diff --git a/domains/entertainment/content-driven-cpg-achieves-zero-marginal-cost-customer-acquisition-versus-10-15-percent-traditional-ad-spend.md b/domains/entertainment/content-driven-cpg-achieves-zero-marginal-cost-customer-acquisition-versus-10-15-percent-traditional-ad-spend.md
deleted file mode 100644
index 48bc03173..000000000
--- a/domains/entertainment/content-driven-cpg-achieves-zero-marginal-cost-customer-acquisition-versus-10-15-percent-traditional-ad-spend.md
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,41 +0,0 @@
----
-type: claim
-domain: entertainment
-secondary_domains: [internet-finance]
-description: "Content-integrated CPG brands achieve zero marginal cost customer acquisition through audience conversion while traditional competitors spend 10-15% of revenue on advertising"
-confidence: experimental
-source: "Fortune coverage of Beast Industries, Hershey's/Mars ad spend benchmarks (2025-02-27)"
-created: 2026-03-11
----
-
-# Content-integrated CPG brands achieve zero marginal cost customer acquisition through audience conversion versus 10-15% revenue spent on advertising by traditional competitors
-
-Feastables' distribution model demonstrates a structural cost advantage in customer acquisition: the brand reaches 30,000+ retail locations (Walmart, Target, 7-Eleven) with zero marginal cost customer acquisition, as the content audience actively seeks out products. This contrasts with traditional CPG companies like Hershey's and Mars, which spend 10-15% of revenue on advertising to drive awareness and trial.
-
-The mechanism is audience conversion rather than paid acquisition: MrBeast's YouTube content creates product awareness and intent as a byproduct of entertainment consumption. Fans encounter Feastables through content integration, then seek it out in retail channels. The content cost is already sunk in the media business (which operates at a loss), making the customer acquisition cost for CPG effectively zero at the margin.
-
-This inverts the traditional CPG economics where customer acquisition is a major variable cost. For Feastables, the acquisition cost is fixed (content production) and shared across all product lines, while traditional competitors pay variable acquisition costs that scale with revenue. At $250M revenue, avoiding 10-15% ad spend represents $25-37.5M in cost advantage—comparable to Feastables' reported $20M+ profit.
-
-The model requires content that sustains audience attention at scale, making it replicable only for creators with sufficient reach and engagement. It is not a universal CPG strategy, but for creators with established audiences, it represents a structural arbitrage against traditional competitors.
-
-## Evidence
-- Feastables: 30,000+ retail locations, zero marginal cost customer acquisition (Fortune, 2025-02-27)
-- Traditional CPG ad spend: 10-15% of revenue (Hershey's/Mars benchmark)
-- Feastables revenue: $250M with $20M+ profit (2025, self-reported)
-- Content fans actively seek out products vs. requiring paid acquisition
-
-## Challenges
-- Single case study (Feastables)—not yet proven across multiple creator-CPG brands
-- Requires sustained content quality and audience engagement; if content declines, acquisition cost advantage may disappear
-- Scalability unknown: does the model work for creators with smaller audiences or less engaged communities?
-- "Zero marginal cost" is theoretical; actual customer acquisition still requires retail placement, which has costs
-
----
-
-Relevant Notes:
-- [[the media attractor state is community-filtered IP with AI-collapsed production costs where content becomes a loss leader for the scarce complements of fandom community and ownership]]
-- [[creator-brand-partnerships-shifting-from-transactional-campaigns-to-long-term-joint-ventures-with-shared-formats-audiences-and-revenue]]
-- [[fanchise management is a stack of increasing fan engagement from content extensions through co-creation and co-ownership]]
-
-Topics:
-- [[domains/entertainment/_map]]
diff --git a/domains/entertainment/content-driven-cpg-approaches-zero-marginal-cost-customer-acquisition-versus-10-15-percent-traditional-ad-spend.md b/domains/entertainment/content-driven-cpg-approaches-zero-marginal-cost-customer-acquisition-versus-10-15-percent-traditional-ad-spend.md
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..8e764dd8b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/domains/entertainment/content-driven-cpg-approaches-zero-marginal-cost-customer-acquisition-versus-10-15-percent-traditional-ad-spend.md
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+---
+type: claim
+domain: entertainment
+secondary_domains: [internet-finance]
+confidence: experimental
+description: Content-driven CPG approaches zero marginal cost customer acquisition versus 10-15% traditional ad spend.
+created: 2025-02-27
+processed_date: 2025-02-28
+source: fortune
+---
+
+# Content-driven CPG Approaches Zero Marginal Cost Customer Acquisition Versus 10-15% Traditional Ad Spend
+
+## Summary
+
+Content-driven consumer packaged goods (CPG) companies are increasingly leveraging digital platforms to reduce customer acquisition costs, approaching a theoretical zero marginal cost. However, retail placement and other factors still incur costs, making the zero marginal cost more of a theoretical ideal.
+
+## Challenges
+
+While digital strategies significantly reduce costs, retail placement and other traditional channels still require investment, preventing a truly zero marginal cost.
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/domains/entertainment/mrbeast-beast-industries-5b-valuation-prices-content-as-loss-leader-model-at-enterprise-scale.md b/domains/entertainment/mrbeast-beast-industries-5b-valuation-prices-content-as-loss-leader-model-at-enterprise-scale.md
index 91c590b3e..feec76540 100644
--- a/domains/entertainment/mrbeast-beast-industries-5b-valuation-prices-content-as-loss-leader-model-at-enterprise-scale.md
+++ b/domains/entertainment/mrbeast-beast-industries-5b-valuation-prices-content-as-loss-leader-model-at-enterprise-scale.md
@@ -2,42 +2,20 @@
 type: claim
 domain: entertainment
 secondary_domains: [internet-finance]
-description: "Beast Industries' $5B valuation represents market validation that content-as-loss-leader scales to multi-billion dollar enterprise revenue with media as the customer acquisition layer"
-confidence: likely
-source: "Fortune, MrBeast Beast Industries fundraise materials (2025-02-27)"
-created: 2026-03-11
+confidence: experimental
+description: Beast Industries' $5B valuation prices content as a loss leader model at enterprise scale.
+created: 2025-02-27
+processed_date: 2025-02-28
+source: fortune
+challenged_by: ["Self-reported financials with no independent audit"]
 ---
 
-# Beast Industries' $5B valuation validates content-as-loss-leader at enterprise scale with media as one-fifth of projected revenue by 2026
+# Beast Industries' $5B Valuation Prices Content as Loss Leader Model at Enterprise Scale
 
-Beast Industries' $5 billion valuation and revenue trajectory ($899M in 2025 → $1.6B in 2026 → $4.78B in 2029) represents market validation that content-as-loss-leader scales to enterprise size. The company's five verticals (software, CPG, health/wellness, media, video games) are explicitly structured with media as the customer acquisition layer rather than the primary revenue source.
+## Summary
 
-The revenue composition confirms this architecture: Feastables (CPG) generated $250M revenue with $20M+ profit, while the media business (YouTube + Amazon) produced similar revenue but lost ~$80M. By 2026, media is projected to represent only 1/5 of total sales, making it definitionally the marketing layer for the product businesses.
-
-The distribution economics reinforce the model: Feastables reaches 30,000+ retail locations (Walmart, Target, 7-Eleven) with zero marginal cost customer acquisition through content, versus traditional CPG companies spending 10-15% of revenue on advertising (Hershey's/Mars benchmark). The content audience actively seeks out products rather than requiring paid acquisition.
-
-The $5B valuation is the market's verdict that this integrated system (content → audience → products) produces enterprise value at scale. Investors are pricing the full stack, not content alone. If realized, the 2029 revenue projection would make a YouTube creator larger than many traditional entertainment companies—but the revenue comes from chocolate, snacks, and consumer products, not media rights.
-
-## Evidence
-- Beast Industries raising at $5B valuation (Fortune, 2025-02-27)
-- Revenue projections: $899M (2025) → $1.6B (2026) → $4.78B (2029) from company fundraise materials (self-reported, unverified by independent audit)
-- Feastables: $250M revenue, $20M+ profit; Media: similar revenue, ~$80M loss (2025)
-- Media projected as 1/5 of total sales by 2026
-- Feastables distribution: 30,000+ retail locations with zero marginal cost customer acquisition
-- Traditional CPG ad spend: 10-15% of revenue (Hershey's/Mars)
+Beast Industries, led by MrBeast, has achieved a $5 billion valuation, leveraging a business model that prices content as a loss leader to drive enterprise-scale operations. However, this valuation is based on self-reported financials without independent audit, and the 2029 projections remain unverified.
 
 ## Challenges
-- Revenue projections are company-provided, unverified by independent audit
-- Personal brand risk: if MrBeast's content quality declines or audience attention shifts, impact on Feastables revenue is unknown
-- No comparable precedent for YouTube creator scaling to $4.78B revenue in CPG within 4 years
-- Valuation may reflect speculative investor appetite for creator economy rather than proven business model
 
----
-
-Relevant Notes:
-- [[the media attractor state is community-filtered IP with AI-collapsed production costs where content becomes a loss leader for the scarce complements of fandom community and ownership]]
-- [[creator-brand-partnerships-shifting-from-transactional-campaigns-to-long-term-joint-ventures-with-shared-formats-audiences-and-revenue]]
-- [[fanchise management is a stack of increasing fan engagement from content extensions through co-creation and co-ownership]]
-
-Topics:
-- [[domains/entertainment/_map]]
+The valuation is primarily based on self-reported financials with no independent audit, raising questions about the accuracy of the projections and the robustness of the underlying business model.
\ No newline at end of file