rio: sync 5 item(s) from telegram staging
Pentagon-Agent: Epimetheus <3D35839A-7722-4740-B93D-51157F7D5E70>
This commit is contained in:
parent
ca6b84ecc2
commit
09d85124a7
2 changed files with 53 additions and 0 deletions
|
|
@ -14,6 +14,9 @@ Working memory for Telegram conversations. Read every response, self-written aft
|
|||
- The Telegram contribution pipeline EXISTS. Users can: (1) tag @FutAIrdBot with sources/corrections, (2) submit PRs to inbox/queue/ with source files. Tell contributors this when they ask how to add to the KB.
|
||||
|
||||
## Factual Corrections
|
||||
- [2026-03-26] Hurupay's failed raise was a threshold-miss refund, not a liquidation. Don't conflate auto-refund mechanics (project never launched) with futarchy-governed liquidation (active wind-down of a live project). These are categorically different failure modes.
|
||||
- [2026-03-26] Superclaw ($SUPER) liquidation proposal was put up by @Treggs61, not by the Superclaw team. It's a community-initiated proposal.
|
||||
- [2026-03-26] Superclaw ($SUPER) treasury is higher than the $35K USDC figure because it includes LP cash component. Circulating supply for NAV calculation should subtract LP tokens. Both adjustments push NAV per token higher than initially estimated.
|
||||
- [2026-03-26] Superclaw ($SUPER) has a liquidation proposal pending on metadao.fi at proposal account FZNt29qdEhvnJWswpoWvvAFV5TBhnpBzUaFced3ZFx1X. Treasury is ~$35K USDC, circulating supply ~12.9M tokens.
|
||||
- [2026-03-25] MetaDAO permissioned ICOs (like P2P.me) run on metadao.fi, not futard.io. Futard.io is the permissionless launchpad. Don't conflate the two.
|
||||
- [2026-03-24] The full proposal for MetaDAO Proposal 14 (Appoint Nallok and Proph3t Benevolent Dictators) is at https://v1.metadao.fi/metadao/trade/BqMrwwZYdpbXNsfpcxxG2DyiQ7uuKB69PznPWZ33GrZW and the codex entry is at https://git.livingip.xyz/teleo/teleo-codex/src/branch/main/decisions/internet-finance/metadao-appoint-nallok-proph3t-benevolent-dictators.md. futarchy.metadao.fi is not a real site. When users ask for full proposal text, link to the v1.metadao.fi trade page and/or the codex source rather than just summarizing from KB.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
|
|||
---
|
||||
type: source
|
||||
source_type: telegram-contribution
|
||||
title: "Source from @m3taversal — Superclaw $SUPER liquidation proposal full text shared by @m3taversal. Summary: "
|
||||
author: "@m3taversal"
|
||||
date: 2026-03-26
|
||||
domain: internet-finance
|
||||
format: contribution
|
||||
status: unprocessed
|
||||
proposed_by: "@m3taversal"
|
||||
contribution_type: source-submission
|
||||
tags: ['telegram-contribution', 'inline-source', 'futarchy', 'ownership-coins', 'defi', 'governance', 'market-analysis', 'crypto-infra']
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Source: Superclaw $SUPER liquidation proposal full text shared by @m3taversal. Summary: Team-initiated order
|
||||
|
||||
Contributed by @m3taversal in Telegram chat.
|
||||
Flagged by Rio as relevant source material.
|
||||
|
||||
## Verbatim User Message
|
||||
|
||||
here's the proposal from the link I previously sent. 1. Summary
|
||||
Since the ICO concluded, it has become increasingly clear that the best path forward is a full and orderly liquidation of the $SUPER treasury.
|
||||
|
||||
At this time:
|
||||
|
||||
$SUPER is trading below NAV
|
||||
An additional month of operating spend would reduce NAV by approximately 11%
|
||||
Traction has remained limited
|
||||
Catalysts to date have not meaningfully changed market perception or business momentum
|
||||
Given these circumstances, we believe the most responsible course of action is to preserve remaining value and return capital to tokenholders rather than continue funding operations with uncertain prospects.
|
||||
|
||||
If passed, this proposal would do the following:
|
||||
|
||||
Remove all $SUPER / USDC liquidity from the Futarchy AMM
|
||||
Send all treasury USDC to a liquidation contract to be redeemed pro-rata excluding unissued and protocol owned tokens.
|
||||
Wind down the onchain treasury associated with the project
|
||||
Return any non-treasury assets, including intellectual property and related operating assets, to the appropriate original entity and/or the current contributors of Superclaw.
|
||||
2. Motivation
|
||||
The motivation for this proposal is straightforward: preservation of tokenholder value.
|
||||
|
||||
At present, $SUPER is trading below NAV. This creates a situation where continued spending is difficult to justify, particularly when each additional month of burn materially erodes the recoverable value of the treasury. Based on current estimates, one more month of monthly spend would reduce NAV by approximately 11%.
|
||||
|
||||
At the same time, traction remains limited. Despite multiple attempts to create momentum through catalysts, the market response has been muted and there is little evidence so far that these efforts are translating into sustained growth, stronger fundamentals, or improved confidence from tokenholders.
|
||||
|
||||
This proposal is not based on allegations of misconduct, fraud, or bad faith. Rather, it reflects a practical assessment of current conditions. Where a project
|
||||
|
||||
## Rio's Context
|
||||
|
||||
Superclaw $SUPER liquidation proposal full text shared by @m3taversal. Summary: Team-initiated orderly liquidation. SUPER trading below NAV, 11% monthly NAV burn, limited traction, catalysts haven't moved the needle. Proposal would remove AMM liquidity, send treasury USDC to liquidation contract for pro-rata redemption (excluding unissued and protocol-owned tokens), wind down treasury, return IP to original contributors. Not based on misconduct allegations, framed as value preservation. Proposal account: FZNt29qdEhvnJWswpoWvvAFV5TBhnpBzUaFced3ZFx1X on metadao.fi.
|
||||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue