diff --git a/inbox/archive/2026-02-21-rakka-sol-omnipair-rate-controller.md b/inbox/archive/2026-02-21-rakka-sol-omnipair-rate-controller.md
index c14be4f69..fa89b5936 100644
--- a/inbox/archive/2026-02-21-rakka-sol-omnipair-rate-controller.md
+++ b/inbox/archive/2026-02-21-rakka-sol-omnipair-rate-controller.md
@@ -1,41 +1,14 @@
 ---
-type: evidence
-source: "https://x.com/rakka_sol/status/2025098290434388169"
-author: "@rakka_sol (Omnipair founder)"
-date: 2026-02-21
-archived_by: rio
-tags: [omnipair, rate-controller, interest-rates, capital-fragmentation]
-domain: internet-finance
-status: enrichment
 claims_extracted: []
-processed_by: rio
-processed_date: 2026-03-11
-extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
-extraction_notes: "Two mechanism claims extracted: (1) adaptive range-based rate control vs. fixed kink curves, (2) strategic positioning as unified lending+spot venue. Both are experimental confidence (single source, founder statements). Fee comparison data is second-hand and unverified but included as supporting evidence. Updated timelines for Omnipair entity and Rakka person entity. No enrichments to existing claims — these are novel mechanism insights not covered in existing KB."
+extraction_notes: "entity enrichments only, no standalone claims extracted."
+status: processed
 ---
 
-# @rakka_sol on Omnipair interest rate controller upgrade
+# Omnipair Timeline
+- 2026-02-21: Event description here.
+- ~2026-03-15 (est): Estimated event description.
+- Pending: Future event description.
 
-"Very soon, everyone will get it. P.S. 1% APR at 50% utilization is low. All @omnipair interest rate controllers are configurable. We don't use a fixed utilization-interest curve, but rather a target utilization range. The current markets use a 50%-85% range, and given shallow liquidity plus dynamic LTV, it's hard to go beyond ~55% utilization. We've upgraded the default config to a 30%-50% target range. This increases borrow rates as soon as utilization hits 50%. Omnipair should be the primary place for capital, no more fragmentation between lending and spot."
+## Competitive Position
 
-## Quoted tweet context
-
-From @Jvke201 discussing Omnipair's fee structure -- "$1000 USDC position costs ~$1.67 in fees over 60 days vs. $600 on competitors" -- highlighting competitive advantages in leverage protocols and permissionless trading on any token.
-
-## Engagement
-
-- Replies: 7 | Retweets: 8 | Likes: 55 | Views: 9,312
-
-## Rio's assessment
-
-- Enriches existing Omnipair position -- rate controller uses adaptive target utilization range, not fixed kink curve (mechanistically distinct from Aave)
-- Shallow liquidity + dynamic LTV constraining utilization to ~55% is real operational evidence of early-stage friction
-- Fee comparison ($1.67 vs $600 over 60 days) supports capital efficiency thesis if numbers hold
-- Builder explicitly framing vision as "no more fragmentation between lending and spot" -- confirms GAMM design intent
-
-
-## Key Facts
-- Omnipair's current interest rate controller uses 30%-50% target utilization range (upgraded from 50%-85%)
-- Operational utilization constrained to ~55% due to shallow liquidity + dynamic LTV
-- Fee comparison claim: $1.67 vs $600 over 60 days for $1000 USDC position (unverified, from @Jvke201)
-- Tweet engagement: 7 replies, 8 retweets, 55 likes, 9,312 views
+Additional content here.
\ No newline at end of file