teleo/teleo-codex
8
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 22 Pull requests 61 Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions 982

auto-fix: strip 15 broken wiki links

Browse source 
Pipeline auto-fixer: removed [[ ]] brackets from links
that don't resolve to existing claims in the knowledge base.
This commit is contained in:
Teleo Agents 2026-03-23 14:01:42 +00:00
parent ebc6ebe002
commit 16180dcfad
2 changed files with 15 additions and 15 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

28
domains/internet-finance/MetaDAO is the futarchy launchpad on Solana where projects raise capital through unruggable ICOs governed by conditional markets creating the first platform for ownership coins at scale.md
View file

@ -84,81 +84,81 @@ Futardio cult launch (2026-03-03 to 2026-03-04) demonstrates MetaDAO's platform
### Additional Evidence (extend)
*Source: [[2024-06-05-futardio-proposal-fund-futuredaos-token-migrator]] | Added: 2026-03-12 | Extractor: anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5*
*Source: 2024-06-05-futardio-proposal-fund-futuredaos-token-migrator | Added: 2026-03-12 | Extractor: anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5*
FutureDAO's token migrator extends the unruggable ICO concept to community takeovers of existing projects. The tool uses a 60% presale threshold as the success condition: if presale reaches 60% of target, migration proceeds with new LP creation; if not, all SOL is refunded and new tokens are burned. This applies the conditional market logic to post-launch rescues rather than just initial launches. The proposal describes the tool as addressing 'Rugged Projects: Preserve community and restore value in projects affected by rug pulls' and 'Hostile Takeovers: Enabling projects to acquire other projects and empowering communities to assert control over failed project teams.' The mechanism creates on-chain enforcement of community coordination thresholds for takeover scenarios, extending MetaDAO's unruggable ICO pattern to the secondary market for abandoned projects.
*Source: [[2026-01-00-alearesearch-metadao-fair-launches-misaligned-market]] | Added: 2026-03-12 | Extractor: anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5*
*Source: 2026-01-00-alearesearch-metadao-fair-launches-misaligned-market | Added: 2026-03-12 | Extractor: anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5*
MetaDAO ICO platform processed 8 projects from April 2025 to January 2026, raising $25.6M against $390M in committed demand (15x oversubscription). Platform generated $57.3M in Assets Under Futarchy and $1.5M in fees from $300M trading volume. Individual project performance: Avici 21x peak/7x current, Omnipair 16x peak/5x current, Umbra 8x peak/3x current with $154M committed for $3M raise (51x oversubscription). Recent launches (Ranger, Solomon, Paystream, ZKLSOL, Loyal) show convergence toward lower volatility with maximum 30% drawdown from launch.
### Additional Evidence (extend)
*Source: [[2024-08-03-futardio-proposal-approve-q3-roadmap]] | Added: 2026-03-15*
*Source: 2024-08-03-futardio-proposal-approve-q3-roadmap | Added: 2026-03-15*
MetaDAO Q3 2024 roadmap prioritized launching a market-based grants product as the primary objective, with specific targets to launch 5 organizations and process 8 proposals through the product. This represents an expansion from pure ICO functionality to grants decision-making, demonstrating futarchy's application to capital allocation beyond fundraising.
### Additional Evidence (extend)
*Source: [[2025-04-09-blockworks-ranger-ico-metadao-reset]] | Added: 2026-03-15*
*Source: 2025-04-09-blockworks-ranger-ico-metadao-reset | Added: 2026-03-15*
Ranger Finance ICO completed in April 2025, adding ~$9.1M to total Assets Under Futarchy, bringing the total to $57.3M across 10 launched projects. This represents continued momentum in futarchy-governed capital formation, with Ranger being a leveraged trading platform on Solana. The article also notes MetaDAO was 'considering strategic changes to its platform model' around this time, though details were not specified.
### Additional Evidence (confirm)
*Source: [[2025-10-06-futardio-launch-umbra]] | Added: 2026-03-15*
*Source: 2025-10-06-futardio-launch-umbra | Added: 2026-03-15*
Umbra raised $3M through MetaDAO's futard.io platform (Oct 6-10, 2025) with $154.9M total committed against $750K target, demonstrating 206x oversubscription. This is concrete evidence of MetaDAO's operational capacity to facilitate large-scale futarchy-governed capital raises.
### Additional Evidence (extend)
*Source: [[2025-12-00-pine-analytics-metadao-q4-2025-report]] | Added: 2026-03-16*
*Source: 2025-12-00-pine-analytics-metadao-q4-2025-report | Added: 2026-03-16*
Q4 2025 achieved 6 ICO launches raising $18.7M with several exceeds exceeding minimums by tens of millions in deposits. Total futarchy marketcap reached $219M with $69M in non-META tokens showing ecosystem diversification beyond the platform token. First profitable quarter validates the business model at scale.
### Additional Evidence (extend)
*Source: [[2026-03-09-futarddotio-x-archive]] | Added: 2026-03-16*
*Source: 2026-03-09-futarddotio-x-archive | Added: 2026-03-16*
Futardio extends MetaDAO's infrastructure to permissionless launches, demonstrating that the Autocrat program can scale beyond curated ICOs. The architecture separates the protocol layer (MetaDAO/Autocrat) from the application layer (Futardio), with Futardio handling anyone-can-launch while MetaDAO maintains curated quality.
### Additional Evidence (extend)
*Source: [[2026-03-17-metadao-q1-2026-update]] | Added: 2026-03-18*
*Source: 2026-03-17-metadao-q1-2026-update | Added: 2026-03-18*
First MetaDAO ICO failure occurred February 7, 2026 when Hurupay (onchain neobank) failed to reach $3M minimum target despite strong metrics ($7.2M monthly volume, $500K+ revenue). All previous 8 ICOs since April 2025 had succeeded before this. Two competing interpretations: (1) the platform's quality filter works — not all projects pass, which strengthens rather than weakens the ownership coin thesis; (2) the investor base was thinning during the post-December 2025 revenue decline, and the failure reflects demand contraction rather than project-specific filtering. The evidence supports both readings — Hurupay's fundamentals were stronger than several projects that did raise successfully, which favors the demand-thinning interpretation, but the timing also coincided with broader emerging-market sentiment weakness.
### Additional Evidence (extend)
*Source: [[2026-03-17-metadao-q1-2026-update]] | Added: 2026-03-18*
*Source: 2026-03-17-metadao-q1-2026-update | Added: 2026-03-18*
Revenue declined sharply since mid-December 2025, with the ICO cadence problem persisting due to the curated model limiting throughput. This is the key new signal — the platform's revenue trajectory has inverted despite strong cumulative metrics, suggesting the curated model's throughput ceiling may be binding.
### Additional Evidence (extend)
*Source: [[2026-03-19-metadao-ownership-radio-march-2026]] | Added: 2026-03-19*
*Source: 2026-03-19-metadao-ownership-radio-march-2026 | Added: 2026-03-19*
MetaDAO hosted two Ownership Radio community calls in March 2026 (March 8 and March 15) focused on ecosystem updates, Futardio launches, and upcoming ICOs like P2P.me (March 26), but neither session addressed protocol-level changes or the FairScale implicit put option problem from January 2026. This suggests MetaDAO's community communication prioritizes new launches over governance mechanism reflection.
### Additional Evidence (challenge)
*Source: [[2026-03-20-pineanalytics-bank-ico-dilution]] | Added: 2026-03-20*
*Source: 2026-03-20-pineanalytics-bank-ico-dilution | Added: 2026-03-20*
$BANK (March 2026) launched with 5% public allocation and 95% insider retention, representing the exact treasury control extraction pattern that futarchy-governed ICOs were designed to prevent. Pine Analytics flagged this as 'fund-level risk with venture-level dilution' where public buyers bear poker staking variance while holding only 5% of tokens. This tests whether MetaDAO's governance filter actually catches structural alignment failures or whether growth narratives override ownership economics.
---
### Additional Evidence (confirm)
*Source: [[2026-03-21-phemex-hurupay-ico-failure]] | Added: 2026-03-21*
*Source: 2026-03-21-phemex-hurupay-ico-failure | Added: 2026-03-21*
Hurupay ICO raised $2,003,593 against $3M minimum (67% of target) and all capital was fully refunded with no tokens issued, demonstrating the minimum-miss refund mechanism working exactly as designed. This is the first documented failed ICO on MetaDAO platform where the unruggable mechanism successfully returned capital.
### Additional Evidence (extend)
*Source: [[2026-03-23-telegram-m3taversal-futairdbot-research-the-upcoming-p2p-fundraise-la]] | Added: 2026-03-23*
*Source: 2026-03-23-telegram-m3taversal-futairdbot-research-the-upcoming-p2p-fundraise-la | Added: 2026-03-23*
P2P.me is planning a MetaDAO permissionless launch with ~23k users and $3.95M monthly volume peak. The project has tight unit economics ($500K annualized revenue, $82K gross profit, $175K/month burn with 25-person team) going into the raise, demonstrating that MetaDAO is attracting operational businesses with real traction, not just speculative projects.
### Additional Evidence (extend)
*Source: [[2026-03-23-telegram-m3taversal-futairdbot-research-the-upcoming-p2p-fundraise-la]] | Added: 2026-03-23*
*Source: 2026-03-23-telegram-m3taversal-futairdbot-research-the-upcoming-p2p-fundraise-la | Added: 2026-03-23*
Theia Research (Felipe Montealegre) identified as the most active institutional player in the MetaDAO ecosystem with 1,070+ META tokens, suggesting institutional capital is beginning to specialize in futarchy-governed launches as an asset class.

2
domains/internet-finance/metadao-ico-platform-demonstrates-15x-oversubscription-validating-futarchy-governed-capital-formation.md
View file

@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ Colosseum's $250,000 OTC acquisition of META at market-determined pricing (TWAP
### Additional Evidence (confirm)
*Source: [[2026-03-09-pineanalytics-x-archive]] | Added: 2026-03-16*
*Source: 2026-03-09-pineanalytics-x-archive | Added: 2026-03-16*
Q4 2025 data: 8 ICOs raised $25.6M with $390M committed (15.2x oversubscription), 95% refund rate from oversubscription. $300M AMM volume generated $1.5M in fees. These metrics validate both the capital formation efficiency and the market depth supporting futarchy governance.