---
type: entity
entity_type: company
subtype: ownership-coin
name: "MetaDAO"
domain: internet-finance
handles: ["@MetaDAOProject"]
website: https://metadao.fi
status: active
tracked_by: rio
created: 2026-03-11
last_updated: 2026-04-05
founded: 2023-01-01
founders: ["[[proph3t]]"]
category: "Capital formation platform using futarchy (Solana)"
stage: growth
key_metrics:
  meta_price: "~$3.78 (March 2026)"
  market_cap: "~$85.7M"
  ecosystem_market_cap: "$219M total ($69M non-META)"
  total_raised: "$33M+ across 10 curated ICOs (~$390M committed, 95% refunded via pro-rata)"
  total_revenue: "$3.1M+ (Q4 2025: $2.51M — 54% Futarchy AMM, 46% Meteora LP)"
  total_equity: "$16.5M (up from $4M in Q3 2025)"
  runway: "15+ quarters at ~$783K/quarter burn"
  curated_launches: "10 ownership coin launches"
  futarchic_amm_lp_share: "~20% of each project's token supply"
  proposal_volume: "$3.6M Q4 2025 (up from $205K in Q3)"
competitors: ["[[jupiter-lfg]]", "[[umia]]", "[[pump-fun]]"]
built_on: ["Solana"]
tags: ["futarchy", "decision-markets", "ownership-coins", "capital-formation", "launchpad"]
initial_token_price_usd: 0.001
monthly_allowance_usd: 240000
chain:
  token_mint: "METAwkXcqyXKy1AtsSgJ8JiUHwGCafnZL38n3vYmeta"
  network: solana
  market_cap_usd: null
  price_usd: null
  circulating_supply: null
  total_supply: null
  treasury_multisig: "BfzJzFUeE54zv6Q2QdAZR4yx7UXuYRsfkeeirrRcxDvk"
  treasury_multisig_usd: null
  lp_pools:
    - dex: futarchy-amm
      address: "CUPoiqkK4hxyCiJcLC4yE9AtJP1MoV1vFV2vx3jqwWeS"
  equity_value_usd: null
  data_updated: null
---

# MetaDAO

## Overview

Capital formation platform on Solana that uses futarchy to govern the full lifecycle of ownership coins — from launch pricing through treasury management to liquidation enforcement. Projects raise capital through curated ICOs where conditional markets set price discovery, investors get on-chain protection through futarchy-governed liquidation rights, and the whole structure sits inside a Cayman SPC + Marshall Islands DAO LLC legal framework.

MetaDAO started as a governance-as-a-service protocol (Drift, Dean's List, Sanctum, ORE, coal all adopted its Autocrat mechanism for DAO governance). That business line still exists but capital formation is now the primary focus — enabling companies to raise money, creating ownership coins, and providing legal structuring for on-chain ownership and futarchy.

## Core Products

**Curated ICOs (Ownership Coin Launches)**: MetaDAO's primary business. Projects apply, get selected, and raise capital through an ICO mechanism where conditional markets provide price discovery. Investors commit capital; oversubscription gets pro-rata'd. Treasuries are held on-chain with futarchy governance. If a team materially misrepresents, futarchy can vote to liquidate and return treasury to holders — the "unruggable ICO" mechanism. Updated from uncapped pro-rata to unruggable ICO format in February 2026.

**Autocrat**: The governance engine. Conditional token markets where proposals create parallel pass/fail universes settled by time-weighted average price (TWAP) over a three-day window. ~$3.8M cumulative trading volume across 37+ governance proposals. Anti-spam stake required to propose.

**Futarchic AMM**: Purpose-built AMM for decision market trading. No fees for external LPs — all fees go to the protocol. ~20% of each project's token supply is in the Futarchic AMM LP. LP cannot be withdrawn during active markets. $300M volume processed, $1.5M in fees generated.

**Governance-as-a-Service**: Secondary business line. Protocols adopt MetaDAO's Autocrat for their own DAO governance without going through the ICO process. Current clients: Drift (7 proposals), Dean's List (8), Sanctum (6), ORE (4), coal (4), Omnipair (4).

**Legal Structuring**: Cayman SPC + Marshall Islands DAO LLC framework for ownership coin projects. Creates regulatory defensibility — the structural separation of capital raise from investment decision is designed to survive Howey test scrutiny.

## Ownership Coin Launches

These are the 10 projects that launched through MetaDAO's curated ICO process, in chronological order:

| # | Project | Ticker | Entity | Status |
|---|---------|--------|--------|--------|
| 1 | mtnCapital | $MTN | [[mtncapital]] | Liquidated (~Sep 2025) |
| 2 | OmniPair | $OMFG | [[omnipair]] | Active |
| 3 | Umbra | $UMBRA | [[umbra-privacy-protocol]] | Active |
| 4 | Avici | $AVICI | [[avici]] | Active |
| 5 | Loyal | $LOYAL | [[loyal]] | Active |
| 6 | ZKFG | $ZKFG | [[zkfg]] | Active |
| 7 | Paystream | $PAYS | [[paystream]] | Active |
| 8 | Solomon Labs | $SOLO | [[solomon]] | Active |
| 9 | Ranger | $RNGR | [[ranger-protocol]] | Liquidated (Mar 2026) |
| 10 | P2P.me | $P2P | [[p2p-me]] | Complete (Mar 2026) |

**Key patterns:**
- mtnCapital was the first ownership coin launch and the first to be liquidated (~September 2025), establishing the enforcement precedent 6 months before Ranger
- Early ICOs had extreme oversubscription (Umbra 207x, Loyal 152x) — more capital wanted in than slots available
- Ranger was the highest-profile liquidation — $5.04M USDC returned to holders after documented material misrepresentation. 97% market support for liquidation.
- P2P.me was the most recent curated ICO (March 2026), backed by Multicoin + Coinbase Ventures
- Hurupay attempted a $3M raise in February 2026 but failed to reach minimum — first ICO failure, all capital refunded
- Two successful liquidations (mtnCapital, Ranger) demonstrate the enforcement mechanism works as designed

## Competitive Position

MetaDAO created a new category in crypto capital formation. No other platform combines market-based price discovery, on-chain investor protection, and legal structuring in one stack.

**Capital formation tiers:**

| Tier | Platform | Curation | Investor Protection | Price Discovery |
|------|----------|----------|-------------------|-----------------|
| Permissionless | Pump.fun | None | None | Bonding curve |
| Community-curated | Jupiter LFG | Community vote | None | Sentiment |
| **Futarchy-governed** | **MetaDAO** | **Team-selected + market-validated** | **Futarchy liquidation** | **Conditional markets** |
| Institutional | VCs / CoinList | VC-selected | Legal contracts | Private negotiation |

**By competitive front:**

*For deal flow (projects choosing where to launch):*
- **Jupiter LFG** — big distribution via Jupiter's Solana user base, community vote selection, but no post-launch governance or investor protection. Projects choosing Jupiter LFG get wider reach; projects choosing MetaDAO get legal structure and governance infrastructure.
- **Pump.fun** — massive throughput but zero curation and zero accountability. Competes more directly with [[futardio]] (both permissionless) than with MetaDAO's curated track.
- **VCs** — private, fast, opaque pricing, but connections and credibility. MetaDAO's value prop against the VC route: public market pricing, wider investor access, and no equity dilution to intermediaries.

*For the futarchy mechanism:*
- **[[umia]]** — Futarchy platform on Base (Ethereum L2) using Paradigm's Quantum Markets. Pre-launch as of early 2026. First direct cross-chain competitor implementing the same mechanism category. Deep Ethereum Foundation connections.
- **Prediction markets** (Polymarket, Kalshi) validate that conditional markets work at scale but serve a different use case (forecasting vs governance). Polymarket's $200B+ annualized volume proves the mechanism; MetaDAO applies it to capital allocation.

*For governance-as-a-service (secondary business):*
- **Snapshot** — token voting, free, widely adopted, but no conditional market mechanism
- **Tally** — on-chain governance, Ethereum-focused
- **Realms** — Solana-native governance, simpler than futarchy

**Structural advantages:**
- The Futarchic AMM is purpose-built; no existing AMM can replicate conditional token market settlement
- Two successful liquidations (mtnCapital, Ranger) create empirical credibility no competitor can claim
- Legal structuring via Cayman SPC creates regulatory defensibility
- Robin Hanson (inventor of futarchy) as advisor creates a theory-practice feedback loop

**Key vulnerability:** Depends on ownership coin quality. Ranger liquidation and Trove collapse damaged near-term credibility despite enforcement mechanism working as designed. The committed-to-raised ratio declining from 200x to ~1x on recent launches may signal cooling demand or market maturation.

## Current State
- **Financial**: $85.7M market cap, $219M ecosystem market cap ($69M non-META). Total revenue $3.1M+ (Q4 2025 alone: $2.51M). Total equity $16.5M, 15+ quarters runway.
- **Ecosystem**: 10 curated ownership coin launches + governance-as-a-service for 5 protocols + permissionless launches via [[futardio]]
- **Treasury**: Active management via futarchy proposals. Omnibus proposal migrated ~90% of META liquidity into Futarchy AMM and burned ~60K META.
- **Known limitation**: Limited trading volume in uncontested decisions — when community consensus is obvious, conditional markets add little information.

## Timeline

### Protocol History (2023-2025)
- **2023** — MetaDAO founded by Proph3t
- **2023-11** — First proposal (LST Vote Market) passed
- **2023-12** — Autocrat v0.1 deployed
- **2024-01** — AMM program approved to replace CLOB markets
- **2024-03** — Burn 99.3% META supply; develop FaaS; migrate to Autocrat v0.2; appoint BDF3M
- **2024-05** — Convex founder compensation approved
- **2024-06** — $1.5M fundraise approved; BDF3M term expired
- **2024-08** — Futardio memecoin launchpad concept rejected (reputational risk); services agreement approved
- **2024-10** — Hired Advaith Sekharan as founding engineer
- **2025-01** — Rejected Theia's discount OTC; approved Theia's premium OTC
- **2025-02** — Hired Robin Hanson as advisor; approved launchpad release
- **2025-08** — META token migration

### Ownership Coin Launch Era (2025-present)
- **2025-H2** — mtnCapital launches (first ownership coin), later liquidated (~Sep 2025). OmniPair launches.
- **2025-10** — Umbra, Avici, Loyal, ZKFG, PAYS launch in rapid succession. Massive oversubscription.
- **2025-11** — SOLO launch
- **2025-Q4** — First operating profitability: $2.51M fee revenue. Ecosystem grew from 2 to 10 protocols. Total equity $4M → $16.5M.
- **2026-01** — Ranger launch ($6M raise). Token peaked at TGE, fell 74-90%.
- **2026-02** — Hurupay ICO fails (first failure). VC discount OTC rejected by futarchy (16% META surge). Mechanism updated to unruggable ICO. Futardio permissionless launch explosion begins.
- **2026-03** — Ranger liquidation passed (97% support, ~$5M returned). P2P.me ICO launched. Omnibus migration proposal passed. Hanson GMU research proposal active.

## Decision Markets

MetaDAO has 37 recorded governance decisions spanning 2023-2026. For the full index with takeaways, see [[maps/metadao-decision-markets]].

**Most significant:**
- **Burn 99.3% META** (2024-03) — Community-proposed radical supply reduction. Changed MetaDAO's entire token economics.
- **BDF3M appointment** (2024-03) — Futarchy chose benevolent dictators to resolve execution bottleneck. Novel governance experiment.
- **Futardio concept rejected then approved** (2024-08 → 2025-02) — Market rejected a one-line proposal, approved the same concept 3 months later with full specification. Demonstrates futarchy's quality filtering.
- **Robin Hanson hire** (2025-02) — Futarchy protocol hires the inventor of futarchy.
- **VC discount OTC rejection** (2026-02) — Market rejected extractive VC deal; 16% price surge followed.
- **Ranger liquidation** (2026-03) — First enforcement action on a major project. 97% support, $5M returned. Proof the unruggable mechanism works.

## Investment Thesis

MetaDAO is the platform bet on futarchy-governed capital formation. If ownership coins prove to be a better fundraising mechanism than traditional token launches — offering real investor protection, market-based pricing, and legal structure — MetaDAO is the infrastructure layer that captures value from every project in the ecosystem.

Current evidence: the enforcement mechanism works (two successful liquidations), demand exists (10 launches with early extreme oversubscription), and the platform generates real revenue ($2.51M in Q4 2025 alone). Open questions: whether demand sustains as oversubscription declines, whether the governance-as-a-service revenue can scale alongside capital formation, and whether Umia's Ethereum implementation creates meaningful competitive pressure.

**Thesis status:** ACTIVE

## Key Metrics to Track
- Number and quality of curated ownership coin launches per quarter
- Committed-to-raised ratio on new launches (trending from 200x → 1x — cooling or maturing?)
- Curated ICO success rate (projects still active vs liquidated/abandoned)
- Futarchic AMM fee revenue growth
- Governance-as-a-service client count
- Ecosystem token aggregate market cap
- Umia launch timing and traction (competitive threat)

## Relationship to KB
- [[MetaDAO is the futarchy launchpad on Solana where projects raise capital through unruggable ICOs governed by conditional markets creating the first platform for ownership coins at scale]] — core claim
- [[MetaDAOs Autocrat program implements futarchy through conditional token markets where proposals create parallel pass and fail universes settled by time-weighted average price over a three-day window]] — mechanism
- [[MetaDAOs futarchy implementation shows limited trading volume in uncontested decisions]] — known limitation
- [[futarchy-governed liquidation is the enforcement mechanism that makes unruggable ICOs credible because investors can force full treasury return when teams materially misrepresent]] — enforcement
- [[futarchy-governed permissionless launches require brand separation to manage reputational liability because failed projects on a curated platform damage the platforms credibility]] — brand separation rationale
- [[MetaDAO oversubscription is rational capital cycling under pro-rata not governance validation]] — oversubscription mechanics
- [[Living Capital vehicles likely fail the Howey test for securities classification because the structural separation of capital raise from investment decision eliminates the efforts of others prong]] — legal structure

---

Relevant Entities:
- [[proph3t]] — founder
- [[futardio]] — permissionless launch platform (separate brand)
- [[umia]] — cross-chain competitor (Base/Ethereum)
- [[omnipair]] — ecosystem launch (#2, $OMFG)
- [[mtncapital]] — first launch, first liquidation
- [[ranger-protocol]] — second liquidation, enforcement precedent
- [[p2p-me]] — most recent curated ICO
- [[superclaw]] — largest Futardio permissionless raise

Topics:
- [[maps/internet finance and decision markets]]
- [[maps/metadao-decision-markets]]
