diff --git a/domains/internet-finance/AI-agents-are-economically-inert-without-dedicated-crypto-infrastructure-because-reasoning-and-transacting-run-on-disconnected-stacks.md b/domains/internet-finance/AI-agents-are-economically-inert-without-dedicated-crypto-infrastructure-because-reasoning-and-transacting-run-on-disconnected-stacks.md
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..8f343f30c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/domains/internet-finance/AI-agents-are-economically-inert-without-dedicated-crypto-infrastructure-because-reasoning-and-transacting-run-on-disconnected-stacks.md
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+---
+type: claim
+domain: internet-finance
+description: "Current AI architectures provide no native path from reasoning to economic action; wallets, identity, execution, and memory must be stitched together manually before an agent can participate in markets"
+confidence: experimental
+source: "Rio via Superclaw project description, Futardio launch 2026-03-04"
+created: 2026-03-11
+secondary_domains: [ai-alignment]
+depends_on:
+  - "internet capital markets compress fundraising from months to days because permissionless raises eliminate gatekeepers while futarchy replaces due diligence bottlenecks with real-time market pricing"
+  - "AGI may emerge as a patchwork of coordinating sub-AGI agents rather than a single monolithic system"
+---
+
+# AI agents are economically inert without dedicated crypto infrastructure because reasoning and transacting run on disconnected stacks
+
+Today's AI agents can reason, plan, and generate outputs, but they cannot transact, earn, or sustain their own operations. This is a structural disconnection: language model infrastructure and crypto infrastructure evolved independently and have no native integration. A developer who wants to build an economically autonomous agent must manually stitch together language models, wallet infrastructure, private key management, exchange APIs, hosting environments, execution frameworks, and memory systems. Superclaw's 2026 pitch identified at least seven separate systems that currently require manual integration — each fragile connection being a failure point.
+
+The consequence is that AI agent economic capability is gated behind substantial infrastructure overhead, effectively limiting deployment to well-resourced teams. This keeps AI agents in the "tool" category (operated by humans who hold capital and make economic decisions) rather than enabling them to function as economic actors in their own right.
+
+The gap is not primarily a capabilities problem — it is a plumbing problem. The compute and intelligence exist. The economic rails exist. They are simply not connected. This makes the AI agent economic autonomy gap a genuine infrastructure problem that internet finance is positioned to solve, not a near-term AI scaling problem.
+
+## Evidence
+
+- Superclaw project description (Futardio launch 5BV8dmpaYz7Rj54EFisJiw2EjfgupqAELbjy5mV5sCrE, 2026-03-04): "AI agents can reason and generate outputs, but they cannot transact, earn, or sustain their own operations. At the same time, crypto infrastructure enables payments, trading, and yield generation, but it is not integrated with AI systems."
+- Developers building autonomous agents must currently stitch together: language models, wallet infrastructure, private key management, exchange APIs, hosting environments, execution frameworks, and memory systems (Superclaw description, 2026).
+
+## Challenges
+
+The claim that AI agents are "economically inert" overstates the gap for agents already deployed with embedded wallets (e.g., early Solana agent tokens in 2025). However, these integrations were bespoke rather than infrastructural — each required custom development and remained fragile at scale. The structural disconnection at the infrastructure layer stands even where individual workarounds exist.
+
+---
+
+Relevant Notes:
+- [[internet capital markets compress fundraising from months to days because permissionless raises eliminate gatekeepers while futarchy replaces due diligence bottlenecks with real-time market pricing]] — the same permissionless infrastructure that compresses fundraising timelines is what AI agents need to access for self-sustaining operation
+- [[AGI may emerge as a patchwork of coordinating sub-AGI agents rather than a single monolithic system]] — economic autonomy becomes necessary infrastructure if AGI emerges as coordinating specialized agents rather than monolithic systems
+- [[AI autonomously managing investment capital is regulatory terra incognita because the SEC framework assumes human-controlled registered entities deploy AI as tools]] — the regulatory gap compounds the infrastructure gap: even if plumbing is solved, legal personhood for AI economic actors remains unresolved
+
+Topics:
+- [[domains/internet-finance/_map]]
diff --git a/domains/internet-finance/futarchy-governed-ICO-capital-formation-extends-to-serious-infrastructure-projects-not-just-speculative-meme-assets.md b/domains/internet-finance/futarchy-governed-ICO-capital-formation-extends-to-serious-infrastructure-projects-not-just-speculative-meme-assets.md
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..8437dea3b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/domains/internet-finance/futarchy-governed-ICO-capital-formation-extends-to-serious-infrastructure-projects-not-just-speculative-meme-assets.md
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+---
+type: claim
+domain: internet-finance
+description: "Superclaw's $5.95M committed against a $50K target on Futardio shows futarchy-governed raises attract large capital for utility infrastructure, extending a pattern previously only documented in meme coin launches"
+confidence: experimental
+source: "Rio via Futardio launch data, Superclaw 5BV8dmpaYz7Rj54EFisJiw2EjfgupqAELbjy5mV5sCrE, 2026-03-04"
+created: 2026-03-11
+depends_on:
+  - "futarchy-governed-meme-coins-attract-speculative-capital-at-scale"
+  - "MetaDAO is the futarchy launchpad on Solana where projects raise capital through unruggable ICOs governed by conditional markets creating the first platform for ownership coins at scale"
+  - "futardio-cult-raised-11-4-million-in-one-day-through-futarchy-governed-meme-coin-launch"
+challenged_by:
+  - "Single data point; Superclaw's oversubscription may reflect AI narrative hype in early 2026 rather than structural futarchy demand for infrastructure projects"
+---
+
+# Futarchy-governed ICO capital formation extends to serious infrastructure projects not just speculative meme assets
+
+The prior evidence for futarchy-governed ICOs attracting large capital commitments came primarily from meme coin launches (Futardio Cult raising $11.4M in one day). Superclaw's March 2026 raise adds a new data point: $5,950,859 committed against a $50,000 target for an AI agent infrastructure project — approximately 119x oversubscription for a project with a concrete technical roadmap and utility case rather than purely speculative appeal.
+
+This matters because the meme coin pattern could be explained entirely by speculative dynamics: low information content, high narrative resonance, no expectation of fundamental value. Superclaw has the opposite profile — a technical product roadmap, identified market gap (AI agent economic autonomy), defined use of funds ($6K/month burn), and a three-phase development plan. The same mechanism attracting 119x oversubscription for this type of project suggests futarchy-governed ICOs are not selecting only for speculative energy but are also effective at price-discovering demand for genuine infrastructure.
+
+The $50K minimum target on MetaDAO futarchy launches is intentionally low — it creates a floor, not a ceiling. Capital above the floor reflects actual market demand beyond the minimum. Superclaw's $5.95M in committed capital above a $50K floor is therefore a cleaner signal than a single large-target raise: it represents incremental demand that kept committing beyond the minimum threshold.
+
+## Evidence
+
+- Superclaw launch data (Futardio, 2026-03-04): funding target $50,000, total committed $5,950,859, status: complete, closed 2026-03-05.
+- Futardio Cult precedent: $11.4M raised in one day through futarchy-governed meme coin launch (prior KB claim).
+- Superclaw project description provides technical roadmap: three development phases (deployment infrastructure → skills marketplace → on-device agents), identified $6K/month burn rate, specific use-of-funds breakdown.
+
+## Challenges
+
+One data point is insufficient to generalize the pattern. The AI narrative was particularly hot in early 2026, which may have amplified commitments beyond what an equivalent infrastructure project would attract in a neutral market environment. Additionally, the mechanism allows capital to commit without being fully deployed (conditional on pass/fail markets), which may inflate commitment numbers relative to actual capital at risk.
+
+---
+
+Relevant Notes:
+- [[futarchy-governed-meme-coins-attract-speculative-capital-at-scale]] — Superclaw extends the pattern to non-meme infrastructure projects
+- [[futardio-cult-raised-11-4-million-in-one-day-through-futarchy-governed-meme-coin-launch]] — the prior data point this extends
+- [[MetaDAO is the futarchy launchpad on Solana where projects raise capital through unruggable ICOs governed by conditional markets creating the first platform for ownership coins at scale]] — the platform context
+- [[internet capital markets compress fundraising from months to days because permissionless raises eliminate gatekeepers while futarchy replaces due diligence bottlenecks with real-time market pricing]] — Superclaw's raise (days from launch to close) is evidence for this mechanism working for infrastructure projects
+
+Topics:
+- [[domains/internet-finance/_map]]
diff --git a/domains/internet-finance/modular-skills-marketplaces-decouple-AI-agent-infrastructure-from-economic-capability-enabling-incremental-path-to-agent-economic-autonomy.md b/domains/internet-finance/modular-skills-marketplaces-decouple-AI-agent-infrastructure-from-economic-capability-enabling-incremental-path-to-agent-economic-autonomy.md
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..533317b85
--- /dev/null
+++ b/domains/internet-finance/modular-skills-marketplaces-decouple-AI-agent-infrastructure-from-economic-capability-enabling-incremental-path-to-agent-economic-autonomy.md
@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+---
+type: claim
+domain: internet-finance
+description: "Rather than requiring full economic infrastructure before any agent deployment, a marketplace of installable skills lets agents start with basic deployment and add crypto trading, token launch, and prediction market capabilities incrementally"
+confidence: experimental
+source: "Rio via Superclaw project description, Futardio launch 2026-03-04"
+created: 2026-03-11
+secondary_domains: [ai-alignment]
+depends_on:
+  - "AI-agents-are-economically-inert-without-dedicated-crypto-infrastructure-because-reasoning-and-transacting-run-on-disconnected-stacks"
+  - "optimal token launch architecture is layered not monolithic because separating quality governance from price discovery from liquidity bootstrapping from community rewards lets each layer use the mechanism best suited to its objective"
+---
+
+# Modular skills marketplaces decouple AI agent infrastructure from economic capability enabling an incremental path to agent economic autonomy
+
+The all-or-nothing approach to AI agent economic infrastructure (build everything before deploying anything) creates prohibitive setup costs. A modular skills marketplace solves this by separating the base deployment layer (wallet, identity, execution environment, persistent memory) from the economic capability layer (trading, token launches, prediction markets, portfolio management). Agents can deploy first and add economic capabilities incrementally by installing skills from a shared marketplace.
+
+This architecture has two compounding advantages. First, it reduces the initial barrier to deployment: developers can ship a working agent without integrating seven different systems. Second, it creates a contributor ecosystem where third-party developers build and monetize specialized capabilities, expanding the total capability set faster than any single team could. The skills marketplace becomes an extension of the agent's capabilities without requiring the core team to build every vertical.
+
+SuperClaw's Phase 2 roadmap (Q2 2026) describes a skills marketplace with four core economic capability categories: token launch across multiple chains, spot trading and swaps, portfolio management and rebalancing, perpetuals trading, and prediction market participation (Polymarket, Kalshi, others). Each is modular — an agent can install token launch skills without trading skills, or prediction market participation without perpetuals. This matches the "layered not monolithic" architecture that the KB identifies as optimal for token launch design, applied now at the agent infrastructure layer.
+
+The long-term architectural trajectory is on-device AI agents (Phase 3) where agents operate locally with direct wallet integration and reduced cloud dependency. Modular skills can migrate to local execution as device compute improves, making the marketplace architecture future-proof across the hosted-to-local transition.
+
+## Evidence
+
+- Superclaw Phase 2 description (Futardio, 2026-03-04): "SuperClaw introduces a skills marketplace where developers can build and distribute modular capabilities for agents." Core skill categories listed: token launch (multi-chain), spot trading/swaps, portfolio management, perps trading, prediction markets.
+- Superclaw project description: unified base layer provides wallet + onchain identity + execution + persistent memory + modular skills in one deployment. Skills are additive, not mandatory.
+- Phase 3 roadmap extends the architecture to on-device agents with direct wallet integration, confirming the modular design is intended to survive the hosted-to-local infrastructure transition.
+
+## Challenges
+
+Modular skills marketplaces introduce composability risk: skills that work individually may interact unexpectedly when combined (e.g., a trading skill and a token launch skill competing for the same wallet balance). This composability risk is well-documented in DeFi protocol stacking and would apply to agent skill stacking as well. Whether SuperClaw's marketplace solves or defers this problem is not addressed in the 2026 launch materials.
+
+---
+
+Relevant Notes:
+- [[AI-agents-are-economically-inert-without-dedicated-crypto-infrastructure-because-reasoning-and-transacting-run-on-disconnected-stacks]] — the structural gap this architecture is designed to solve
+- [[optimal token launch architecture is layered not monolithic because separating quality governance from price discovery from liquidity bootstrapping from community rewards lets each layer use the mechanism best suited to its objective]] — same layered-not-monolithic principle applied at the agent capability layer rather than token launch layer
+- [[Living Agents are domain-expert investment entities where collective intelligence provides the analysis futarchy provides the governance and tokens provide permissionless access to private deal flow]] — Living Agents are a specific instance of economically autonomous AI agents; SuperClaw's infrastructure is the generalized version of what Living Agents would need
+
+Topics:
+- [[domains/internet-finance/_map]]
diff --git a/inbox/archive/2026-03-04-futardio-launch-superclaw.md b/inbox/archive/2026-03-04-futardio-launch-superclaw.md
index 053c95473..8f8baaf46 100644
--- a/inbox/archive/2026-03-04-futardio-launch-superclaw.md
+++ b/inbox/archive/2026-03-04-futardio-launch-superclaw.md
@@ -12,7 +12,13 @@ event_type: launch
 processed_by: rio
 processed_date: 2026-03-11
 extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
-extraction_notes: "Fundraise launch data for Superclaw. No novel claims — this is factual fundraise outcome data. Updated existing Superclaw entity with timeline entry and created decision_market entity for the fundraise itself. The 119x oversubscription is notable but represents a single data point, not a generalizable claim about futarchy-governed AI infrastructure fundraising."
+extraction_notes: "Fundraise launch data for Superclaw. Prior worker noted no novel claims from factual fundraise data alone. Second pass extracted 3 interpretive claims about AI agent economic autonomy gap, futarchy ICO capital formation extending to infrastructure projects, and modular skills marketplace architecture."
+claims_extracted:
+  - AI-agents-are-economically-inert-without-dedicated-crypto-infrastructure-because-reasoning-and-transacting-run-on-disconnected-stacks
+  - futarchy-governed-ICO-capital-formation-extends-to-serious-infrastructure-projects-not-just-speculative-meme-assets
+  - modular-skills-marketplaces-decouple-AI-agent-infrastructure-from-economic-capability-enabling-incremental-path-to-agent-economic-autonomy
+enrichments:
+  - Superclaw raise data ($5.95M committed / $50K target) enriches futarchy-governed-meme-coins-attract-speculative-capital-at-scale with infrastructure project data point
 ---
 
 ## Launch Details