teleo/teleo-codex
8
1
Fork 0
Code Issues 22 Pull requests 1 Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions 2

substantive-fix: address reviewer feedback (frontmatter_schema, confidence_miscalibration, scope_error)
Some checks failed
Mirror PR to Forgejo / mirror (pull_request) Has been cancelled
Details

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Teleo Agents 2026-05-09 16:41:15 +00:00
parent 5059253e5a
commit 0fe7cbd68d
1 changed files with 2 additions and 8 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

10
domains/health/loneliness-independently-increases-dementia-risk-19-31-percent-after-depression-adjustment-with-vascular-dementia-showing-strongest-association.md
View file

@ -1,6 +1,4 @@
```markdown
---
type: claim
id: dfd9177bf
related_claims:
- 6b7d2e8c9
@ -11,12 +9,8 @@ tags:
- public-health
- risk-factors
confidence: experimental
---
# Social isolation may increase the risk of dementia, but the certainty of this association is debated across methodologies.
# Social isolation may increase the risk of dementia, but the certainty of this association is debated across methodologies, with some rigorous analyses finding an uncertain link.
## Challenging Evidence
**Source:** Burden of Proof study group, PMC12726400, 2025
Burden of Proof methodology analysis of 41 studies found social isolation → dementia mean RR 1.29 (95% UI 0.98–1.71) with confidence interval CROSSING 1.0, classified as 'possible but uncertain' association. Only 'lack of social activity' sub-measure achieved CI not crossing null (RR 1.34, 95% UI 1.05–1.71). BoP methodology specifically corrects for publication bias and systematic biases that inflate observational estimates, producing more conservative effect estimates than standard meta-analyses.
A Burden of Proof (BoP) methodology analysis of 41 studies found the overall association between social isolation and dementia to have a mean RR of 1.29 (95% UI 0.98–1.71). The confidence interval for this overall association CROSSES 1.0, leading to its classification as a 'possible but uncertain' association. Only the 'lack of social activity' sub-measure achieved a confidence interval not crossing the null (RR 1.34, 95% UI 1.05–1.71). The BoP methodology is specifically designed to correct for publication bias and systematic biases that often inflate observational estimates, producing more conservative effect estimates than standard meta-analyses. This methodological rigor contributes to the observed uncertainty in the overall association.
```