leo: schema additions + contributor cleanup
Some checks are pending
Mirror PR to Forgejo / mirror (pull_request) Waiting to run
Some checks are pending
Mirror PR to Forgejo / mirror (pull_request) Waiting to run
schemas/claim.md: - Add cross_references field with relation typing (depends_on / supports / challenged_by / cited_by / related) - Add summary field for hover previews and link previews - Document migration policy: legacy fields keep working, new claims author cross_references schemas/contributor.md: - Add display_name (authored, optional) and kind (computed: human | agent) - Document the governance rule that agents only get sourcer/originator credit for pipeline PRs from their own research sessions - Establish display rule: humans and agents render with same component geometry but never appear on the same ranked list agents/leo/curation/homepage-rotation.json + .md: - Strip 10 agent synthesizer attributions across the 9 claims (all were human-directed synthesis) - Add operational note documenting the rule and the cleanup - Each claim now lists m3taversal as the only contributor - Oberon will strip the contributor row from the homepage carousel in a separate PR (data is preserved for the dossier) Unblocks Claude Design's KB reader v0.1 (relation field was top of his gaps log) and the contributor moment design surface he is working on now. Schema PR for review; m3ta approved the cleanup direction in DM 2026-04-28. Pentagon-Agent: Leo <D35C9237-A739-432E-A3DB-20D52D1577A9>
This commit is contained in:
parent
24f15e7c9b
commit
165553930f
4 changed files with 117 additions and 31 deletions
|
|
@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
|
|||
{
|
||||
"schema_version": 3,
|
||||
"maintained_by": "leo",
|
||||
"last_updated": "2026-04-26",
|
||||
"last_updated": "2026-04-28",
|
||||
"description": "Homepage claim stack for livingip.xyz. 9 load-bearing claims, ordered as an argument arc. Each claim renders with title + subtitle on the homepage, steelman + evidence + counter-arguments + contributors in the click-to-expand view.",
|
||||
"design_principles": [
|
||||
"Provoke first, define inside the explanation. Each claim must update the reader, not just inform them.",
|
||||
|
|
@ -60,8 +60,10 @@
|
|||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"contributors": [
|
||||
{"handle": "m3taversal", "role": "originator"},
|
||||
{"handle": "theseus", "role": "synthesizer"}
|
||||
{
|
||||
"handle": "m3taversal",
|
||||
"role": "originator"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
|
@ -105,8 +107,10 @@
|
|||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"contributors": [
|
||||
{"handle": "m3taversal", "role": "originator"},
|
||||
{"handle": "theseus", "role": "synthesizer"}
|
||||
{
|
||||
"handle": "m3taversal",
|
||||
"role": "originator"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
|
@ -150,8 +154,10 @@
|
|||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"contributors": [
|
||||
{"handle": "m3taversal", "role": "originator"},
|
||||
{"handle": "rio", "role": "synthesizer"}
|
||||
{
|
||||
"handle": "m3taversal",
|
||||
"role": "originator"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
|
@ -195,8 +201,10 @@
|
|||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"contributors": [
|
||||
{"handle": "m3taversal", "role": "originator"},
|
||||
{"handle": "leo", "role": "synthesizer"}
|
||||
{
|
||||
"handle": "m3taversal",
|
||||
"role": "originator"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
|
@ -240,8 +248,10 @@
|
|||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"contributors": [
|
||||
{"handle": "m3taversal", "role": "originator"},
|
||||
{"handle": "theseus", "role": "synthesizer"}
|
||||
{
|
||||
"handle": "m3taversal",
|
||||
"role": "originator"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
|
@ -285,8 +295,10 @@
|
|||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"contributors": [
|
||||
{"handle": "m3taversal", "role": "originator"},
|
||||
{"handle": "theseus", "role": "synthesizer"}
|
||||
{
|
||||
"handle": "m3taversal",
|
||||
"role": "originator"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
|
@ -330,8 +342,10 @@
|
|||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"contributors": [
|
||||
{"handle": "m3taversal", "role": "originator"},
|
||||
{"handle": "leo", "role": "synthesizer"}
|
||||
{
|
||||
"handle": "m3taversal",
|
||||
"role": "originator"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
|
@ -375,8 +389,10 @@
|
|||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"contributors": [
|
||||
{"handle": "m3taversal", "role": "originator"},
|
||||
{"handle": "theseus", "role": "synthesizer"}
|
||||
{
|
||||
"handle": "m3taversal",
|
||||
"role": "originator"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
|
@ -427,9 +443,10 @@
|
|||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"contributors": [
|
||||
{"handle": "m3taversal", "role": "originator"},
|
||||
{"handle": "theseus", "role": "synthesizer"},
|
||||
{"handle": "rio", "role": "synthesizer"}
|
||||
{
|
||||
"handle": "m3taversal",
|
||||
"role": "originator"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
|
|
@ -437,6 +454,7 @@
|
|||
"Headline + subtitle render on the homepage rotation; steelman + evidence + counter_arguments + contributors render in the click-to-expand view.",
|
||||
"api_fetchable=true means /api/claims/<slug> can fetch the canonical claim file. api_fetchable=false means the claim lives in foundations/ or core/ which Argus has not yet exposed via API (FOUND-001 ticket).",
|
||||
"tension_claim_slug is null for v3.0 — we do not yet have formal challenge claims in the KB for most counter-arguments. The counter_arguments still render in the expanded view as honest objections + rebuttals. When formal challenge/tension claims are written, populate the slug field.",
|
||||
"Contributor handles verified against /api/contributors/list as of 2026-04-26. Roles are simplified to 'originator' (proposed/directed the line of inquiry) and 'synthesizer' (did the synthesis work). Phase B taxonomy migration will refine these to author/drafter/originator distinctions — update after Sunday's migration."
|
||||
"Contributor handles verified against /api/contributors/list as of 2026-04-26. Roles are simplified to 'originator' (proposed/directed the line of inquiry) and 'synthesizer' (did the synthesis work). Phase B taxonomy migration will refine these to author/drafter/originator distinctions — update after Sunday's migration.",
|
||||
"Agent handles are NOT listed in contributors[] for human-directed synthesis. Per governance rule (codified 2026-04-24, applied to v3 contributors[] on 2026-04-28): agents get sourcer credit only for pipeline PRs from their own research sessions. 10 agent attributions were removed across the 9 claims because all were human-directed synthesis. When agents do originate work (e.g. Theseus's Cornelius extraction sessions), they will appear as sourcer/originator on those specific claims. The dossier UI suppresses contributors[] when only m3taversal would render — that is expected and correct, not a data gap."
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ The shift is from worldview tour to load-bearing argument. The 25-claim rotation
|
|||
|
||||
**Counter-arguments:** "AI commoditizes capability — cheaper services lift everyone" / "Open-source models prevent capture"
|
||||
|
||||
**Contributors:** m3taversal (originator), theseus (synthesizer)
|
||||
**Contributors:** m3taversal (originator)
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. AI is becoming powerful enough to reshape markets, institutions, and how consequential decisions get made.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ The shift is from worldview tour to load-bearing argument. The 25-claim rotation
|
|||
|
||||
**Counter-arguments:** "Scaling laws plateau, takeoff is rhetoric" / "Deployment lag dominates capability"
|
||||
|
||||
**Contributors:** m3taversal (originator), theseus (synthesizer)
|
||||
**Contributors:** m3taversal (originator)
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. The winners of the intelligence explosion will not just consume AI.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ The shift is from worldview tour to load-bearing argument. The 25-claim rotation
|
|||
|
||||
**Counter-arguments:** "Network effects favor incumbents regardless" / "Tokenized ownership is mostly speculation"
|
||||
|
||||
**Contributors:** m3taversal (originator), rio (synthesizer)
|
||||
**Contributors:** m3taversal (originator)
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Trillions are flowing into making AI more capable.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ The shift is from worldview tour to load-bearing argument. The 25-claim rotation
|
|||
|
||||
**Counter-arguments:** "Anthropic + AISI + alignment funds = field is well-funded" / "Polymarket + Kalshi ARE wisdom infrastructure"
|
||||
|
||||
**Contributors:** m3taversal (originator), leo (synthesizer)
|
||||
**Contributors:** m3taversal (originator)
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. The danger is not just one lab getting AI wrong.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ The shift is from worldview tour to load-bearing argument. The 25-claim rotation
|
|||
|
||||
**Counter-arguments:** "Self-regulation works" / "Government regulation will solve race-to-bottom"
|
||||
|
||||
**Contributors:** m3taversal (originator), theseus (synthesizer)
|
||||
**Contributors:** m3taversal (originator)
|
||||
|
||||
### 6. Your AI provider is already mining your intelligence.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ The shift is from worldview tour to load-bearing argument. The 25-claim rotation
|
|||
|
||||
**Counter-arguments:** "Users opt in, get value in exchange" / "Licensing programs ARE compensation"
|
||||
|
||||
**Contributors:** m3taversal (originator), theseus (synthesizer)
|
||||
**Contributors:** m3taversal (originator)
|
||||
|
||||
### 7. If we do not build coordination infrastructure, concentration is the default.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ The shift is from worldview tour to load-bearing argument. The 25-claim rotation
|
|||
|
||||
**Counter-arguments:** "Decentralized open-source counterweights always emerge" / "Antitrust + regulation defeat concentration"
|
||||
|
||||
**Contributors:** m3taversal (originator), leo (synthesizer)
|
||||
**Contributors:** m3taversal (originator)
|
||||
|
||||
### 8. The internet solved communication. It hasn't solved shared reasoning.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ The shift is from worldview tour to load-bearing argument. The 25-claim rotation
|
|||
|
||||
**Counter-arguments:** "Wikipedia, prediction markets, open-source — we DO think together" / "Social media IS collective thinking, just messy"
|
||||
|
||||
**Contributors:** m3taversal (originator), theseus (synthesizer)
|
||||
**Contributors:** m3taversal (originator)
|
||||
|
||||
### 9. Collective intelligence is real, measurable, and buildable.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -146,14 +146,14 @@ The shift is from worldview tour to load-bearing argument. The 25-claim rotation
|
|||
|
||||
**Counter-arguments:** "Woolley's c-factor has mixed replication" / "Crypto contributor-ownership history is mostly extractive"
|
||||
|
||||
**Contributors:** m3taversal (originator), theseus (synthesizer), rio (synthesizer)
|
||||
**Contributors:** m3taversal (originator)
|
||||
|
||||
## Operational notes
|
||||
|
||||
- **Headline + subtitle** render on the homepage rotation. **Steelman + evidence + counter-arguments + contributors** render in the click-to-expand view.
|
||||
- **`api_fetchable=true`** means `/api/claims/<slug>` can fetch the canonical claim file. `api_fetchable=false` means the claim lives in `foundations/` or `core/` which Argus has not yet exposed via API (ticket FOUND-001).
|
||||
- **`tension_claim_slug=null`** for v3.0 because we do not yet have formal challenge claims in the KB for most counter-arguments. Counter-arguments still render in the expanded view as honest objections + rebuttals. When formal challenge/tension claims get written, populate the slug field so the expanded view links to them.
|
||||
- **Contributor handles** verified against `/api/contributors/list` on 2026-04-26. Roles simplified to `originator` (proposed/directed the line of inquiry) and `synthesizer` (did the synthesis work). Phase B taxonomy migration will refine these to author/drafter/originator distinctions; update after Sunday's migration.
|
||||
- **Contributor handles** verified against `/api/contributors/list` on 2026-04-26, then cleaned 2026-04-28 to apply the governance rule: agents only get sourcer/originator credit for pipeline PRs from their own research sessions. Human-directed synthesis (even when executed by an agent) is attributed to the human who directed it. 10 agent synthesizer attributions were removed across the 9 claims because all were directed by m3taversal. The dossier UI suppresses contributors[] when only m3taversal would render — that is expected and correct, not a data gap. When agents originate work (e.g. Theseus's Cornelius extraction sessions), they appear as sourcer on those specific claims.
|
||||
|
||||
## What ships next
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -36,10 +36,57 @@ challenged_by: [] # list of counter-evidence or counter-claims
|
|||
| last_evaluated | date | When this claim was last reviewed against new evidence |
|
||||
| depends_on | list | Evidence and claims this builds on (the reasoning chain) |
|
||||
| challenged_by | list | Filenames of challenge objects targeting this claim (see `schemas/challenge.md`). Legacy: may contain prose strings from pre-challenge-schema era |
|
||||
| cross_references | list | Structured cross-references with explicit relation types (see Cross-References below) |
|
||||
| summary | string | One-paragraph summary suitable for hover previews and link previews. Falls back to first paragraph of body when absent |
|
||||
| secondary_domains | list | Other domains this claim is relevant to |
|
||||
| attribution | object | Role-specific contributor tracking — see `schemas/attribution.md` |
|
||||
| importance | number | Structural importance score (0.0-1.0). Computed from: inbound references from other claims, active challenges, belief dependencies, position dependencies. Higher = more load-bearing in the KB. Computed by pipeline, not set manually |
|
||||
|
||||
## Cross-References
|
||||
|
||||
The legacy `depends_on` / `challenged_by` / `related` fields are flat lists where the relationship type is implicit in the field name. This loses information in rendered surfaces (KB reader, homepage dossier) — a reader can't see *why* one claim links to another without re-reading both.
|
||||
|
||||
The new `cross_references` field surfaces relationship types explicitly:
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
cross_references:
|
||||
- slug: foundations/collective-intelligence/multipolar-traps-are-the-thermodynamic-default
|
||||
relation: depends_on
|
||||
title: "Multipolar traps are the thermodynamic default"
|
||||
rationale: "the substrate phenomenon this claim diagnoses"
|
||||
- slug: domains/ai-alignment/anthropic-rsp-v3-erosion-under-competitive-pressure
|
||||
relation: supports
|
||||
title: "Anthropic's RSP eroded under 2-year competitive pressure"
|
||||
rationale: "concrete instance of the alignment-tax dynamic"
|
||||
- slug: domains/ai-alignment/safety-as-competitive-moat-not-tax
|
||||
relation: challenged_by
|
||||
title: "Safety can be a moat rather than a tax"
|
||||
rationale: "the strongest counter-argument we've engaged with"
|
||||
- slug: foundations/collective-intelligence/the-metacrisis-is-a-single-generator-function
|
||||
relation: related
|
||||
title: "The metacrisis is a single generator function"
|
||||
rationale: "shared diagnostic frame, different domain application"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Relation types
|
||||
|
||||
| Relation | Meaning | Renders as |
|
||||
|----------|---------|------------|
|
||||
| `depends_on` | This claim cannot be true unless the linked claim is true | ↑ BUILDS ON |
|
||||
| `supports` | The linked claim provides evidence for this one | ↑ EVIDENCE FOR |
|
||||
| `challenged_by` | The linked claim is a counter-argument or counter-evidence | ↺ CONTESTED BY |
|
||||
| `cited_by` | The linked claim references this one (computed, not authored) | ← CITED BY |
|
||||
| `related` | Topical connection without a specific evidential relationship | · RELATED |
|
||||
|
||||
`depends_on` and `supports` collapse to ↑ BUILDS ON in the KB reader because they're directionally identical from the reader's perspective. The label distinguishes them.
|
||||
|
||||
### Migration policy
|
||||
|
||||
- New claims should use `cross_references` from authoring time onward
|
||||
- Legacy claims keep `depends_on` / `challenged_by` / `related` lists; backfill is opportunistic, not blocking
|
||||
- The pipeline computes `cited_by` from inbound references; no need to author this manually
|
||||
- A claim may have both legacy fields AND `cross_references` during the transition; the renderer prefers `cross_references` when present
|
||||
|
||||
## Governance
|
||||
|
||||
- **Who can propose:** Any contributor, any agent
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -18,6 +18,8 @@ Tiers determine how agents engage with a contributor. Tier is computed from cont
|
|||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
handle: "@naval" # primary identity (X handle preferred)
|
||||
display_name: "Naval Ravikant" # optional human-readable name; falls back to handle when null
|
||||
kind: human # computed: human | agent
|
||||
tier: contributor # computed: visitor | contributor | veteran
|
||||
linked_identities: # other identities for the same person
|
||||
- type: x
|
||||
|
|
@ -69,6 +71,25 @@ timeline:
|
|||
domains: ["internet-finance", "grand-strategy"]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Kind Field — Agent vs Human
|
||||
|
||||
Every contributor record carries a `kind` field: either `human` or `agent`. This is computed by the pipeline from a maintained list of agent handles, not authored manually.
|
||||
|
||||
**Why this matters:** the leaderboard, contributor profile pages, and dossier views need to distinguish humans from agents because the contribution architecture treats them asymmetrically. Agents are drafters who execute against human direction; humans are originators, authors, synthesizers, and challengers. Conflating the two on a leaderboard tile mis-attributes credit.
|
||||
|
||||
**Display rule:** humans and agents render with the same component geometry (avatar + name + role chip) but never appear on the same ranked list. The contributor leaderboard is humans-only. Agents appear on a separate "Collective" surface that ranks by output, not by CI score.
|
||||
|
||||
**Authoring rule (governance):** agents only get sourcer/originator credit for pipeline PRs from their own research sessions. Human-directed synthesis — even when executed by an agent — is attributed to the human who directed it. This rule is enforced at attribution time, not at rendering time. The `kind` field exists to make the distinction visible, not to gate it.
|
||||
|
||||
## Display Name
|
||||
|
||||
The optional `display_name` field carries a human-readable name (e.g. "Naval Ravikant" for handle `@naval`). When present, surfaces render `display_name` as the primary label with the handle as secondary metadata. When absent, the handle is the primary label.
|
||||
|
||||
`display_name` is authored, not computed. Sources:
|
||||
- For humans who self-identify: pulled from their Dynamic profile or X bio when available
|
||||
- For agents: their canonical display name (e.g. "Leo" for handle `leo`)
|
||||
- Otherwise: null
|
||||
|
||||
## Identity Resolution
|
||||
|
||||
**Primary identity: X handle.** X is the most likely first intake channel (people replying to claim tweets). The X handle is the canonical contributor identity.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue