reweave: merge 16 files via frontmatter union [auto]
Some checks are pending
Mirror PR to Forgejo / mirror (pull_request) Waiting to run
Some checks are pending
Mirror PR to Forgejo / mirror (pull_request) Waiting to run
This commit is contained in:
Teleo Agents
parent
8ee739aa69
commit
03b0dc5da8
16 changed files with 72 additions and 14 deletions
|
|
@ -9,6 +9,9 @@ challenges:
|
|||
- permissioned-futarchy-icos-are-securities-at-launch-regardless-of-governance-mechanism-because-team-effort-dominates-early-value-creation
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- permissioned-futarchy-icos-are-securities-at-launch-regardless-of-governance-mechanism-because-team-effort-dominates-early-value-creation|challenges|2026-04-19
|
||||
- confidential computing reshapes defi mechanism design|related|2026-04-28
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- confidential computing reshapes defi mechanism design
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# futarchy-governed entities are structurally not securities because prediction market participation replaces the concentrated promoter effort that the Howey test requires
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -8,8 +8,10 @@ source: "Massenkoff & McCrory 2026, Current Population Survey analysis post-Chat
|
|||
created: 2026-03-08
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- Does AI substitute for human labor or complement it — and at what phase does the pattern shift?
|
||||
- AI displacement of cognitive workers creates a second wave of deaths of despair that extends the manufacturing displacement mechanism to professional classes
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- Does AI substitute for human labor or complement it — and at what phase does the pattern shift?|related|2026-04-17
|
||||
- AI displacement of cognitive workers creates a second wave of deaths of despair that extends the manufacturing displacement mechanism to professional classes|related|2026-04-28
|
||||
sourced_from:
|
||||
- inbox/archive/ai-alignment/2026-03-05-anthropic-labor-market-impacts.md
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -9,10 +9,12 @@ created: 2026-03-16
|
|||
related:
|
||||
- whether AI knowledge codification concentrates or distributes depends on infrastructure openness because the same extraction mechanism produces digital feudalism under proprietary control and collective intelligence under commons governance
|
||||
- Geopolitical competition over algorithmic narrative control confirms narrative distribution infrastructure has civilizational strategic value because states compete for algorithm ownership when narrative remains the active ingredient
|
||||
- capability commoditization at the model layer does not break asymmetric concentration because economic leverage lives in infrastructure not in consumer services
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- whether AI knowledge codification concentrates or distributes depends on infrastructure openness because the same extraction mechanism produces digital feudalism under proprietary control and collective intelligence under commons governance|related|2026-04-07
|
||||
- Geopolitical competition over algorithmic narrative control confirms narrative distribution infrastructure has civilizational strategic value because states compete for algorithm ownership when narrative remains the active ingredient|related|2026-04-26
|
||||
- AI capability funding exceeds collective intelligence funding by roughly four orders of magnitude creating the largest asymmetric opportunity of the AI era|supports|2026-04-27
|
||||
- capability commoditization at the model layer does not break asymmetric concentration because economic leverage lives in infrastructure not in consumer services|related|2026-04-28
|
||||
sourced_from:
|
||||
- inbox/archive/ai-alignment/2026-03-16-theseus-ai-industry-landscape-briefing.md
|
||||
supports:
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -9,8 +9,10 @@ created: 2026-03-08
|
|||
related:
|
||||
- profit-wage divergence has been structural since the 1970s which means AI accelerates an existing distribution failure rather than creating a new one
|
||||
- divergence-ai-labor-displacement-substitution-vs-complementarity
|
||||
- AI displacement of cognitive workers creates a second wave of deaths of despair that extends the manufacturing displacement mechanism to professional classes
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- profit-wage divergence has been structural since the 1970s which means AI accelerates an existing distribution failure rather than creating a new one|related|2026-04-19
|
||||
- AI displacement of cognitive workers creates a second wave of deaths of despair that extends the manufacturing displacement mechanism to professional classes|related|2026-04-28
|
||||
sourced_from:
|
||||
- inbox/archive/ai-alignment/2026-03-05-anthropic-labor-market-impacts.md
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -15,6 +15,9 @@ supports:
|
|||
- open source local first personal AI agents create a viable alternative to platform controlled AI but only if they solve user owned persistent memory infrastructure
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- open source local first personal AI agents create a viable alternative to platform controlled AI but only if they solve user owned persistent memory infrastructure|supports|2026-04-26
|
||||
- capability commoditization at the model layer does not break asymmetric concentration because economic leverage lives in infrastructure not in consumer services|related|2026-04-28
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- capability commoditization at the model layer does not break asymmetric concentration because economic leverage lives in infrastructure not in consumer services
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Whether AI knowledge codification concentrates or distributes depends on infrastructure openness because the same extraction mechanism produces digital feudalism under proprietary control and collective intelligence under commons governance
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -10,11 +10,13 @@ related:
|
|||
- AI narrative filmmaking breakthrough will be a filmmaker using AI tools not pure AI automation
|
||||
- AI production cost decline of 60% annually makes feature-film quality accessible at consumer price points by 2029
|
||||
- ip-rights-management-becomes-dominant-cost-in-content-production-as-technical-costs-approach-zero
|
||||
- Paramount Skydance (PSKY)
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- non-ATL production costs will converge with the cost of compute as AI replaces labor across the production chain|related|2026-04-04
|
||||
- AI narrative filmmaking breakthrough will be a filmmaker using AI tools not pure AI automation|related|2026-04-17
|
||||
- AI production cost decline of 60% annually makes feature-film quality accessible at consumer price points by 2029|related|2026-04-17
|
||||
- ip-rights-management-becomes-dominant-cost-in-content-production-as-technical-costs-approach-zero|related|2026-04-17
|
||||
- Paramount Skydance (PSKY)|related|2026-04-28
|
||||
sourced_from:
|
||||
- inbox/archive/general/shapiro-hollywood-talent-embrace-ai.md
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -10,8 +10,16 @@ agent: clay
|
|||
sourced_from: entertainment/2026-04-24-variety-squishmallows-blank-canvas-licensing-strategy.md
|
||||
scope: causal
|
||||
sourcer: Variety/Jazwares
|
||||
challenges: ["community-owned-ip-invests-in-narrative-infrastructure-as-scaling-mechanism-after-proving-token-mechanics"]
|
||||
related: ["blank-narrative-vessel-achieves-commercial-scale-through-fan-emotional-projection", "minimum-viable-narrative-achieves-50m-revenue-scale-through-character-design-and-distribution-without-story-depth", "distributed-narrative-architecture-enables-ip-scale-without-concentrated-story-through-blank-canvas-fan-projection"]
|
||||
challenges:
|
||||
- community-owned-ip-invests-in-narrative-infrastructure-as-scaling-mechanism-after-proving-token-mechanics
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- blank-narrative-vessel-achieves-commercial-scale-through-fan-emotional-projection
|
||||
- minimum-viable-narrative-achieves-50m-revenue-scale-through-character-design-and-distribution-without-story-depth
|
||||
- distributed-narrative-architecture-enables-ip-scale-without-concentrated-story-through-blank-canvas-fan-projection
|
||||
supports:
|
||||
- Narrative development attempts fail when commercial scale precedes narrative investment because business model lock-in removes incentive to take creative risk
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- Narrative development attempts fail when commercial scale precedes narrative investment because business model lock-in removes incentive to take creative risk|supports|2026-04-28
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Blank canvas IPs achieve billion-dollar scale through licensing to established franchises rather than building original narrative
|
||||
|
|
@ -23,4 +31,4 @@ Squishmallows signed with CAA in 2021 explicitly for 'film, TV, gaming, publishi
|
|||
|
||||
**Source:** Animation Magazine / DreamWorks announcement, 2025-2026
|
||||
|
||||
Pudgy Penguins pursued dual narrative strategy: original content (Lil Pudgys series with TheSoul) AND licensing to established franchise (DreamWorks Kung Fu Panda collaboration, October 2025). This suggests blank canvas IP can simultaneously build original narrative while borrowing established narrative equity.
|
||||
Pudgy Penguins pursued dual narrative strategy: original content (Lil Pudgys series with TheSoul) AND licensing to established franchise (DreamWorks Kung Fu Panda collaboration, October 2025). This suggests blank canvas IP can simultaneously build original narrative while borrowing established narrative equity.
|
||||
|
|
@ -7,12 +7,16 @@ confidence: likely
|
|||
source: "Clay — multi-source synthesis of Paramount/Skydance acquisition and WBD merger (2024-2026)"
|
||||
created: 2026-04-01
|
||||
depends_on:
|
||||
- "media disruption follows two sequential phases as distribution moats fall first and creation moats fall second"
|
||||
- "streaming churn may be permanently uneconomic because maintenance marketing consumes up to half of average revenue per user"
|
||||
- media disruption follows two sequential phases as distribution moats fall first and creation moats fall second
|
||||
- streaming churn may be permanently uneconomic because maintenance marketing consumes up to half of average revenue per user
|
||||
challenged_by:
|
||||
- "challenge-three-body-oligopoly-understates-original-ip-viability-in-prestige-adaptation-category"
|
||||
- challenge-three-body-oligopoly-understates-original-ip-viability-in-prestige-adaptation-category
|
||||
sourced_from:
|
||||
- inbox/archive/2026-04-01-clay-paramount-skydance-wbd-merger-research.md
|
||||
supports:
|
||||
- Paramount Skydance (PSKY)
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- Paramount Skydance (PSKY)|supports|2026-04-28
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Legacy media is consolidating into three surviving entities because the Warner-Paramount merger eliminates the fourth independent major and forecloses alternative industry structures
|
||||
|
|
@ -65,4 +69,4 @@ Relevant Notes:
|
|||
|
||||
Topics:
|
||||
- [[web3 entertainment and creator economy]]
|
||||
- entertainment
|
||||
- entertainment
|
||||
|
|
@ -7,8 +7,12 @@ confidence: experimental
|
|||
source: "Clay — synthesis of Henrich's collective brain theory (2015) with creator/corporate zero-sum dynamics and consolidation data"
|
||||
created: 2026-04-03
|
||||
depends_on:
|
||||
- "creator and corporate media economies are zero-sum because total media time is stagnant and every marginal hour shifts between them"
|
||||
- "legacy media is consolidating into three surviving entities because the Warner-Paramount merger eliminates the fourth independent major and forecloses alternative industry structures"
|
||||
- creator and corporate media economies are zero-sum because total media time is stagnant and every marginal hour shifts between them
|
||||
- legacy media is consolidating into three surviving entities because the Warner-Paramount merger eliminates the fourth independent major and forecloses alternative industry structures
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- Individual creator model bifurcates into winner-take-most economics at the top and below-living-wage at the median, while community IP brand models avoid individual burnout by distributing creative work across communities
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- Individual creator model bifurcates into winner-take-most economics at the top and below-living-wage at the median, while community IP brand models avoid individual burnout by distributing creative work across communities|related|2026-04-28
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Studio consolidation shrinks the cultural collective brain while creator economy expansion grows it, predicting accelerating innovation asymmetry
|
||||
|
|
@ -46,4 +50,4 @@ Relevant Notes:
|
|||
|
||||
Topics:
|
||||
- domains/entertainment/_map
|
||||
- foundations/cultural-dynamics/_map
|
||||
- foundations/cultural-dynamics/_map
|
||||
|
|
@ -14,6 +14,9 @@ supports:
|
|||
- GLP-1 long-term persistence remains structurally limited at 14 percent by year two despite year-one improvements
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- GLP-1 long-term persistence remains structurally limited at 14 percent by year two despite year-one improvements|supports|2026-04-09
|
||||
- Endocrinologists and obesity specialists achieve higher GLP-1 12-week completion rates than primary care providers supporting specialized obesity medicine infrastructure investment|related|2026-04-28
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- Endocrinologists and obesity specialists achieve higher GLP-1 12-week completion rates than primary care providers supporting specialized obesity medicine infrastructure investment
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# GLP-1 year-one persistence for obesity nearly doubled from 2021 to 2024 driven by supply normalization and improved patient management
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -21,10 +21,12 @@ related:
|
|||
- prediction-markets-face-political-sustainability-risk-from-gambling-perception-despite-legal-defensibility
|
||||
- bipartisan-prediction-market-legislation-threatens-cftc-preemption-through-congressional-redefinition
|
||||
- dcm-field-preemption-protects-all-contracts-on-registered-platforms-regardless-of-type
|
||||
- Tribal gaming IGRA exclusivity creates federal prediction market enforcement pathway independent of Dodd-Frank preemption
|
||||
supports:
|
||||
- Bipartisan state AG coalition of 38 jurisdictions signals near-consensus government opposition to CFTC prediction market preemption through federalism arguments that transcend partisan alignment
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- Bipartisan state AG coalition of 38 jurisdictions signals near-consensus government opposition to CFTC prediction market preemption through federalism arguments that transcend partisan alignment|supports|2026-04-27
|
||||
- Tribal gaming IGRA exclusivity creates federal prediction market enforcement pathway independent of Dodd-Frank preemption|related|2026-04-28
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Bipartisan Senate legislation to reclassify prediction market sports contracts as gambling threatens CFTC preemption through Congressional redefinition rather than judicial interpretation
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -10,10 +10,24 @@ agent: rio
|
|||
sourced_from: internet-finance/2026-04-24-38ag-massachusetts-sjc-bipartisan-amicus-cftc-preemption.md
|
||||
scope: structural
|
||||
sourcer: Multi-State Attorney General Coalition
|
||||
challenges: ["cftc-licensed-dcm-preemption-protects-centralized-prediction-markets-but-not-decentralized-governance-markets", "third-circuit-ruling-creates-first-federal-appellate-precedent-for-cftc-preemption-of-state-gambling-laws"]
|
||||
related: ["cftc-licensed-dcm-preemption-protects-centralized-prediction-markets-but-not-decentralized-governance-markets", "rule-40-11-paradox-creates-theory-level-circuit-split-on-cftc-preemption", "third-circuit-ruling-creates-first-federal-appellate-precedent-for-cftc-preemption-of-state-gambling-laws", "bipartisan-state-ag-coalition-signals-near-consensus-opposition-to-cftc-prediction-market-preemption", "dcm-field-preemption-protects-all-contracts-on-registered-platforms-regardless-of-type", "cftc-state-supreme-court-amicus-signals-multi-jurisdictional-defense-strategy", "cftc-gaming-classification-silence-signals-rule-40-11-structural-contradiction", "prediction-markets-face-political-sustainability-risk-from-gambling-perception-despite-legal-defensibility"]
|
||||
challenges:
|
||||
- cftc-licensed-dcm-preemption-protects-centralized-prediction-markets-but-not-decentralized-governance-markets
|
||||
- third-circuit-ruling-creates-first-federal-appellate-precedent-for-cftc-preemption-of-state-gambling-laws
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- cftc-licensed-dcm-preemption-protects-centralized-prediction-markets-but-not-decentralized-governance-markets
|
||||
- rule-40-11-paradox-creates-theory-level-circuit-split-on-cftc-preemption
|
||||
- third-circuit-ruling-creates-first-federal-appellate-precedent-for-cftc-preemption-of-state-gambling-laws
|
||||
- bipartisan-state-ag-coalition-signals-near-consensus-opposition-to-cftc-prediction-market-preemption
|
||||
- dcm-field-preemption-protects-all-contracts-on-registered-platforms-regardless-of-type
|
||||
- cftc-state-supreme-court-amicus-signals-multi-jurisdictional-defense-strategy
|
||||
- cftc-gaming-classification-silence-signals-rule-40-11-structural-contradiction
|
||||
- prediction-markets-face-political-sustainability-risk-from-gambling-perception-despite-legal-defensibility
|
||||
supports:
|
||||
- 38-state bipartisan AG coalition opposing CFTC prediction market preemption signals that the state-federal conflict is a states' rights issue, not a partisan issue — making SCOTUS resolution less predictable even for a court that historically favors federal preemption
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- 38-state bipartisan AG coalition opposing CFTC prediction market preemption signals that the state-federal conflict is a states' rights issue, not a partisan issue — making SCOTUS resolution less predictable even for a court that historically favors federal preemption|supports|2026-04-28
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# The Dodd-Frank textual argument (exclusive jurisdiction clause predates gambling-adjacent prediction markets) is the strongest legal theory for state resistance because it attacks the textual basis, not the policy wisdom, of CFTC preemption
|
||||
|
||||
The 38 state AGs' core legal argument is that CFTC cannot claim exclusive preemption authority based on Dodd-Frank because the statute's exclusive jurisdiction clause 'does not even mention gambling at all.' They argue Dodd-Frank targeted 2008 financial crisis instruments (derivatives, swaps, systemic risk) — not sports gambling or prediction markets. This textual argument is stronger than policy-based challenges because it attacks the statutory foundation of CFTC's preemption claim rather than arguing CFTC is wrong on policy. Courts defer to agencies on policy questions (Chevron deference, though weakened) but not on questions of statutory authority. If the exclusive jurisdiction clause doesn't textually cover gambling-adjacent contracts, then CFTC's field preemption claim fails regardless of who controls the White House or CFTC. This is a structural legal argument, not a political one. The fact that 38 AGs across the political spectrum are making this argument signals they believe it has legal merit independent of partisan preferences. If this theory prevails, DCM-registered platforms lose their federal preemption shield permanently, not just during unfavorable administrations.
|
||||
The 38 state AGs' core legal argument is that CFTC cannot claim exclusive preemption authority based on Dodd-Frank because the statute's exclusive jurisdiction clause 'does not even mention gambling at all.' They argue Dodd-Frank targeted 2008 financial crisis instruments (derivatives, swaps, systemic risk) — not sports gambling or prediction markets. This textual argument is stronger than policy-based challenges because it attacks the statutory foundation of CFTC's preemption claim rather than arguing CFTC is wrong on policy. Courts defer to agencies on policy questions (Chevron deference, though weakened) but not on questions of statutory authority. If the exclusive jurisdiction clause doesn't textually cover gambling-adjacent contracts, then CFTC's field preemption claim fails regardless of who controls the White House or CFTC. This is a structural legal argument, not a political one. The fact that 38 AGs across the political spectrum are making this argument signals they believe it has legal merit independent of partisan preferences. If this theory prevails, DCM-registered platforms lose their federal preemption shield permanently, not just during unfavorable administrations.
|
||||
|
|
@ -15,11 +15,13 @@ related:
|
|||
- solana-defi-will-overtake-hyperliquid-within-two-years-through-composability-advantage-compounding
|
||||
- "Solomon: Futardio ICO Launch"
|
||||
- "Solomon: DP-00002 — SOLO Acquisition and Restricted Incentives Reserve"
|
||||
- confidential computing reshapes defi mechanism design
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- solana-defi-will-overtake-hyperliquid-within-two-years-through-composability-advantage-compounding|related|2026-04-19
|
||||
- "Solomon: Futardio ICO Launch|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
- "Solomon: DP-00002 — SOLO Acquisition and Restricted Incentives Reserve|related|2026-04-19"
|
||||
- "Solomon: DP-00001 — Treasury Subcommittee and Legal Budget|supports|2026-04-19"
|
||||
- confidential computing reshapes defi mechanism design|related|2026-04-28
|
||||
sourced_from:
|
||||
- inbox/archive/internet-finance/2026-03-05-metadaoproject-treasury-subcommittee.md
|
||||
- inbox/archive/internet-finance/2026-03-05-solomon-dp-00001-treasury-subcommittee-full.md
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -9,9 +9,11 @@ challenges:
|
|||
- permissioned-futarchy-icos-are-securities-at-launch-regardless-of-governance-mechanism-because-team-effort-dominates-early-value-creation
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- the SECs treatment of staking rewards as service payments establishes that mechanical participation in network consensus is not an investment contract
|
||||
- confidential computing reshapes defi mechanism design
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- permissioned-futarchy-icos-are-securities-at-launch-regardless-of-governance-mechanism-because-team-effort-dominates-early-value-creation|challenges|2026-04-19
|
||||
- the SECs treatment of staking rewards as service payments establishes that mechanical participation in network consensus is not an investment contract|related|2026-04-19
|
||||
- confidential computing reshapes defi mechanism design|related|2026-04-28
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# futarchy-governed entities are structurally not securities because prediction market participation replaces the concentrated promoter effort that the Howey test requires
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -7,8 +7,10 @@ source: "Citadel Securities (Frank Flight) via Fortune, Feb 2026; Engels' Pause
|
|||
created: 2026-03-08
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- technological diffusion follows S-curves not exponentials because physical constraints on compute expansion create diminishing marginal returns that plateau adoption before full labor substitution
|
||||
- AI displacement of cognitive workers creates a second wave of deaths of despair that extends the manufacturing displacement mechanism to professional classes
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- technological diffusion follows S-curves not exponentials because physical constraints on compute expansion create diminishing marginal returns that plateau adoption before full labor substitution|related|2026-04-19
|
||||
- AI displacement of cognitive workers creates a second wave of deaths of despair that extends the manufacturing displacement mechanism to professional classes|related|2026-04-28
|
||||
sourced_from:
|
||||
- inbox/archive/internet-finance/2026-02-26-citadel-securities-contra-citrini-rebuttal.md
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -13,6 +13,9 @@ related:
|
|||
- the alignment tax creates a structural race to the bottom because safety training costs capability and rational competitors skip it
|
||||
- collective intelligence is a measurable property of group interaction structure not aggregated individual ability
|
||||
- adversarial contribution produces higher-quality collective knowledge than collaborative contribution when wrong challenges have real cost evaluation is structurally separated from contribution and confirmation is rewarded alongside novelty
|
||||
- capability commoditization at the model layer does not break asymmetric concentration because economic leverage lives in infrastructure not in consumer services
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- capability commoditization at the model layer does not break asymmetric concentration because economic leverage lives in infrastructure not in consumer services|related|2026-04-28
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# AI capability funding exceeds collective intelligence funding by roughly four orders of magnitude creating the largest asymmetric opportunity of the AI era
|
||||
|
|
@ -81,4 +84,4 @@ Relevant Notes:
|
|||
Topics:
|
||||
- [[maps/livingip overview]]
|
||||
- [[maps/coordination mechanisms]]
|
||||
- [[domains/internet-finance/_map]]
|
||||
- [[domains/internet-finance/_map]]
|
||||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue