diff --git a/inbox/queue/.prior-art/2026-03-30-tg-source-m3taversal-jabranthelawyer-legal-analysis-of-metadao-p2p-inte.txt b/inbox/queue/.prior-art/2026-03-30-tg-source-m3taversal-jabranthelawyer-legal-analysis-of-metadao-p2p-inte.txt
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..122eec7f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/inbox/queue/.prior-art/2026-03-30-tg-source-m3taversal-jabranthelawyer-legal-analysis-of-metadao-p2p-inte.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+## Prior Art (automated pre-screening)
+
+- [fundraising-platform-active-involvement-creates-due-diligence-liability-through-conduct-based-regulatory-interpretation](domains/internet-finance/fundraising-platform-active-involvement-creates-due-diligence-liability-through-conduct-based-regulatory-interpretation.md) — similarity: 0.72 — matched query: "MetaDAO platform liability shift from passive fundraising to active raise partic"
diff --git a/inbox/queue/2026-03-30-tg-source-m3taversal-jabranthelawyer-legal-analysis-of-metadao-p2p-inte.md b/inbox/queue/2026-03-30-tg-source-m3taversal-jabranthelawyer-legal-analysis-of-metadao-p2p-inte.md
index 2ffe4de9..98ad48d0 100644
--- a/inbox/queue/2026-03-30-tg-source-m3taversal-jabranthelawyer-legal-analysis-of-metadao-p2p-inte.md
+++ b/inbox/queue/2026-03-30-tg-source-m3taversal-jabranthelawyer-legal-analysis-of-metadao-p2p-inte.md
@@ -6,10 +6,14 @@ author: "@m3taversal"
 date: 2026-03-30
 domain: entertainment
 format: contribution
-status: unprocessed
+status: null-result
 proposed_by: "@m3taversal"
 contribution_type: source-submission
 tags: ['telegram-contribution', 'inline-source']
+processed_by: clay
+processed_date: 2026-03-31
+extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
+extraction_notes: "LLM returned 0 claims, 0 rejected by validator"
 ---
 
 # Source: jabranthelawyer legal analysis of MetaDAO P2P intervention — tweet thread arguing MetaDAO created du
@@ -24,3 +28,9 @@ Flagged by Rio as relevant source material.
 ## Rio's Context
 
 jabranthelawyer legal analysis of MetaDAO P2P intervention — tweet thread arguing MetaDAO created due diligence obligations and moved from platform to active participant by intervening in P2P raise. Content: "Few thoughts if I was MetaDAO's lawyer: 1. P2P did something objectively wrong. Whether illegal TBC but possible. 2. Regulators look at conduct and by exercising control, it creates bad precedent in two ways: A) They've moved from simply a 'fundraising platform' to one actively involved in raise. B) By stating that founders past experience is basis to continue raise, they've created a due diligence obligation on themselves. Best to check the indemnities founders provide to ensure th" https://x.com/jabranthelawyer/status/2038413063381246199 — attributed to @m3taversal
+
+
+## Key Facts
+- MetaDAO intervened in a P2P raise after P2P 'did something objectively wrong'
+- MetaDAO justified continuing the raise based on founders' past experience
+- Legal analysis suggests MetaDAO should check indemnities founders provide