diff --git a/domains/internet-finance/memecoin-governance-is-ideal-futarchy-use-case-because-single-objective-function-eliminates-long-term-tradeoff-ambiguity.md b/domains/internet-finance/memecoin-governance-is-ideal-futarchy-use-case-because-single-objective-function-eliminates-long-term-tradeoff-ambiguity.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..90aad624
--- /dev/null
+++ b/domains/internet-finance/memecoin-governance-is-ideal-futarchy-use-case-because-single-objective-function-eliminates-long-term-tradeoff-ambiguity.md
@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
+---
+type: claim
+domain: internet-finance
+description: "Memecoin holders have purely price-maximizing preferences making futarchy's conditional markets unambiguous unlike protocols with multi-stakeholder tradeoffs"
+confidence: experimental
+source: "MetaDAO Futardio proposal, 2024-08-14"
+created: 2026-03-11
+---
+
+# Memecoin governance is ideal futarchy use case because single objective function eliminates long-term tradeoff ambiguity
+
+The Futardio proposal identifies memecoins as "one of the ideal use-cases for futarchy" because "memecoin holders only want the price of the token to increase. There's no question of 'maybe the market knows what's the best short-term action, but not the best long-term action.'"
+
+This addresses a core criticism of futarchy: that conditional markets optimize for measurable short-term outcomes at the expense of unmeasurable long-term value. In most governance contexts (protocols, DAOs, companies), stakeholders have competing preferences—users want low fees, token holders want revenue, developers want sustainability. Futarchy's "vote on values, bet on beliefs" requires consensus on the objective function.
+
+Memecoins eliminate this problem structurally. There is no product, no users to serve, no long-term mission beyond price appreciation. Every stakeholder wants the same thing: number go up. This makes the conditional market's objective function unambiguous—proposals that increase expected token price should pass, those that don't should fail.
+
+The mechanism insight: futarchy works best when the objective function is singular and all participants agree on it. Memecoins are the purest expression of this condition in crypto.
+
+## Evidence
+
+From the proposal:
+- "One of the ideal use-cases for futarchy is memecoin governance. This is because memecoin holders only want the price of the token to increase."
+- "There's no question of 'maybe the market knows what's the best short-term action, but not the best long-term action.'"
+- Proposal structure: "a memecoin launchpad with said bootstrapping mechanism where a portion of every launched memecoin gets allocated to a futarchy DAO"
+
+## Relationship to Existing Claims
+
+This claim complements [[coin price is the fairest objective function for asset futarchy]] by identifying the specific context where coin price is unambiguously correct: assets with no purpose beyond speculation. It also relates to [[redistribution proposals are futarchys hardest unsolved problem because they can increase measured welfare while reducing productive value creation]]—memecoins avoid this problem by having no productive value to begin with.
+
+---
+
+Relevant Notes:
+- [[coin price is the fairest objective function for asset futarchy]]
+- [[redistribution proposals are futarchys hardest unsolved problem because they can increase measured welfare while reducing productive value creation]]
+- MetaDAO
+
+Topics:
+- core/mechanisms/_map
+- domains/internet-finance/_map
\ No newline at end of file