---
type: source
source_type: x-tweet
title: "@jabranthelawyer — shared via Telegram by @m3taversal"
author: "@jabranthelawyer"
url: "https://x.com/jabranthelawyer/status/2038413063381246199?s=20"
date: 2026-03-30
domain: internet-finance
format: social-media
status: processed
proposed_by: "@m3taversal"
contribution_type: source-submission
tags: ['telegram-shared', 'x-tweet', 'governance']
claims_extracted:
- "permissioned-launch-curation-creates-implicit-endorsement-liability-for-futarchy-platforms"
---

# @jabranthelawyer — Tweet/Thread

Shared by @m3taversal via Telegram.
Source URL: https://x.com/jabranthelawyer/status/2038413063381246199?s=20

## Content

Few thoughts if I was MetaDAO's lawyer:

1. P2P did something objectively wrong. Whether illegal TBC but possible

2. Regulators look at conduct and by exercising control, it creates bad precedent in two ways here:

A) They've moved from simply a "fundraising platform" to one actively involved in raise 

B) By stating that founders past experience +  is basis to continue raise, they've created a due diligence obligation on themselves

- Best to check the indemnities founders provide to ensure they're covered because all of this has just increased MetaDAO's risk profile unnecessarily imo
