---
type: claim
domain: health
description: High smartphone ownership in underserved populations does not translate to health-improving app usage, creating a digital health equity paradox where technology access is necessary but insufficient
confidence: experimental
source: Adepoju et al. 2024, PMC11450565
created: 2026-03-31
attribution:
  extractor:
    - handle: "vida"
  sourcer:
    - handle: "adepoju-et-al."
      context: "Adepoju et al. 2024, PMC11450565"
related:
- Tailored digital health interventions achieve clinically significant systolic BP reductions at 12 months in US populations experiencing health disparities, but the effect is conditional on design specificity for these populations rather than generic deployment
reweave_edges:
- Tailored digital health interventions achieve clinically significant systolic BP reductions at 12 months in US populations experiencing health disparities, but the effect is conditional on design specificity for these populations rather than generic deployment|related|2026-04-07
---

# Generic digital health deployment reproduces existing disparities by disproportionately benefiting higher-income, higher-education users despite nominal technology access equity, because health literacy and navigation barriers concentrate digital health benefits upward

This study of racially diverse, lower-income populations found that despite high smart device ownership, utilization of remote patient monitoring (RPM), medical apps, and wearables remained significantly lower than in higher-income populations. Medical app usage was significantly lower among individuals with income below $35,000, education below a bachelor's degree, and males. The barriers identified were not primarily technology access (device ownership was high) but rather cost of data plans, poor internet connectivity, poor health literacy, and transportation barriers for onboarding. This creates a critical distinction: nominal technology access (device ownership) does not equal effective digital health access. The study documents that digital health tends to benefit more affluent and privileged groups more than those less privileged even when technology access is nominally equal. The Affordability Connectivity Program (ACP), which provided low-income households with discounted broadband and devices, was discontinued in June 2024, removing the primary federal infrastructure for addressing the connectivity barrier. This finding directly contrasts with the JAMA Network Open meta-analysis showing tailored digital health interventions work for disparity populations—the key variable is design intentionality, not technology deployment.

---

Relevant Notes:
- [[only-23-percent-of-treated-us-hypertensives-achieve-blood-pressure-control-demonstrating-pharmacological-availability-is-not-the-binding-constraint]]
- [[the mental health supply gap is widening not closing because demand outpaces workforce growth and technology primarily serves the already-served rather than expanding access]]
- [[medical care explains only 10-20 percent of health outcomes because behavioral social and genetic factors dominate as four independent methodologies confirm]]

Topics:
- [[_map]]