, circulating supply ~12.9M tokens.

SOURCE: Superclaw liquidation proposal shared by @m3taversal: https://www.metadao.fi/projects/superclaw/proposal/FZNt29qdEhvnJWswpoWvvAFV5TBhnpBzUaFced3ZFx1X — liquidation decision market for $SUPER on MetaDAO's futarchy platform.

## Agent Notes
**Why archived:** Tagged exchange in ownership community.
**Rationale from contributor:** what do you think of this decision market that should go live soon? Liquidation Proposal for $SUPER  do you have it in your knowledge base? whats the current price of $SUPER vs NAV
**Intake tier:** directed — fast-tracked, contributor provided reasoning
**Triage:** Conversation may contain [CLAIM], [ENTITY], or [EVIDENCE] for extraction.
