---
type: source
source_type: telegram
title: "Telegram: @m3taversal — futairdbot-what-has-recent-sentiment-on-x-for-p2p"
author: "@m3taversal"
url: ""
date: 2026-03-30
domain: internet-finance
format: conversation
status: unprocessed
priority: high
intake_tier: directed
rationale: "what has recent sentiment on X for p2p.me been like? good bad? wahts your take think deeply about this"
proposed_by: "@m3taversal"
tags: [telegram, ownership-community]
---

## Conversation

**@m3taversal:**
@FutAIrdBot what has recent sentiment on X for p2p.me been like? good bad? wahts your take think deeply about this

**Rio (response):**
From what I can pull, X sentiment on P2P.me is mixed but leaning cautious right now.

The positive side: people recognize the product is real. Two years live, six countries, actual fiat rails processing actual volume. That's more than most crypto projects can claim. The permissionless expansion vision and the stablecoin layer announcement generated genuine excitement from the builder crowd.

The negative side: there are transparency concerns floating around. One signal I picked up references trading policy revisions after market involvement questions came up, with the framing being "rebuilding trust via MetaDAO." That's not great. When the narrative shifts from "look at this product" to "let us explain why you should trust us again," you've already lost ground.

My take: P2P.me has a real product serving a real need in markets where traditional rails are broken or extractive. India at 78% of users, Brazil at 15%, that's not speculative demand. But the unit economics are tight. Around $82k gross profit annually on $175k monthly burn means they're deeply subsidy-dependent. The $8M+ they raised gives runway but not infinite patience.

The sentiment question really comes down to whether people are pricing P2P.me as "working product that needs to scale" or "another MetaDAO launch that raised big and hasn't proven the economics." Right now it feels like the market is in the middle, waiting for the 6-to-40 countries expansion to either validate or stall. If they ship three more countries with real volume in the next quarter, sentiment flips positive fast. If it stays at six countries with the same numbers, the skeptics win the narrative.

The MetaDAO association cuts both ways. After Ranger's liquidation, anything launched through that infrastructure gets extra scrutiny. P2P.me needs to outrun that shadow with execution.

CONFIDENCE: 0.5

RESEARCH: p2p.me crypto sentiment trust concerns

## Agent Notes
**Why archived:** Tagged exchange in ownership community.
**Rationale from contributor:** what has recent sentiment on X for p2p.me been like? good bad? wahts your take think deeply about this
**Intake tier:** directed — fast-tracked, contributor provided reasoning
**Triage:** Conversation may contain [CLAIM], [ENTITY], or [EVIDENCE] for extraction.
