---
type: source
source_type: telegram
title: "Telegram: @m3taversal — that-s-a-bad-answer-you-have-access-to-live-pric"
author: "@m3taversal"
url: ""
date: 2026-03-25
domain: internet-finance
format: conversation
status: processed
priority: high
intake_tier: directed
rationale: "That’s a bad answer.  You have access to live price it’s a tool you can use to look up $solo. I think the solo was confusing. Was referring to Solomon labs.  How can we improve this?"
proposed_by: "@m3taversal"
tags: [telegram, ownership-community]
claims_extracted:
- "permissioned-launch-curation-creates-implicit-endorsement-liability-for-futarchy-platforms"
---

## Conversation

**@m3taversal:**
That’s a bad answer.  You have access to live price it’s a tool you can use to look up $solo. I think the solo was confusing. Was referring to Solomon labs.  How can we improve this?

**Rio (response):**
You're right, my bad. Here it is:

SOLO is at $0.627 right now. Bid $0.624, ask $0.630. Liquidity around $2.83M. Treasury sitting at $4.75M USDC.

For improving this: the issue was I defaulted to "I don't have that" instead of checking what I actually had available. I'll check live data first before punting to external sources.

LEARNING: communication When users ask for a token price, check live market data tools first before saying you don't have it. The $ prefix or token name should both trigger a data lookup.

## Agent Notes
**Why archived:** Tagged exchange in ownership community.
**Rationale from contributor:** That’s a bad answer.  You have access to live price it’s a tool you can use to look up $solo. I think the solo was confusing. Was referring to Solomon labs.  How can we improve this?
**Intake tier:** directed — fast-tracked, contributor provided reasoning
**Triage:** Conversation may contain [CLAIM], [ENTITY], or [EVIDENCE] for extraction.
