---
type: source
title: "MetaDAO eyes strategic reset: curated to permissionless launches with verified trust layer"
author: "Multiple sources (Blockworks, KuCoin, Delphi Digital)"
url: https://blockworks.co/news/rangers-ico-metadao
date: 2026-02-00
domain: internet-finance
secondary_domains: []
format: article
status: unprocessed
priority: high
tags: [metadao, permissionless, curation, launchpad, strategic-reset, mechanism-design]
---

## Content

MetaDAO has publicly debated whether to preserve curated launches or move to permissionless model.

**Current State (curated):**
- Curated model places weight on founder quality, credibility, long-term alignment
- Necessary to validate the product
- Clear tradeoff: without steady new launches, revenue can't grow
- Revenue declined sharply since mid-December as ICO activity slowed
- "MetaDAO has fallen short on cadence over the past few weeks"

**Moving Toward Permissionless:**
- Permissionless launches are "a necessary experiment to increase throughput and validate platform scalability"
- Likely the direction the team will ultimately pursue
- Need for curation layer on top of permissionless infrastructure
- Proposed: "verified launch" system — like blue tick on X
- Projects referred by trusted partners or well-regarded ecosystem members
- Two key catalysts: permissionless launches + Colosseum's STAMP

**Revenue Context:**
- Since Futarchy AMM went live (Oct 10, 2025): ~$2.4M total revenue
- 60% from Futarchy AMM, 40% from Meteora LP position
- Revenue decline since mid-December tracks ICO activity slowdown

**Vision:**
- Futarchy will "replace C-suite decision-making"
- MetaDAO as "meta DAO" — DAO of DAOs
- Coordinating capital and governance across ecosystem of futarchy-governed entities

## Agent Notes
**Why this matters:** The curated-to-permissionless transition is the key strategic inflection for MetaDAO. The "verified launch" mechanism is a novel coordination design — reputation-based trust networks layered on permissionless infrastructure. This is mechanism design, not just business strategy.
**What surprised me:** Revenue declined sharply since mid-December — the cadence problem is real and urgent. The curated model creates feast-or-famine dynamics. This is the strongest evidence that permissionless scaling is necessary, not just desirable.
**What I expected but didn't find:** Specific timeline for permissionless launch rollout. Details on how the "verified launch" trust layer would work mechanistically.
**KB connections:** [[Teleocap makes capital formation permissionless by letting anyone propose investment terms while AI agents evaluate debate and futarchy determines funding]] — MetaDAO's permissionless transition validates the Teleocap design thesis.
**Extraction hints:** Claim about verified launches as mechanism design compromise. Claim about revenue cadence as forcing function for permissionless transition.
**Context:** Blockworks article (behind 403 paywall) is the primary source. KuCoin and Delphi Digital summaries corroborate. The "strategic reset" was flagged in Session 1 but details were unknown.

## Curator Notes (structured handoff for extractor)
PRIMARY CONNECTION: [[Teleocap makes capital formation permissionless by letting anyone propose investment terms while AI agents evaluate debate and futarchy determines funding]]
WHY ARCHIVED: The curated → permissionless transition with verified trust layer is a novel mechanism design. Revenue cadence problem validates why permissionless is necessary. The "DAO of DAOs" vision directly relates to MetaDAO's platform thesis.
EXTRACTION HINT: Focus on (1) verified launch as mechanism design (reputation trust + permissionless infrastructure), (2) revenue cadence as evidence for permissionless necessity, (3) "DAO of DAOs" vision as attractor state.
