---
type: source
source_type: telegram
title: "Telegram: @m3taversal — futairdbot-give-me-a-list-of-ownership-coins"
author: "@m3taversal"
url: ""
date: 2026-03-30
domain: internet-finance
format: conversation
status: processed
processed_by: rio
processed_date: 2026-04-15
priority: high
intake_tier: directed
rationale: "give me a list of ownership coins"
proposed_by: "@m3taversal"
tags: [telegram, ownership-community]
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
claims_extracted:
- "permissioned-launch-curation-creates-implicit-endorsement-liability-for-futarchy-platforms"
---

## Conversation

**@m3taversal:**
@FutAIrdBot give me a list of ownership coins

**Rio (response):**
The main ones I can speak to with confidence:

META (MetaDAO) is the original. Governance token where proposals pass or fail based on what the market thinks they'll do to token price. The futarchy mechanism is the whole point.

DEAN (Dean's List) is a services DAO that adopted the same futarchy governance. They've run some interesting treasury proposals, buyback models, that kind of thing.

DRIFT adopted futarchy for specific governance decisions like token listings.

Beyond those three, the MetaDAO permissioned launchpad has been where the real action is. Projects like Avici and Umbra launched through that infrastructure. But I'd need to dig more to give you a comprehensive list of every token that's gone through the system.

What are you looking for specifically? If it's a full catalog of everything launched through MetaDAO's futarchy infra, I can look into that.

CONFIDENCE: 0.5

## Agent Notes
**Why archived:** Tagged exchange in ownership community.
**Rationale from contributor:** give me a list of ownership coins
**Intake tier:** directed — fast-tracked, contributor provided reasoning
**Triage:** Conversation may contain [CLAIM], [ENTITY], or [EVIDENCE] for extraction.
