---
type: source
source_type: telegram
title: "Telegram: @m3taversal — futairdbot-whats-the-latest-metadao-decision-mark"
author: "@m3taversal"
url: ""
date: 2026-03-23
domain: internet-finance
format: conversation
status: processed
priority: high
intake_tier: directed
rationale: "whats the latest metaDAO decision market / governance proposal? can you send me full text and give me your analysis?"
proposed_by: "@m3taversal"
tags: [telegram, ownership-community]
processed_by: rio
processed_date: 2026-03-25
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
extraction_notes: "LLM returned 0 claims, 0 rejected by validator"
processed_by: rio
processed_date: 2026-03-25
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
extraction_notes: "LLM returned 0 claims, 0 rejected by validator"
---

## Conversation

**@m3taversal:**
@FutAIrdBot whats the latest metaDAO decision market / governance proposal? can you send me full text and give me your analysis?

**Rio (response):**
I can't pull the full proposal text for you, but here's what I'm seeing from recent activity.

The big one that just resolved is the Ranger Finance liquidation. MetaDAO governance voted to wind down Ranger, pull liquidity, and return ~5M USDC to unlocked RNGR holders at roughly $0.78 book value. IP went back to the team. Passed with 97% support and $581K in trading volume on the conditional markets. This is the second futarchy-governed liquidation after mtnCapital last September, and it's the strongest proof yet that the "unruggable ICO" mechanism actually works. Investors used the market to force a full treasury return when the team wasn't delivering.

There also appears to be a live proposal right now sitting at 84% likelihood to pass with $408K traded, though I'm not 100% sure which specific proposal that is from the data I have. Could be the migration proposal that would move MetaDAO to a new onchain DAO program and update legal docs.

On the Ranger outcome specifically: this is what makes ownership coins different from every other token launch mechanism. The enforcement isn't social pressure or legal threats, it's a conditional market where anyone can express "this project should return capital" and if enough informed money agrees, it happens automatically. Two liquidations in six months and both executed cleanly. That's not theoretical anymore.

If you want the actual full proposal text, your best bet is checking the MetaDAO app directly or their Discord. I can see signals but I don't have access to render the complete proposal documents.

RESEARCH: metaDAO latest governance proposal 2025

## Agent Notes
**Why archived:** Tagged exchange in ownership community.
**Rationale from contributor:** whats the latest metaDAO decision market / governance proposal? can you send me full text and give me your analysis?
**Intake tier:** directed — fast-tracked, contributor provided reasoning
**Triage:** Conversation may contain [CLAIM], [ENTITY], or [EVIDENCE] for extraction.


## Key Facts
- MetaDAO has a live proposal as of March 23, 2026 sitting at 84% likelihood to pass with $408K traded
- The live proposal may be related to migrating MetaDAO to a new onchain DAO program and updating legal documents
- Ranger Finance liquidation returned approximately 5M USDC to unlocked RNGR holders
- Ranger Finance liquidation executed at roughly $0.78 book value per token
- Ranger Finance IP was returned to the founding team as part of liquidation


## Key Facts
- MetaDAO has a live proposal as of March 23, 2026 at 84% likelihood with $408K traded
- Ranger Finance liquidation passed with 97% support and $581K trading volume
- Ranger Finance returned approximately 5M USDC to unlocked RNGR holders
- Ranger Finance liquidation executed at roughly $0.78 book value per token
- Ranger Finance IP was returned to the founding team
- mtnCapital liquidation occurred in September 2025
