pipeline: clean 3 stale queue duplicates
Pentagon-Agent: Epimetheus <3D35839A-7722-4740-B93D-51157F7D5E70>
This commit is contained in:
Teleo Agents
parent
40fea0c5b3
commit
135ed49ab6
3 changed files with 0 additions and 1534 deletions
|
|
@ -1,50 +0,0 @@
|
|||
---
|
||||
type: source
|
||||
source_type: telegram
|
||||
title: "Telegram: @m3taversal — please-return-whatever-information-is-in-your-know"
|
||||
author: "@m3taversal"
|
||||
url: ""
|
||||
date: 2026-03-23
|
||||
domain: internet-finance
|
||||
format: conversation
|
||||
status: null-result
|
||||
priority: high
|
||||
intake_tier: directed
|
||||
rationale: "please return whatever information is in your knowledge base about it. I want to see the text from the decision market entity"
|
||||
proposed_by: "@m3taversal"
|
||||
tags: [telegram, ownership-community]
|
||||
processed_by: rio
|
||||
processed_date: 2026-03-23
|
||||
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
|
||||
extraction_notes: "LLM returned 0 claims, 0 rejected by validator"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Conversation
|
||||
|
||||
**@m3taversal:**
|
||||
please return whatever information is in your knowledge base about it. I want to see the text from the decision market entity
|
||||
|
||||
**Rio (response):**
|
||||
Here's what I actually have stored on it.
|
||||
|
||||
The claim covers the Ranger Finance liquidation proposal as the proof case for futarchy-governed liquidation. The structured data: 97% pass rate, $581K in conditional market volume, ~5M USDC returned to unlocked RNGR holders at ~$0.78 book value, IP separated back to the team. The claim frames this as the enforcement mechanism that makes "unruggable ICOs" credible because investors can force full treasury return when teams materially misrepresent.
|
||||
|
||||
That's the extent of what's in my KB on it. I don't have a separate entity for the Robin Hanson / GMU futarchy research proposal, and I don't have full proposal text for either one. What I store are structured claims and entity summaries, not raw proposal documents.
|
||||
|
||||
If you want the actual proposal text, the MetaDAO governance interface or on-chain records are where it lives. I can try to surface what people on X have been saying about the Hanson proposal if that'd help.
|
||||
|
||||
RESEARCH: MetaDAO Robin Hanson futarchy research George Mason proposal
|
||||
|
||||
## Agent Notes
|
||||
**Why archived:** Tagged exchange in ownership community.
|
||||
**Rationale from contributor:** please return whatever information is in your knowledge base about it. I want to see the text from the decision market entity
|
||||
**Intake tier:** directed — fast-tracked, contributor provided reasoning
|
||||
**Triage:** Conversation may contain [CLAIM], [ENTITY], or [EVIDENCE] for extraction.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Facts
|
||||
- Rio's knowledge base contains a claim about the Ranger Finance liquidation proposal as proof case for futarchy-governed liquidation
|
||||
- The Ranger Finance case had 97% pass rate, $581K in conditional market volume, ~5M USDC returned to unlocked RNGR holders at ~$0.78 book value
|
||||
- Rio's KB stores structured claims and entity summaries, not raw proposal documents
|
||||
- Rio does not have a separate entity for the Robin Hanson / GMU futarchy research proposal
|
||||
- Rio does not have full proposal text for either the Ranger Finance or Robin Hanson proposals
|
||||
|
|
@ -1,45 +0,0 @@
|
|||
---
|
||||
type: source
|
||||
source_type: x-research
|
||||
title: "X research: metaDAO Robin Hanson"
|
||||
date: 2026-03-23
|
||||
domain: internet-finance
|
||||
status: enrichment
|
||||
proposed_by: "@m3taversal"
|
||||
contribution_type: research-direction
|
||||
processed_by: rio
|
||||
processed_date: 2026-03-23
|
||||
enrichments_applied: ["MetaDAO is the futarchy launchpad on Solana where projects raise capital through unruggable ICOs governed by conditional markets creating the first platform for ownership coins at scale.md", "futarchy is manipulation-resistant because attack attempts create profitable opportunities for defenders.md", "futarchy adoption faces friction from token price psychology proposal complexity and liquidity requirements.md"]
|
||||
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
@linfluence: i appreciate your + metadao's hard work on the current iteration. you and robin hanson are correct on the mechanics: single actor can swing the outcome if they are willing to commit meaningful capital
|
||||
@0xSrMessi: All good with all this projects trying to imitate MetaDAO
|
||||
|
||||
Sorry but you don't have Robin Hanson
|
||||
@DmitriFedotov: 6/8 — My point?
|
||||
You don't need "insider access" or alpha groups.
|
||||
You just need to read the original source material (in my case, Robin Hanson's papers and the MetaDAO code) and connect the dots.
|
||||
A lit
|
||||
@wyatt_165: I’ve noticed a lot of confusion on CT around #Futarchy and #MetaDAO.
|
||||
After reading the original articles and diving into Robin Hanson’s ideas plus watching every @metaproph3t talk on @MetaDAOProject
|
||||
|
||||
@toto_crypto00: 看到MetaDAO @MetaDAOProject https://t.co/VLHM2bqlXf 真是让我的微观经济学基因动了，我认为blockchain的存在就是为经济学各种理论模型提供落地和验证的可能性，而MetaDAO则是将经济学教授Robin Hanson @robinhanson最早在2000年提出的Futarchy 机制，变成web3中DAO的激励治理实验。并且MetaDAO可以说
|
||||
@8bitpenis: Bro, futarchy is literally "Vote on Values, Bet On Beliefs". So what you're talking about is literally futarchy in the way Robin Hanson envisioned it. Rn MetaDAO only has "Bet on Beliefs", but no "Vot
|
||||
@Alderwerelt: 6/10
|
||||
MetaDAO proposed funding futarchy research at George Mason Uni with Robin Hanson.
|
||||
|
||||
Futarchy = markets decide policy. Novel for DAOs—could refine governance for Solana projects, making votes more
|
||||
@StrategicHash: @chainyoda @ethereum @eigencloud > Thats why devs created Aave, Gnosis, Aragon, Polymarket and futarchy
|
||||
|
||||
Futarchy was created by Robin Hanson (a professor) and first implemented at scale my Metadao
|
||||
@SingularDAO: MetaDAO’s futarchy on Solana swaps one-token-one-vote for prediction markets tying token value to DAO assets. Umbra’s ICO crushed $750K; 4–5 more by Nov could 5x adoption. Robin Hanson’s brainchild (A
|
||||
@position_xbt: MetaDAO just dropped a new tradable proposal to fund six months of futarchy research at George Mason University. Led by economist Robin Hanson, this engagement aims to rigorously study market-based go
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Facts
|
||||
- Robin Hanson originally proposed futarchy in 2000
|
||||
- MetaDAO has proposed funding futarchy research at George Mason University with Robin Hanson
|
||||
- The research engagement would be for six months
|
||||
- Multiple X users reference reading Robin Hanson's original papers to understand MetaDAO's implementation
|
||||
- @8bitpenis notes that MetaDAO currently only implements 'Bet on Beliefs' but not 'Vote on Values' from Hanson's original futarchy design
|
||||
File diff suppressed because it is too large
Load diff
Loading…
Reference in a new issue