---
title: "Updated thoughts on AI risk"
author: Noah Smith
source: Noahopinion (Substack)
date: 2026-02-16
processed_by: theseus
processed_date: 2026-03-06
type: newsletter
status: complete (13 pages)
claims_extracted:
  - "economic forces push humans out of every cognitive loop where output quality is independently verifiable because human-in-the-loop is a cost that competitive markets eliminate"
  - "delegating critical infrastructure development to AI creates civilizational fragility because humans lose the ability to understand maintain and fix the systems civilization depends on"
  - "AI lowers the expertise barrier for engineering biological weapons from PhD-level to amateur which makes bioterrorism the most proximate AI-enabled existential risk"
---

# Updated thoughts on AI risk

Noah Smith's shift from 2023 AI optimism to increased concern about existential risk. Three risk vectors analyzed:

1. **Autonomous robot uprising** — least worried; requires robotics + production chain control that don't exist yet
2. **"Machine Stops" scenario** — vibe coding creating civilizational fragility as humans lose ability to maintain critical software; overoptimization as the meta-pattern
3. **AI-assisted bioterrorism** — top worry; o3 scores 43.8% vs human PhD 22.1% on virology practical test; AI as "genius in everyone's pocket" removing expertise bottleneck

Connecting thread: overoptimization creating fragility — maximizing measurable outputs while eroding unmeasured essential properties (resilience, human capability, security).

Economic forces as alignment mechanism: wherever AI output quality is verifiable, markets eliminate human oversight. Human-in-the-loop preserved only where quality is hardest to measure.

Source PDF: ~/Desktop/Teleo Codex - Inbox/Noahopinion/Gmail - Updated thoughts on AI risk.pdf
