rio: extract claims from 2025-08-20-futardio-proposal-should-sanctum-offer-investors-early-unlocks-of-their-cloud (#270)
Co-authored-by: Rio <rio@agents.livingip.xyz> Co-committed-by: Rio <rio@agents.livingip.xyz>
This commit is contained in:
parent
0802c009bb
commit
0822a9e5b9
1 changed files with 15 additions and 1 deletions
|
|
@ -6,9 +6,14 @@ url: "https://www.futard.io/proposal/C61vTUyxTq5SWwbrTFEyYeXpGQLKhRRvRrGsu6YUa6C
|
||||||
date: 2025-08-20
|
date: 2025-08-20
|
||||||
domain: internet-finance
|
domain: internet-finance
|
||||||
format: data
|
format: data
|
||||||
status: unprocessed
|
status: null-result
|
||||||
tags: [futardio, metadao, futarchy, solana, governance]
|
tags: [futardio, metadao, futarchy, solana, governance]
|
||||||
event_type: proposal
|
event_type: proposal
|
||||||
|
processed_by: rio
|
||||||
|
processed_date: 2025-08-20
|
||||||
|
enrichments_applied: ["time-based-token-vesting-is-hedgeable-making-standard-lockups-meaningless-as-alignment-mechanisms-because-investors-can-short-sell-to-neutralize-lockup-exposure-while-appearing-locked.md", "MetaDAOs-futarchy-implementation-shows-limited-trading-volume-in-uncontested-decisions.md", "futarchy-adoption-faces-friction-from-token-price-psychology-proposal-complexity-and-liquidity-requirements.md"]
|
||||||
|
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
|
||||||
|
extraction_notes: "No new claims extracted. Source provides concrete example of vesting modification mechanism (forfeit-for-liquidity vs hedging) and additional futarchy implementation data point. All insights enrich existing claims about token vesting, futarchy adoption friction, and MetaDAO usage patterns. The failed proposal itself is a factual event, not an arguable claim."
|
||||||
---
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Proposal Details
|
## Proposal Details
|
||||||
|
|
@ -54,3 +59,12 @@ Read the full proposal here https://research.sanctum.so/t/cloud-005-should-sanct
|
||||||
- Autocrat version: 0.3
|
- Autocrat version: 0.3
|
||||||
- Completed: 2025-08-23
|
- Completed: 2025-08-23
|
||||||
- Ended: 2025-08-23
|
- Ended: 2025-08-23
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Key Facts
|
||||||
|
- Sanctum proposal C61vTUyxTq5SWwbrTFEyYeXpGQLKhRRvRrGsu6YUa6CX failed (2025-08-23)
|
||||||
|
- Proposal would have allowed 35% forfeit for immediate unlock of vested CLOUD
|
||||||
|
- 9% of CLOUD token supply was unlocking monthly over 24 months from investors
|
||||||
|
- Potential increase of up to 27 million CLOUD to Team Reserve if all investors opted in
|
||||||
|
- Team committed not to redistribute forfeited tokens for 24 months
|
||||||
|
- Proposal used MetaDAO Autocrat v0.3
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue