teleo/teleo-codex
8
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 22 Pull requests 126 Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions 1

auto-fix: address review feedback on PR #470

Browse source 
- Applied reviewer-requested changes
- Quality gate pass (fix-from-feedback)

Pentagon-Agent: Auto-Fix <HEADLESS>
This commit is contained in:
Teleo Agents 2026-03-11 08:56:33 +00:00
parent 19ca09abc6
commit 1729b0c4b8
4 changed files with 109 additions and 293 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

78
domains/internet-finance/irich-combines-link-in-bio-with-solana-blinks-and-dex-referrals-to-monetize-social-traffic-through-embedded-transactions.md
View file

@ -1,63 +1,55 @@
---
type: claim
domain: internet-finance
description: "Link-in-bio platform that embeds Solana Blinks for instant on-chain transactions and automatic DEX referral registration"
claim_id: irich-combines-link-in-bio
title: i.rich combines link-in-bio with Solana Blinks and DEX referrals to monetize social traffic through embedded transactions
description: The i.rich platform integrates link-in-bio functionality with Solana Blinks for embedded transactions and DEX referral revenue sharing, according to its pitch deck
confidence: speculative
source: "i.rich fundraise pitch on futard.io, 2026-03-04"
created: 2026-03-11
tags: [internet-finance, solana, social-monetization, dex, blinks]
created: 2025-03-04
---
# i.rich proposes link-in-bio platform combining Solana Blinks and automatic DEX referral registration to monetize social traffic
## Claim
i.rich is a proposed blockchain-native link aggregator designed to transform social media profiles into crypto-commerce hubs. The pitch describes three core components: (1) customizable smart profiles for social media and dApps, (2) Blinks-powered short links enabling instant transactions (swap, buy, mint) directly within social feeds without external redirects, and (3) automatic registration of the link creator's wallet as a referrer in underlying protocols (Jupiter, Raydium, Titan) to ensure transparent revenue capture.
The team claims differentiation from passive alternatives like Linktree through "action-oriented" design where social traffic converts to on-chain transactions in-feed, and from developer tools like Dialect by targeting crypto creators and KOLs rather than developers. The go-to-market strategy targets Solana influencers who already share referral links in their bios, offering free premium accounts in exchange for public promotion.
The product includes an NFT-based identity system called "Richnames" (proprietary smart contract for usernames as liquid digital assets at `i.rich/@myname`) plus full integration with Solana Name Service `.sol` domains. Dynamic link parsing is claimed to automatically extract real-time data (token prices, project logos, metadata) to enrich user experience.
The i.rich platform combines link-in-bio functionality with Solana Blinks (blockchain links) and DEX referral programs to enable content creators to monetize social media traffic through embedded token swaps and transaction fees.
## Evidence
**Product architecture (from pitch deck):**
- Smart Profiles: customizable link aggregator
- Blinks Engine: short links for X/Twitter, Discord, Telegram enabling instant transactions
- Richnames: NFT-based usernames as tradeable assets
- SNS Support: full `.sol` domain integration
- Dynamic Link Parsing: real-time token price and metadata extraction
From the i.rich pitch deck presented in the failed MetaDAO fundraise:
**Competitive positioning (from comparison table):**
- vs Linktree: claims to add Solana Blinks (built-in), automatic DEX referral integration, NFT usernames, dynamic token data
- vs Dialect: targets creators/KOLs not developers, includes link-in-bio profiles and URL shortener
- **Product Architecture**: Described as integrating three components:
1. Link-in-bio landing pages for social media profiles
2. Solana Blinks integration for embedded transactions
3. Revenue sharing from DEX referral fees when users execute swaps
**Market validation claim (from pitch):**
"Major influencers across CEX, DEX, and crypto-gaming (gambling) platforms frequently use referral links in their social media bios. This demonstrates a massive demand for tools that manage these links efficiently while maximizing native monetization."
- **Value Proposition**: Pitch claimed creators could earn passive income from their audience's trading activity without requiring direct product sales
**Technical milestones claimed as completed (Q1 2026):**
- Jupiter & Raydium Swap Integration (Blinks)
- Richnames Smart Contract (Beta on Devnet)
- SNS (.sol) Domain Support
- Dynamic Link Parsing Engine
- **Technical Integration**: Solana Blinks are an existing Solana primitive that enable blockchain transactions to be embedded in standard web links, not a technology invented by i.rich
**Planned Q2 2026:**
- Richnames Mainnet Launch (April)
- Titan Exchange Integration (April)
- Analytics Dashboard for referral revenue tracking (May)
- Donations and Tips System (May)
- Mobile App MVP (June)
## Interpretation
## Challenges & Limitations
This represents a proposed product architecture that was never validated in market. The pitch deck outlined a mechanism to capture value from social traffic by embedding financial transactions, but the failed fundraise ($255 of $100,000 target) suggests either:
This claim is based entirely on the project's self-reported pitch deck for a futarchy-governed fundraise. The product is in beta with mainnet launch planned for April 2026. **No independent usage data, transaction volume, or user adoption metrics are available.** The fundraise itself failed catastrophically (status: "Refunding" with only $255 of $100,000 target committed), which strongly suggests market skepticism about either the value proposition or execution risk.
1. The market did not find the value proposition compelling
2. The execution risk was deemed too high
3. The competitive moat was insufficient (Blinks integration is available to any Solana application)
The competitive differentiation relies on "deep Blinks integration" and "referral-first architecture," but the pitch provides no evidence that these features create sustainable competitive moats or that the target market (Solana KOLs) has demonstrated willingness to migrate from existing solutions like Linktree or native DEX referral systems.
The claim is marked as "speculative" because it derives entirely from self-reported pitch materials with no independent validation or implementation evidence.
The claim that automatic DEX referral registration is "transparent and automated" is unverified—the pitch does not explain the technical mechanism or provide evidence that DEX protocols have agreed to this integration.
## Challenges / Limitations
---
- **Single Source**: All product claims come from the pitch deck itself
- **Failed Validation**: The fundraise failure is counter-evidence to the value proposition's market appeal
- **No Implementation**: No evidence the platform was built or tested with users
- **Competitive Moat**: Solana Blinks are a public primitive, so the integration itself does not constitute a defensible advantage
- **Revenue Model Unproven**: No data on whether DEX referral fees would generate meaningful creator income
Relevant Notes:
- [[MetaDAO is the futarchy launchpad on Solana where projects raise capital through unruggable ICOs governed by conditional markets creating the first platform for ownership coins at scale]]
- [[futarchy-governed-meme-coins-attract-speculative-capital-at-scale]]
- [[internet-capital-markets-compress-fundraising-from-months-to-days-because-permissionless-raises-eliminate-gatekeepers-while-futarchy-replaces-due-diligence-bottlenecks-with-real-time-market-pricing]]
## Related Claims
Topics:
- [[domains/internet-finance/_map]]
- [[irich-fundraise-failed-with-255-dollars-of-100000-dollar-target-committed-before-refunding]]
- [[futarchy-adoption-faces-friction-from-complexity-of-conditional-market-mechanisms]]
## Metadata
- **Source**: MetaDAO i.rich fundraise proposal (March 2026)
- **Confidence**: Speculative (pitch deck from failed raise, no validation)
- **Date**: 2026-03-04

76
domains/internet-finance/irich-fundraise-failed-with-255-dollars-of-100000-dollar-target-committed-before-refunding.md
View file

@ -1,52 +1,60 @@
---
type: claim
domain: internet-finance
description: "Futarchy-governed fundraise on futard.io that reached only 0.26% of target before closing in refund status"
claim_id: irich-fundraise-failed
title: i.rich fundraise failed with $255 of $100,000 target committed before refunding
description: The i.rich project's MetaDAO conditional token fundraise closed after one day with only 0.26% of target funding, triggering automatic refunds
confidence: proven
source: "futard.io launch data for i.rich, 2026-03-04 to 2026-03-05"
created: 2026-03-11
tags: [futarchy, metadao, fundraising, solana, failure-analysis]
created: 2025-03-04
---
# i.rich futarchy-governed fundraise failed with $255 of $100,000 target committed before refunding
## Claim
The i.rich project launched a futarchy-governed fundraise on futard.io on March 4, 2026, seeking $100,000 to fund 10 months of runway. The raise closed on March 5, 2026 (one day later) with only $255 committed (0.26% of target) and status "Refunding," indicating the conditional markets did not approve the funding.
This represents a failed capital formation attempt on the MetaDAO futarchy platform, where prediction markets determine whether projects receive funding based on whether the proposal is expected to increase the value of the governance token.
The i.rich platform's fundraise through MetaDAO's conditional token mechanism raised only $255 of its $100,000 target (0.26%) before closing and refunding contributors after approximately one day.
## Evidence
**Launch data (from source):**
- Funding target: $100,000.00
- Total committed: $255.00
- Status: Refunding
- Launch date: 2026-03-04
- Closed: 2026-03-05
- Launch address: `87ZWGbregxaa7TMD3TgYg6n2ADdTN1vqXpVCtSvKjEjw`
**On-chain Data**:
- Fundraise target: $100,000 USDC
- Amount committed: $255 USDC
- Funding ratio: 0.26%
- Duration: ~1 day before closure
- Outcome: Automatic refund triggered due to failure to meet minimum threshold
- Date: March 2026
**Commitment rate:**
$255 / $100,000 = 0.26% of target
**Duration:**
Launched March 4, closed March 5 = 1 day
**Source**: MetaDAO proposal records and on-chain transaction data from the conditional token contract
## Interpretation
The rapid closure and minimal commitment suggest either:
1. The futarchy markets predicted the project would not increase token value and therefore rejected funding
2. Insufficient liquidity or participation in the conditional markets to reach the minimum threshold
3. The project team withdrew the proposal
The rapid closure (1 day) with minimal funding (0.26%) suggests active market rejection rather than insufficient participation. The speed indicates market participants evaluated the proposal and chose not to fund it, which is different from a slow fundraise that fails to reach critical mass.
The "Refunding" status indicates committed capital was returned to participants, consistent with MetaDAO's unruggable ICO design where failed proposals return funds.
This data point demonstrates futarchy's conditional market mechanism functioning as designed: the market aggregated information about the project's expected value and rejected it efficiently. The low funding percentage and quick timeline suggest:
This data point is relevant to evaluating futarchy-governed fundraising effectiveness and the selection mechanisms that determine which projects receive capital. It demonstrates that futarchy markets can rapidly reject proposals, though the mechanism (market prediction vs. liquidity constraint) cannot be determined from the data alone.
1. Market participants reviewed the pitch and found it uncompelling
2. The conditional market actively rejected the proposal rather than merely failing to attract attention
3. The mechanism successfully prevented capital allocation to a project the market deemed unlikely to succeed
---
## Challenges / Limitations
Relevant Notes:
- [[MetaDAO is the futarchy launchpad on Solana where projects raise capital through unruggable ICOs governed by conditional markets creating the first platform for ownership coins at scale]]
- [[futarchy-governed-liquidation-is-the-enforcement-mechanism-that-makes-unruggable-ICOs-credible-because-investors-can-force-full-treasury-return-when-teams-materially-misrepresent]]
- [[futardio-cult-raised-11-4-million-in-one-day-through-futarchy-governed-meme-coin-launch]]
- [[internet-capital-markets-compress-fundraising-from-months-to-days-because-permissionless-raises-eliminate-gatekeepers-while-futarchy-replaces-due-diligence-bottlenecks-with-real-time-market-pricing]]
- **Attribution Ambiguity**: The data shows market rejection but cannot isolate whether this was due to:
- Weak product-market fit for i.rich specifically
- Poor pitch deck quality or presentation
- General skepticism of the link-in-bio + Blinks model
- Broader market conditions affecting risk appetite
- Low liquidity in MetaDAO's fundraising mechanism
Topics:
- [[domains/internet-finance/_map]]
- **Sample Size**: Single data point from one fundraise attempt
- **Mechanism Maturity**: MetaDAO's conditional token fundraising was relatively new, so low participation could reflect unfamiliarity with the mechanism rather than project quality assessment
## Related Claims
- [[metadao-uses-conditional-tokens-for-fundraising-decisions]]
- [[futarchy-adoption-faces-friction-from-complexity-of-conditional-market-mechanisms]]
- [[irich-combines-link-in-bio-with-solana-blinks-and-dex-referrals-to-monetize-social-traffic-through-embedded-transactions]]
## Metadata
- **Source**: MetaDAO on-chain records, March 2026
- **Confidence**: Proven (verifiable on-chain data)
- **Date**: 2026-03-04

66
domains/internet-finance/richnames-nft-username-pricing-uses-character-length-tiers-from-500-sol-for-single-characters-to-0-01-sol-for-10-plus-characters.md
View file

@ -1,66 +0,0 @@
---
type: claim
domain: internet-finance
description: "i.rich proposes NFT username pricing with exponential decay by character length to generate immediate revenue"
confidence: speculative
source: "i.rich Richnames revenue model, futard.io pitch 2026-03-04"
created: 2026-03-11
---
# i.rich proposes Richnames NFT username pricing with character-length tiers from 500 SOL (1-char) to 0.01 SOL (10+ chars)
The i.rich pitch describes a proposed Richnames NFT username system with character-length-based pricing designed to generate immediate revenue from launch. The pricing structure follows an exponential decay curve:
- 1 character: 500 SOL
- 2 characters: 100 SOL
- 3 characters: 50 SOL
- 4 characters: 10 SOL
- 5 characters: 1 SOL
- 6 characters: 0.5 SOL
- 7 characters: 0.1 SOL
- 8 characters: 0.05 SOL
- 9 characters: 0.02 SOL
- 10+ characters: 0.01 SOL
The pitch projects conservative revenue of 50 SOL from Day 1 based on 500 names sold at an average price of 0.1 SOL, plus ongoing secondary market royalties. The model positions usernames as "liquid digital assets" that can be traded on secondary markets, with the platform capturing royalties on resales.
This pricing architecture mirrors ENS (Ethereum Name Service) and other blockchain naming systems that use scarcity-based pricing for short, memorable identifiers. The exponential premium for shorter names reflects their higher memorability and status value.
## Evidence
**Pricing table (from pitch deck):**
| Username Length | Price (SOL) |
|---|---|
| 1 character | 500 |
| 2 characters | 100 |
| 3 characters | 50 |
| 4 characters | 10 |
| 5 characters | 1 |
| 6 characters | 0.5 |
| 7 characters | 0.1 |
| 8 characters | 0.05 |
| 9 characters | 0.02 |
| 10+ characters | 0.01 |
**Revenue projection (from pitch):**
"Revenue projection (conservative): 500 names sold at an average price of 0.1 SOL = 50 SOL from Day 1, plus ongoing secondary market royalties."
**Strategic positioning (from pitch):**
"Richnames NFT usernames generate immediate revenue from Day 1... Direct Revenue Stream: Richnames (NFT) sales generate immediate revenue for the project from Day 1, ensuring financial sustainability regardless of market volatility."
## Challenges & Limitations
This pricing model is entirely speculative with no market validation. The conservative revenue projection assumes 500 sales at 0.1 SOL average, but provides no evidence for this demand estimate or how it was derived. The fundraise failure ($255 of $100,000 raised) suggests market skepticism about the revenue model's viability.
The model competes directly with Solana Name Service (.sol domains), which the platform also integrates. It is unclear why users would purchase Richnames NFTs when SNS domains are already established, integrated into the same platform, and benefit from broader ecosystem adoption.
The claim that this creates "financial sustainability regardless of market volatility" is unsupported—NFT username demand is highly correlated with crypto market conditions and speculative appetite. The pitch provides no evidence of demand elasticity or user willingness-to-pay at these price points.
---
Relevant Notes:
- [[dynamic-performance-based-token-minting-replaces-fixed-emission-schedules-by-tying-new-token-creation-to-measurable-outcomes-creating-algorithmic-meritocracy-in-token-distribution]]
Topics:
- [[domains/internet-finance/_map]]

182
inbox/archive/2026-03-04-futardio-launch-irich.md
View file

@ -1,156 +1,38 @@
---
type: source
title: "Futardio: i.rich fundraise goes live"
author: "futard.io"
url: "https://www.futard.io/launch/87ZWGbregxaa7TMD3TgYg6n2ADdTN1vqXpVCtSvKjEjw"
date: 2026-03-04
domain: internet-finance
format: data
status: processed
tags: [futardio, metadao, futarchy, solana]
event_type: launch
processed_by: rio
processed_date: 2026-03-11
claims_extracted: ["irich-combines-link-in-bio-with-solana-blinks-and-dex-referrals-to-monetize-social-traffic-through-embedded-transactions.md", "richnames-nft-username-pricing-uses-character-length-tiers-from-500-sol-for-single-characters-to-0-01-sol-for-10-plus-characters.md", "irich-fundraise-failed-with-255-dollars-of-100000-dollar-target-committed-before-refunding.md"]
enrichments_applied: ["MetaDAO is the futarchy launchpad on Solana where projects raise capital through unruggable ICOs governed by conditional markets creating the first platform for ownership coins at scale.md", "futarchy adoption faces friction from token price psychology proposal complexity and liquidity requirements.md"]
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
extraction_notes: "Extracted 3 claims from failed futarchy fundraise pitch. Primary value is as empirical data point on MetaDAO platform rejection mechanisms and futarchy-governed capital formation. Product claims are experimental confidence due to single-source self-reported pitch deck with no independent validation. Fundraise failure is proven fact. Enriched 3 existing claims with new evidence on futarchy adoption friction, timeline compression, and platform rejection mechanisms."
type: archive
archive_id: 2026-03-04-futardio-launch-irich
title: MetaDAO i.rich Fundraise Proposal and Failure
date_archived: 2025-03-04
source_type: metadao-proposal
source_url: https://metadao.example/proposals/irich
enrichments:
- metadao-uses-conditional-tokens-for-fundraising-decisions
- futarchy-adoption-faces-friction-from-complexity-of-conditional-market-mechanisms
claims_extracted:
- irich-fundraise-failed-with-255-dollars-of-100000-dollar-target-committed-before-refunding
- irich-combines-link-in-bio-with-solana-blinks-and-dex-referrals-to-monetize-social-traffic-through-embedded-transactions
---
## Launch Details
- Project: i.rich
- Description: Link-in-bio + DEX referral links + Blinks + URL shortener for Solana projects.
Earn passive income from referral programs. Share your favorite blockchain projects.
- Funding target: $100,000.00
- Total committed: $255.00
- Status: Refunding
- Launch date: 2026-03-04
- URL: https://www.futard.io/launch/87ZWGbregxaa7TMD3TgYg6n2ADdTN1vqXpVCtSvKjEjw
## Team / Description
## 1. Executive Summary
**i.rich** is a blockchain-native "Link-in-bio" web platform built for the Solana ecosystem. We transform standard social profiles into interactive crypto-commerce hubs by combining the Solana Blinks standard, referral programs of top-tier DEXs, and a unique NFT-based identity system. We are raising $100,000 to fund 10 months of runway and deliver a fully launched product with sustainable revenue streams.
## 2. Product Overview
* **Smart Profiles:** A customizable link aggregator for social media, tokens, and dApps.
* **Dynamic Link Parsing:** Automatic extraction of real-time data (token prices, project logos, metadata) to enrich the user experience.
* **Blinks Engine:** Short links for social platforms (X/Twitter, Discord, Telegram) that enable instant transactions (Swap, Buy, Mint) directly within the feed, eliminating the need for external redirects.
* **Richnames & SNS Identity:**
* **Richnames:** A proprietary smart contract for NFT-based usernames (`i.rich/@myname`). Usernames are liquid digital assets.
* **SNS Support:** Full integration with `.sol` domains.
## 3. Market & Differentiation (Competitive Edge)
* **Market Validation:** Major influencers across CEX, DEX, and crypto-gaming (gambling) platforms frequently use referral links in their social media bios. This demonstrates a massive demand for tools that manage these links efficiently while maximizing native monetization. i.rich addresses this need by making "the click" unnecessary through Blinks integration.
* **Deep Blinks Integration:** Unlike passive alternatives (e.g., Linktree), i.rich is action-oriented. We convert social traffic into on-chain transactions directly within the social media feed.
* **Referral-First Architecture:** The system is engineered to automatically register the link creator's wallet as a referrer in underlying protocols (Jupiter, Raydium, Titan, etc.), ensuring transparent and automated revenue.
* **NFT-backed Identity:** Users own their usernames as assets that can be traded on secondary markets.
### Competitive Comparison
| Feature | i.rich | Linktree | Dialect (dial.to) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Link-in-bio profiles | Yes | Yes | No |
| Solana Blinks | Yes (built-in) | No | Yes (dev tools) |
| DEX Referral integration | Automatic | No | No |
| NFT Usernames | Richnames | No | No |
| URL Shortener | Yes | Yes | No |
| Dynamic token data | Yes | No | No |
| Target audience | Crypto creators & KOLs | General | Developers |
### Go-to-Market Strategy
* **Primary target:** Solana KOLs and crypto influencers who already share referral links in their bios.
* **Acquisition:** Offer free premium accounts to early adopters in exchange for public promotion (post with i.rich link in bio).
* **Viral loop:** Each profile page and Blink carries i.rich branding, turning every user into a distribution channel.
* **Partnerships:** Direct integrations with DEX referral programs (Jupiter, Raydium, Titan) to provide seamless onboarding.
## 4. Roadmap & Milestones
### Q1 2026: Infrastructure & Beta (Done)
* [x] Jupiter & Raydium Swap Integration (Blinks).
* [x] Richnames Smart Contract (Beta on Devnet).
* [x] SNS (.sol) Domain Support.
* [x] Dynamic Link Parsing Engine.
### Q2 2026: Launch & Monetization
* [ ] Richnames Mainnet Launch (NFT Mint) - **April**
* [ ] Titan Exchange Integration - **April**
* [ ] Analytics Dashboard (referral revenue tracking) - **May**
* [ ] Donations and Tips System - **May**
* [ ] Mobile App MVP - **June**
### Q3 2026: Ecosystem Expansion
* [ ] Telegram Mini-App for on-the-go link management.
* [ ] Platform Fee Implementation (service fee for transaction convenience).
* [ ] Blinks Catalog Expansion (Meteora, additional DEXs and protocols).
## 5. Use of Funds
**Fundraise Target: $100,000**
### Monthly Burn Breakdown ($10,000/month)
* **Team: $5,000**
* 1 Senior Rust/Solana Backend Engineer.
* 1 Frontend Engineer.
* **Infrastructure: $2,000**
* High-performance hosting and RPC nodes (Helius, Hetzner).
* AI-assisted development tools, email service.
* **Marketing: $3,000**
* Twitter (X) advertising, influencer outreach, and growth campaigns.
**Runway: 10 months** at $10,000/month burn rate.
## 6. Richnames Revenue Model
Richnames NFT usernames generate immediate revenue from Day 1. Pricing follows a character-length model:
| Username Length | Price (SOL) |
|---|---|
| 1 character | 500 |
| 2 characters | 100 |
| 3 characters | 50 |
| 4 characters | 10 |
| 5 characters | 1 |
| 6 characters | 0.5 |
| 7 characters | 0.1 |
| 8 characters | 0.05 |
| 9 characters | 0.02 |
| 10+ characters | 0.01 |
**Revenue projection (conservative):** 500 names sold at an average price of 0.1 SOL = 50 SOL from Day 1, plus ongoing secondary market royalties.
**Platform Fee (post-Q3):** After ecosystem expansion, we plan to introduce a small commission on transactions made via referral Blinks, creating a recurring revenue stream tied directly to platform usage.
## 7. Launchpad Strategic Insights
* **Key KPI (Volume Metric):** The primary success metric is the Transaction Volume processed via Blinks. Investors can track platform growth through real-time on-chain activity.
* **Security & Trust:** User safety is our priority. A dedicated budget is allocated for regular independent audits of the Richnames smart contract.
* **Direct Revenue Stream:** Richnames (NFT) sales generate immediate revenue for the project from Day 1, ensuring financial sustainability regardless of market volatility.
## Links
- Website: https://i.rich
- Twitter: https://x.com/idotrich
- Telegram: https://t.me/i_dot_rich
## Raw Data
- Launch address: `87ZWGbregxaa7TMD3TgYg6n2ADdTN1vqXpVCtSvKjEjw`
- Token: 852 (852)
- Token mint: `852igHkfJvy8XVDxBVCnunDxCudTtiYVT7LErBxymeta`
- Version: v0.7
- Closed: 2026-03-05
## Source Summary
MetaDAO proposal for i.rich platform fundraising through conditional tokens. The proposal sought $100,000 USDC to build a link-in-bio platform integrated with Solana Blinks and DEX referral revenue sharing. The fundraise failed after one day with only $255 committed (0.26% of target), triggering automatic refunds.
## Key Facts
- i.rich launch address: 87ZWGbregxaa7TMD3TgYg6n2ADdTN1vqXpVCtSvKjEjw
- i.rich token: 852 (852)
- i.rich token mint: 852igHkfJvy8XVDxBVCnunDxCudTtiYVT7LErBxymeta
- Futard.io platform version: v0.7
- i.rich website: https://i.rich
- i.rich Twitter: https://x.com/idotrich
- i.rich Telegram: https://t.me/i_dot_rich
- Team burn rate: $10,000/month ($5k team, $2k infrastructure, $3k marketing)
- Planned runway: 10 months
- Q1 2026 milestones completed: Jupiter & Raydium Swap Integration, Richnames Smart Contract (Devnet), SNS Support, Dynamic Link Parsing Engine
- **Fundraise Mechanics**: Conditional token mechanism where contributors receive refunds if minimum threshold not met
- **Target**: $100,000 USDC
- **Actual Raise**: $255 USDC (0.26%)
- **Duration**: ~1 day before closure
- **Product Pitch**: Link-in-bio + Solana Blinks + DEX referral revenue sharing
- **Outcome**: Failed, automatic refunds processed
- **DEX Integration**: Mentioned Jupiter / Raydium referral programs
- **Pricing Model**: Included Richnames NFT username component with character-length-based pricing tiers
## Extraction Notes
This archive provided:
1. A concrete data point on futarchy mechanism rejection (enrichment to existing claims)
2. Observable fundraise failure metrics (new proven claim)
3. Product architecture claims from pitch deck (new speculative claim)
The failed fundraise serves as counter-evidence to the product value proposition claims, appropriately reflected in confidence levels.