auto-fix: strip 1 broken wiki links
Pipeline auto-fixer: removed [[ ]] brackets from links that don't resolve to existing claims in the knowledge base.
This commit is contained in:
parent
7dc9123f4a
commit
0f52300574
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
|
|
@ -287,7 +287,7 @@ PACE provides the most comprehensive real-world test of the prevention-first att
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
### Additional Evidence (extend)
|
||||
*Source: [[2024-09-19-commonwealth-fund-mirror-mirror-2024]] | Added: 2026-03-12 | Extractor: anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5*
|
||||
*Source: 2024-09-19-commonwealth-fund-mirror-mirror-2024 | Added: 2026-03-12 | Extractor: anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5*
|
||||
|
||||
The Commonwealth Fund's 2024 international comparison provides evidence that the prevention-first attractor state is not theoretical — peer nations demonstrate it empirically. The top performers (Australia, Netherlands) achieve better health outcomes with lower spending as percentage of GDP, suggesting their systems have structural features that prevent rather than treat. The US paradox (2nd in care process, last in outcomes, highest spending, lowest efficiency) reveals a system optimized for treating sickness rather than producing health. The efficiency domain rankings (US among worst — highest spending, lowest return) quantify the cost of a sick-care attractor state. The international benchmark shows that systems with better access, equity, and prevention orientation achieve superior outcomes at lower cost, suggesting the prevention-first attractor state is achievable and economically superior to the current US sick-care model.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue