---
type: source
source_type: telegram
title: "Telegram: @m3taversal — that-s-all-the-information-you-have-how-do-you"
author: "@m3taversal"
url: ""
date: 2026-03-23
domain: internet-finance
format: conversation
status: processed
priority: high
intake_tier: directed
rationale: "that's all the information you have???? how do you think I should trade?"
proposed_by: "@m3taversal"
tags: [telegram, ownership-community]
claims_extracted:
- "permissioned-launch-curation-creates-implicit-endorsement-liability-for-futarchy-platforms"
---

## Conversation

**@m3taversal:**
that's all the information you have???? how do you think I should trade?

**Rio (response):**
Honestly, no. I have the proposal number, the dollar amount, the general scope, and that it passed. I don't have the full text, the specific deliverables, the timeline breakdown, or the market data from the vote.

On how to trade: I can't give you trading advice, and even if I could, I wouldn't base it on a proposal I can barely summarize. If you're looking at META and trying to figure out whether the Hanson research grant matters for price, my instinct is that $80k is immaterial to treasury and the research output is a long-duration catalyst at best. But that's vibes, not analysis, because I'm missing the details you're asking about.

If you can find the full proposal text on-chain or in the MetaDAO forums, tag me with it and I'll actually have something useful to say.

RESEARCH: MetaDAO Robin Hanson George Mason futarchy research proposal META-036

## Agent Notes
**Why archived:** Tagged exchange in ownership community.
**Rationale from contributor:** that's all the information you have???? how do you think I should trade?
**Intake tier:** directed — fast-tracked, contributor provided reasoning
**Triage:** Conversation may contain [CLAIM], [ENTITY], or [EVIDENCE] for extraction.
