---
type: source
title: "Futardio: Should Sanctum change its logo on its website and socials?"
author: "futard.io"
url: "https://www.futard.io/proposal/7FY4dgYDX8xxwCczrgstUwuNEC9NMV1DWXz31rMnGNTv"
date: 2025-02-03
domain: internet-finance
format: data
status: unprocessed
tags: [futardio, metadao, futarchy, solana, governance]
event_type: proposal
processed_by: rio
processed_date: 2025-02-03
enrichments_applied: ["futarchy-governed-permissionless-launches-require-brand-separation-to-manage-reputational-liability-because-failed-projects-on-a-curated-platform-damage-the-platforms-credibility.md", "MetaDAOs-Autocrat-program-implements-futarchy-through-conditional-token-markets-where-proposals-create-parallel-pass-and-fail-universes-settled-by-time-weighted-average-price-over-a-three-day-window.md", "MetaDAO-is-the-futarchy-launchpad-on-Solana-where-projects-raise-capital-through-unruggable-ICOs-governed-by-conditional-markets-creating-the-first-platform-for-ownership-coins-at-scale.md"]
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
extraction_notes: "This source documents a live futarchy governance event but contains no novel claims. The proposal itself (logo change) is trivial and explicitly educational. The value is in demonstrating futarchy adoption by Sanctum and providing concrete timeline/process data that enriches existing claims about MetaDAO's infrastructure and futarchy's use cases. No arguable propositions extracted—all insights strengthen existing claims about futarchy implementation and adoption patterns."
---

## Proposal Details
- Project: Sanctum
- Proposal: Should Sanctum change its logo on its website and socials?
- Status: Passed
- Created: 2025-02-03
- URL: https://www.futard.io/proposal/7FY4dgYDX8xxwCczrgstUwuNEC9NMV1DWXz31rMnGNTv
- Description: This proposal would approve the temporary change of the Sanctum logo on its website and socials to the following logo for one week after the successful conclusion of the vote
- Categories: {'category': 'Governance'}
- Discussion: https://research.sanctum.so/t/cloud-0-should-sanctum-change-the-logo-on-its-website-and-socials/1229

## Summary

### 🎯 Key Points
The proposal seeks to temporarily change the Sanctum logo on its website and social media for one week following a successful vote, with a deliberation period of 3 days and a voting period of 3 days.

### 📊 Impact Analysis
#### 👥 Stakeholder Impact
This change may engage the community and increase participation in the governance process.

#### 📈 Upside Potential
A fresh logo could enhance brand visibility and attract attention to Sanctum's activities.

#### 📉 Risk Factors
Temporary branding changes may confuse existing users or dilute brand recognition.

## Content

![image](https://canada1.discourse-cdn.com/flex003/uploads/sanctum/original/1X/924b212858387c7e3a78444a757445b4b26b16ce.png)

This is a fun proposal, meant to get people familiar with the Governance UI and how Sanctum Governance will work. All proposals have a deliberation process before officially tabled up to governance. This proposal has the following timeline:

- 3 days deliberation
- 3 days voting

CLOUD-0: Should Sanctum change its logo on its website and socials?
This proposal would approve the temporary change of the Sanctum logo on its website and socials to the following logo for one week after the successful conclusion of the vote:

edited logo per CW

![image](https://canada1.discourse-cdn.com/flex003/uploads/sanctum/original/1X/7b209dd624d64f61309b5cf05e5ba4d062027fbd.png)

## Raw Data

- Proposal account: `7FY4dgYDX8xxwCczrgstUwuNEC9NMV1DWXz31rMnGNTv`
- Proposal number: 1
- DAO account: `5n61x4BeVvvRMcYBMaorhu1MaZDViYw6HghE8gwLCvPR`
- Proposer: `proPaC9tVZEsmgDtNhx15e7nSpoojtPD3H9h4GqSqB2`
- Autocrat version: 0.3
- Completed: 2025-02-06
- Ended: 2025-02-06


## Key Facts
- Sanctum CLOUD-0 proposal passed (2025-02-03 to 2025-02-06)
- Proposal used 3-day deliberation + 3-day voting timeline
- Proposal account: 7FY4dgYDX8xxwCczrgstUwuNEC9NMV1DWXz31rMnGNTv
- Used Autocrat version 0.3
- Temporary logo change for one week post-vote
