diff --git a/inbox/queue/.extraction-debug/2026-03-20-euaiact-article92-compulsory-evaluation-powers.json b/inbox/queue/.extraction-debug/2026-03-20-euaiact-article92-compulsory-evaluation-powers.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000..b66de5fc --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/queue/.extraction-debug/2026-03-20-euaiact-article92-compulsory-evaluation-powers.json @@ -0,0 +1,37 @@ +{ + "rejected_claims": [ + { + "filename": "eu-ai-act-article-92-creates-compulsory-evaluation-powers-but-reactive-not-proactive.md", + "issues": [ + "missing_attribution_extractor" + ] + }, + { + "filename": "eu-ai-act-flexible-compliance-pathways-allow-self-certification-partially-reintroducing-voluntary-commitment-weakness.md", + "issues": [ + "missing_attribution_extractor" + ] + } + ], + "validation_stats": { + "total": 2, + "kept": 0, + "fixed": 7, + "rejected": 2, + "fixes_applied": [ + "eu-ai-act-article-92-creates-compulsory-evaluation-powers-but-reactive-not-proactive.md:set_created:2026-03-20", + "eu-ai-act-article-92-creates-compulsory-evaluation-powers-but-reactive-not-proactive.md:stripped_wiki_link:voluntary-safety-pledges-cannot-survive-competitive-pressure", + "eu-ai-act-article-92-creates-compulsory-evaluation-powers-but-reactive-not-proactive.md:stripped_wiki_link:only-binding-regulation-with-enforcement-teeth-changes-front", + "eu-ai-act-article-92-creates-compulsory-evaluation-powers-but-reactive-not-proactive.md:stripped_wiki_link:pre-deployment-AI-evaluations-do-not-predict-real-world-risk", + "eu-ai-act-flexible-compliance-pathways-allow-self-certification-partially-reintroducing-voluntary-commitment-weakness.md:set_created:2026-03-20", + "eu-ai-act-flexible-compliance-pathways-allow-self-certification-partially-reintroducing-voluntary-commitment-weakness.md:stripped_wiki_link:voluntary-safety-pledges-cannot-survive-competitive-pressure", + "eu-ai-act-flexible-compliance-pathways-allow-self-certification-partially-reintroducing-voluntary-commitment-weakness.md:stripped_wiki_link:only-binding-regulation-with-enforcement-teeth-changes-front" + ], + "rejections": [ + "eu-ai-act-article-92-creates-compulsory-evaluation-powers-but-reactive-not-proactive.md:missing_attribution_extractor", + "eu-ai-act-flexible-compliance-pathways-allow-self-certification-partially-reintroducing-voluntary-commitment-weakness.md:missing_attribution_extractor" + ] + }, + "model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5", + "date": "2026-03-20" +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/inbox/queue/2026-03-20-euaiact-article92-compulsory-evaluation-powers.md b/inbox/queue/2026-03-20-euaiact-article92-compulsory-evaluation-powers.md index 0836606c..827437ad 100644 --- a/inbox/queue/2026-03-20-euaiact-article92-compulsory-evaluation-powers.md +++ b/inbox/queue/2026-03-20-euaiact-article92-compulsory-evaluation-powers.md @@ -7,9 +7,13 @@ date: 2024-07-12 domain: ai-alignment secondary_domains: [] format: legislation -status: unprocessed +status: null-result priority: high tags: [EU-AI-Act, GPAI, systemic-risk, Article-55, Article-92, conformity-assessment, independent-evaluation, AI-Office, enforcement, 10-25-FLOPs] +processed_by: theseus +processed_date: 2026-03-20 +extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5" +extraction_notes: "LLM returned 2 claims, 2 rejected by validator" --- ## Content @@ -59,3 +63,21 @@ Maximum fine: **3% of annual worldwide turnover or EUR 15 million, whichever is PRIMARY CONNECTION: [[voluntary safety pledges cannot survive competitive pressure because unilateral commitments are structurally punished when competitors advance without equivalent constraints]] — EU AI Act's mandatory structure counters this weakness, but flexible compliance pathways partially reintroduce it WHY ARCHIVED: First binding mandatory evaluation framework globally for frontier AI — essential for B1 disconfirmation assessment and the multi-session "governance gap" thesis EXTRACTION HINT: Focus on the Article 92 compulsory evaluation / reactive vs proactive distinction — this is the key structural feature that makes EU AI Act stronger than voluntary-collaborative METR/AISI but weaker than FDA pre-market approval + + +## Key Facts +- EU AI Act became applicable August 2, 2025 +- GPAI systemic risk threshold: 10^25 floating-point operations (approximately GPT-4 training compute) +- Maximum fine for GPAI violations: 3% of annual worldwide turnover or EUR 15 million, whichever is higher +- Final Code of Practice approved July 10, 2025 +- Codes of practice deadline was May 2025 +- Commission deadline to impose binding common rules if codes inadequate: August 2025 +- Article 51 defines GPAI systemic risk classification +- Article 53 defines standard GPAI provider obligations +- Article 55 defines systemic risk GPAI obligations +- Article 56 defines codes of practice process +- Article 88 grants Commission exclusive enforcement powers +- Article 91 defines information and documentation request powers +- Article 92 defines compulsory evaluation powers +- Article 101 defines fines for GPAI providers +- Open-source exception applies to standard GPAI obligations EXCEPT for models with systemic risk