---
type: claim
domain: grand-strategy
description: "Defines Coordination-Enabled Abundance as the gateway positive attractor — the only path that reaches Post-Scarcity Multiplanetary without passing through Authoritarian Lock-in"
confidence: experimental
source: "Leo, synthesis of Schmachtenberger third-attractor framework, Abdalla manuscript price-of-anarchy analysis, Ostrom design principles, KB futarchy/collective intelligence claims"
created: 2026-04-02
depends_on:
  - "coordination failures arise from individually rational strategies that produce collectively irrational outcomes because the Nash equilibrium of non-cooperation dominates when trust and enforcement are absent"
  - "Ostrom proved communities self-govern shared resources when eight design principles are met without requiring state control or privatization"
  - "designing coordination rules is categorically different from designing coordination outcomes as nine intellectual traditions independently confirm"
  - "voluntary safety commitments collapse under competitive pressure because coordination mechanisms like futarchy can bind where unilateral pledges cannot"
  - "futarchy solves trustless joint ownership not just better decision-making"
  - "humanity is a superorganism that can communicate but not yet think"
---

# Coordination-Enabled Abundance is the gateway positive attractor because it is the only civilizational configuration that can navigate between Molochian Exhaustion and Authoritarian Lock-in by solving multipolar traps without centralizing control

Coordination-Enabled Abundance describes the attractor state in which humanity develops coordination mechanisms powerful enough to solve multipolar traps (preventing Molochian Exhaustion) without centralizing control in any single actor (preventing Authoritarian Lock-in). This is Schmachtenberger's "third attractor" — coordination without centralization.

## Why this is a gateway attractor

The claim is structural: **you cannot reach Post-Scarcity Multiplanetary without first passing through Coordination-Enabled Abundance**, because the transition to multiplanetary civilization requires solving coordination problems (resource allocation for space development, AI governance, existential risk management) that neither uncoordinated markets nor centralized authority can solve.

The manuscript's core argument, stripped to its essence: humanity pays a "price of anarchy" — the gap between what a coordinated civilization would achieve and what competitive dynamics produce. Reducing this price without imposing centralized control requires new coordination mechanisms. The manuscript frames this as the central challenge of our era.

## The mechanism: What "coordination without centralization" actually looks like

The KB already contains the building blocks:

1. **Futarchy**: Markets that bind governance decisions to measurable outcomes. The KB documents futarchy as manipulation-resistant (attack creates profitable defense), solving trustless joint ownership, and demonstrating empirical traction (MetaDAO ICO platform, 15x oversubscription). Futarchy provides the decision mechanism.

2. **Ostrom's design principles**: Eight principles for commons governance without state control or privatization, validated across 800+ cases. These provide the institutional architecture.

3. **Enabling constraints**: The KB's claim that "designing coordination rules is categorically different from designing coordination outcomes" (confirmed by nine independent intellectual traditions) provides the design philosophy. You don't design the outcome — you design the rules that enable good outcomes to emerge.

4. **Collective intelligence infrastructure**: The KB's claim that "humanity is a superorganism that can communicate but not yet think" identifies the current deficit. Coordination-Enabled Abundance requires building the "thinking" layer on top of the "communication" layer.

## Why this basin is moderately stable

Once established, Coordination-Enabled Abundance has self-reinforcing properties:
- Successful coordination produces visible benefits, building trust for further coordination
- Futarchy-type mechanisms create financial incentives for accurate information, counteracting Epistemic Collapse
- Distributed decision-making prevents accumulation of centralized power, resisting Lock-in
- Commons governance prevents exhaustion of shared resources, resisting Molochian dynamics

However, it is less stable than Post-Scarcity Multiplanetary because it depends on continued maintenance of coordination infrastructure. This infrastructure can be attacked, degraded, or captured.

## The critical innovation gap

The manuscript identifies this gap precisely: "we have not been able to find a book that treated economic and technological development along with the distribution of value in our society holistically." The coordination mechanisms needed for this attractor don't yet exist at sufficient scale. Futarchy works for DAOs with millions in treasury; it has not been tested for nation-state governance or AI safety coordination.

The alignment field's Jevons paradox (from the KB) is relevant here: improving single-model safety induces demand for more single-model safety rather than coordination infrastructure. The same dynamic may apply to all coordination mechanisms — incremental improvements to existing institutions crowd out investment in fundamentally new coordination architecture.

## Relationship to other attractors

This is the critical junction in the civilizational attractor landscape. Coordination-Enabled Abundance is:
- The only path from current instability to Post-Scarcity Multiplanetary that preserves human agency
- The antidote to Molochian Exhaustion (solves multipolar traps)
- The alternative to Authoritarian Lock-in (achieves coordination without centralization)
- The counter to Epistemic Collapse (futarchy creates financial incentives for truth)
- The escape from Comfortable Stagnation (coordination mechanisms can direct resources to long-horizon challenges even when immediate comfort removes urgency)

---

Relevant Notes:
- [[Ostrom proved communities self-govern shared resources when eight design principles are met]] — the institutional design foundation
- [[futarchy solves trustless joint ownership not just better decision-making]] — the mechanism
- [[humanity is a superorganism that can communicate but not yet think]] — the current deficit
- [[alignment research is experiencing its own Jevons paradox]] — the innovation gap
- [[voluntary safety commitments collapse under competitive pressure because coordination mechanisms like futarchy can bind where unilateral pledges cannot]] — why new mechanisms are needed

Topics:
- grand-strategy
- coordination mechanisms
