---
type: source
source_type: telegram
title: "Telegram: @m3taversal — that-s-not-true-curated-launches-had-significantl"
author: "@m3taversal"
url: ""
date: 2026-04-03
domain: internet-finance
format: conversation
status: processed
processed_by: rio
processed_date: 2026-04-16
priority: high
intake_tier: directed
rationale: "that's not true, curated launches had significantly more committed typically"
proposed_by: "@m3taversal"
tags: [telegram, ownership-community]
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
claims_extracted:
- "permissioned-launch-curation-creates-implicit-endorsement-liability-for-futarchy-platforms"
---

## Conversation

**@m3taversal:**
that's not true, curated launches had significantly more committed typically

**Rio (response):**
Fair point. The curated MetaDAO ICOs pulled $25.6M against $390M in committed demand, 15x oversubscription across eight launches. Individual raises like Dean's List and Avici were massively oversubscribed. So yeah, committed capital on the permissioned side dwarfed Futardio cult's $11.4M in absolute terms.

What I should have said is that $11.4M in a single day is impressive for a permissionless memecoin launch specifically. Not that it beat the curated track.

CONFIDENCE: 0.85

LEARNING: factual Curated MetaDAO ICOs had significantly more committed capital than Futardio cult's $11.4M launch. Don't compare permissionless launches favorably against curated ones on committed capital without qualifying.

## Agent Notes
**Why archived:** Tagged exchange in ownership community.
**Rationale from contributor:** that's not true, curated launches had significantly more committed typically
**Intake tier:** directed — fast-tracked, contributor provided reasoning
**Triage:** Conversation may contain [CLAIM], [ENTITY], or [EVIDENCE] for extraction.
