extract: 2024-05-30-futardio-proposal-drift-futarchy-proposal-welcome-the-futarchs

Pentagon-Agent: Ganymede <F99EBFA6-547B-4096-BEEA-1D59C3E4028A>
This commit is contained in:
Teleo Agents 2026-03-16 11:23:51 +00:00
parent fac8dfe39b
commit 17942ca245
4 changed files with 32 additions and 1 deletions

View file

@ -11,6 +11,12 @@ created: 2026-03-15
The Drift proposal establishes a 2/3 multisig execution group (metaprophet, Sumatt, Lmvdzande) to distribute the 50,000 DRIFT budget according to the outlined rules. Critically, the proposal grants this group discretion in two areas: (1) determining 'exact criteria' for the activity pool to filter non-organic participation, and (2) deciding which proposals qualify if successful proposals exceed the budget. The group also receives 3,000 DRIFT for their work and has authority to return excess funds to the treasury. This structure acknowledges that pure algorithmic distribution fails when faced with gaming, ambiguous cases, or unforeseen circumstances. The multisig provides a credible commitment mechanism - the proposal passes based on general principles, but execution requires human judgment. The group composition (known futarchy advocates) provides reputational accountability.
### Additional Evidence (confirm)
*Source: [[2024-05-30-futardio-proposal-drift-futarchy-proposal-welcome-the-futarchs]] | Added: 2026-03-16*
Drift proposal created 2/3 multisig 'executor group' (metaprophet, Sumatt, Lmvdzande) with explicit discretion to 'finalize exact criteria' for activity rewards and 'decide top N proposals to split' if successful proposals exceeded budget. Group received 3,000 DRIFT allocation and authority to return excess funds to treasury, demonstrating human override layer above algorithmic distribution.
---
Relevant Notes:

View file

@ -11,6 +11,12 @@ created: 2026-03-15
The Drift proposal structures proposer rewards with a three-month delay between proposal passage and token claim. Passing proposals earn up to 5,000 DRIFT each, but tokens are only claimable after three months. This delay creates a quality filter: proposers must believe their proposals will create sustained value that survives the vesting period. Without this delay, rational actors could spam low-quality proposals to extract rewards, knowing they can exit before negative effects manifest. The proposal also includes an executor group discretion clause - if successful proposals exceed expectations, the group can decide which top N proposals split the allocation. This combines time-based filtering with human judgment to prevent gaming. The 20,000 DRIFT activity pool uses the same three-month delay, with criteria finalized by the execution group to 'filter for non organic activity.'
### Additional Evidence (confirm)
*Source: [[2024-05-30-futardio-proposal-drift-futarchy-proposal-welcome-the-futarchs]] | Added: 2026-03-16*
Drift proposal allocated 10,000 DRIFT for successful proposers but made rewards 'claimable after 3 months' to prevent short-term gaming. Similarly, the 25,000 DRIFT activity pool required 3-month delay before distribution, demonstrating temporal separation between proposal passage and reward claiming.
---
Relevant Notes:

View file

@ -11,6 +11,12 @@ created: 2026-03-15
The Drift Futarchy incentive program explicitly uses retroactive token distribution to MetaDAO participants as a mechanism to bootstrap engagement. The proposal cites the endowment effect - the behavioral economics finding that people value things more highly once they own them - as the theoretical basis. By distributing 9,600 DRIFT to 32 MetaDAO participants based on historical activity (5+ interactions over 30+ days), plus 2,400 DRIFT to AMM swappers, the proposal creates a cohort of token holders who have psychological ownership before the futarchy system launches. This differs from standard airdrops by explicitly targeting demonstrated forecasters rather than broad distribution. The tiered structure (100-400 DRIFT based on META holdings) further segments by engagement level. The proposal pairs this with forward incentives (5,000 DRIFT per passing proposal, 20,000 DRIFT activity pool) to convert initial ownership into sustained participation.
### Additional Evidence (confirm)
*Source: [[2024-05-30-futardio-proposal-drift-futarchy-proposal-welcome-the-futarchs]] | Added: 2026-03-16*
Drift Futarchy proposal explicitly structured retroactive rewards to leverage endowment effect, distributing 9,600 DRIFT to 32 MetaDAO participants based on activity thresholds (5+ interactions over 30+ days) and META holdings tiers. The proposal text directly cites endowment effect Wikipedia article as theoretical justification for rewarding early participants with tokens to drive future engagement.
---
Relevant Notes:

View file

@ -6,9 +6,13 @@ url: "https://www.futard.io/proposal/9jAnAupCdPQCFvuAMr5ZkmxDdEKqsneurgvUnx7Az9z
date: 2024-05-30
domain: internet-finance
format: data
status: unprocessed
status: enrichment
tags: [futardio, metadao, futarchy, solana, governance]
event_type: proposal
processed_by: rio
processed_date: 2026-03-16
enrichments_applied: ["futarchy-retroactive-rewards-bootstrap-participation-through-endowment-effect.md", "futarchy-proposer-incentives-require-delayed-vesting-to-prevent-gaming.md", "futarchy-incentive-programs-use-multisig-execution-groups-as-discretionary-override.md"]
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
---
## Proposal Details
@ -107,3 +111,12 @@ In the event of uncertainty or excess budget, funds shall be returned to origina
- Autocrat version: 0.3
- Completed: 2024-06-02
- Ended: 2024-06-02
## Key Facts
- Drift Futarchy proposal requested 50,000 DRIFT tokens total
- 32 MetaDAO participants qualified for retroactive rewards based on 5+ interactions over 30+ days
- Proposal used May 19, 2024 UTC as eligibility cutoff date
- Executor multisig consisted of metaprophet, Sumatt, and Lmvdzande
- Proposal passed on 2024-06-02 after 3-day voting period
- Activity thresholds: < 1 META = 100 DRIFT, 1 META = 200 DRIFT, 10 META = 400 DRIFT