teleo/teleo-codex
8
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 22 Pull requests 116 Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions 1

theseus: extract from 2026-02-00-yamamoto-full-formal-arrow-impossibility.md

Browse source 
- Source: inbox/archive/2026-02-00-yamamoto-full-formal-arrow-impossibility.md
- Domain: ai-alignment
- Extracted by: headless extraction cron (worker 2)

Pentagon-Agent: Theseus <HEADLESS>
This commit is contained in:
Teleo Agents 2026-03-12 06:57:19 +00:00
parent ba4ac4a73e
commit 1eaa1a2753
2 changed files with 18 additions and 1 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

6
domains/ai-alignment/safe AI development requires building alignment mechanisms before scaling capability.md
View file

@ -21,6 +21,12 @@ This phased approach is also a practical response to the observation that since
Anthropic's RSP rollback demonstrates the opposite pattern in practice: the company scaled capability while weakening its pre-commitment to adequate safety measures. The original RSP required guaranteeing safety measures were adequate *before* training new systems. The rollback removes this forcing function, allowing capability development to proceed with safety work repositioned as aspirational ('we hope to create a forcing function') rather than mandatory. This provides empirical evidence that even safety-focused organizations prioritize capability scaling over alignment-first development when competitive pressure intensifies, suggesting the claim may be normatively correct but descriptively violated by actual frontier labs under market conditions.
### Additional Evidence (extend)
*Source: [[2026-02-00-yamamoto-full-formal-arrow-impossibility]] | Added: 2026-03-12 | Extractor: anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5*
Arrow's impossibility theorem now has a full formal representation using proof calculus in formal logic (Yamamoto, PLOS One, February 2026). This provides machine-checkable verification of the theorem's validity, strengthening the mathematical foundation underlying claims that universal alignment is impossible. The formal proof reveals the global structure of the social welfare function central to the theorem through meticulous derivation, complementing existing computer-aided proofs (AAAI 2008) and simplified proofs via Condorcet's paradox.
---
Relevant Notes:

13
inbox/archive/2026-02-00-yamamoto-full-formal-arrow-impossibility.md
View file

@ -7,9 +7,14 @@ date: 2026-02-01
domain: ai-alignment
secondary_domains: [critical-systems]
format: paper
status: unprocessed
status: enrichment
priority: medium
tags: [arrows-theorem, formal-proof, proof-calculus, social-choice]
processed_by: theseus
processed_date: 2026-03-11
enrichments_applied: ["safe AI development requires building alignment mechanisms before scaling capability.md"]
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
extraction_notes: "Pure formal verification paper with no direct AI alignment discussion. Enriches existing Arrow's impossibility claim by providing machine-checkable proof foundation. No new claims warranted—the contribution is methodological (formal verification) rather than conceptual."
---
## Content
@ -30,3 +35,9 @@ Key contribution: meticulous derivation revealing the global structure of the so
PRIMARY CONNECTION: universal alignment is mathematically impossible because Arrows impossibility theorem applies to aggregating diverse human preferences into a single coherent objective
WHY ARCHIVED: Provides formal verification foundation for our Arrow's impossibility claim
EXTRACTION HINT: Likely enrichment to existing claim rather than standalone — add as evidence that Arrow's theorem is now formally machine-verifiable
## Key Facts
- Arrow's impossibility theorem received full formal representation using proof calculus (Yamamoto, PLOS One, February 2026)
- Formal proof complements existing computer-aided proofs from AAAI 2008 and simplified proofs via Condorcet's paradox
- Published in PLOS One (open-access, peer-reviewed journal)