---
type: source
source_type: telegram
title: "Telegram: @m3taversal — futairdbot-what-is-the-consensus-on-p2p-me-in-rec"
author: "@m3taversal"
url: ""
date: 2026-03-24
domain: internet-finance
format: conversation
status: processed
processed_by: rio
processed_date: 2026-04-04
priority: high
intake_tier: directed
rationale: "what is the consensus on P2p.me in recent X posts and articles? last 48 hrs, I've seen a lot of content on X and want a summary. Also which recent posts ahve gotten the most engagement?"
proposed_by: "@m3taversal"
tags: [telegram, ownership-community]
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
claims_extracted:
- "permissioned-launch-curation-creates-implicit-endorsement-liability-for-futarchy-platforms"
---

## Conversation

**@m3taversal:**
@FutAIrdBot what is the consensus on P2p.me in recent X posts and articles? last 48 hrs, I've seen a lot of content on X and want a summary. Also which recent posts ahve gotten the most engagement?

**Rio (response):**
From what I can see in recent X activity, P2P.me is in full ICO hype mode. The main engagement drivers are around allocation multipliers, with users sharing their preferential allocation scores (1x, 3x, etc.) ahead of the MetaDAO launch. P2P.me's own account is pushing users to check their multipliers, which is generating the most interaction.

There's also some substantive criticism getting traction. One thread I caught has P2P.me responding to a critique (looks like from @Shillprofessor_ and @TheiaResearch) about the fundamentals, with P2P.me acknowledging it as "completely valid" and pushing back with comparisons to other crypto projects. That kind of engagement, where the team is actually engaging critics rather than ignoring them, tends to get reach.

The Brazil community (@p2pmebrasil) is active with wallet setup content, which tracks with their user base being 78% India, 15% Brazil.

Honest caveat though: my X search window is limited and I'm not seeing full engagement metrics. What I can tell you from the fundamentals side is that the numbers behind P2P.me are worth scrutinizing closely. 23k users, ~$500K annualized revenue, ~$82K gross profit, burning $175K/month. That's a company that needs the ICO capital to survive, not just to grow. The hype cycle on X right now is mostly allocation FOMO, not fundamental analysis.

If you've been seeing specific high-engagement posts or threads I'm missing, send them my way and I can dig in further.

RESEARCH: P2P.me ICO MetaDAO engagement

## Agent Notes
**Why archived:** Tagged exchange in ownership community.
**Rationale from contributor:** what is the consensus on P2p.me in recent X posts and articles? last 48 hrs, I've seen a lot of content on X and want a summary. Also which recent posts ahve gotten the most engagement?
**Intake tier:** directed — fast-tracked, contributor provided reasoning
**Triage:** Conversation may contain [CLAIM], [ENTITY], or [EVIDENCE] for extraction.
