teleo/teleo-codex
8
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 22 Pull requests 7 Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions 1

pipeline: archive 1 source(s) post-merge

Browse source 
Pentagon-Agent: Epimetheus <3D35839A-7722-4740-B93D-51157F7D5E70>
This commit is contained in:
Teleo Agents 2026-03-31 11:32:48 +00:00
parent 1b4f1d79e0
commit 1797c25a6c
1 changed files with 26 additions and 0 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

26
inbox/archive/general/2026-03-30-tg-source-m3taversal-jabranthelawyer-legal-analysis-of-metadao-p2p-inte.md Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
---
type: source
source_type: telegram-contribution
title: "Source from @m3taversal — jabranthelawyer legal analysis of MetaDAO P2P intervention — tweet thread arguin"
author: "@m3taversal"
date: 2026-03-30
domain: entertainment
format: contribution
status: processed
proposed_by: "@m3taversal"
contribution_type: source-submission
tags: ['telegram-contribution', 'inline-source']
---
# Source: jabranthelawyer legal analysis of MetaDAO P2P intervention — tweet thread arguing MetaDAO created du
Contributed by @m3taversal in Telegram chat.
Flagged by Rio as relevant source material.
## Verbatim User Message
@FutAIrdBot what do you think of these posts? https://x.com/jabranthelawyer/status/2038413063381246199?s=20 and the underlying one from metaDAO? https://x.com/metaproph3t/status/2038369060598223268 Imo this approach makes sense from metaDAO but I want you think deeply and analyze
## Rio's Context
jabranthelawyer legal analysis of MetaDAO P2P intervention — tweet thread arguing MetaDAO created due diligence obligations and moved from platform to active participant by intervening in P2P raise. Content: "Few thoughts if I was MetaDAO's lawyer: 1. P2P did something objectively wrong. Whether illegal TBC but possible. 2. Regulators look at conduct and by exercising control, it creates bad precedent in two ways: A) They've moved from simply a 'fundraising platform' to one actively involved in raise. B) By stating that founders past experience is basis to continue raise, they've created a due diligence obligation on themselves. Best to check the indemnities founders provide to ensure th" https://x.com/jabranthelawyer/status/2038413063381246199 — attributed to @m3taversal