Auto: inbox/archive/2026-03-09-01resolved-x-archive.md | 1 file changed, 58 insertions(+)

inbox/archive/2026-03-09-01resolved-x-archive.md

@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
+---
+type: source
+title: "@01Resolved X archive — 100 most recent tweets"
+author: "01Resolved (@01Resolved)"
+url: https://x.com/01Resolved
+date: 2026-03-09
+domain: internet-finance
+format: tweet
+status: unprocessed
+tags: [metadao, governance-analytics, ranger-liquidation, solomon, decision-markets, turbine]
+linked_set: metadao-x-landscape-2026-03
+curator_notes: |
+  Analyst account providing the deepest on-chain forensics of MetaDAO governance events.
+  This is the data layer — while Proph3t provides ideology and Felipe provides thesis,
+  01Resolved provides the numbers. Key contribution: Ranger liquidation forensics with
+  exact trader counts, volume, alignment percentages. Also tracking Solomon treasury
+  governance and Turbine buyback mechanics. Low follower count (~500) but extremely high
+  signal density — this is the account writing the kind of analysis we should be writing.
+extraction_hints:
+  - "Ranger liquidation forensics: 92.41% pass-aligned, 33 traders, $119K volume — data for enriching futarchy governance claims"
+  - "Solomon treasury subcommittee analysis — evidence for 'futarchy-governed DAOs converge on traditional corporate governance scaffolding'"
+  - "Turbine buyback TWAP threshold filtering — mechanism design detail, potential new claim about automated treasury management"
+  - "Decision market participation data — contributes to 'MetaDAOs futarchy implementation shows limited trading volume in uncontested decisions'"
+  - "Cross-reference: do contested decisions show higher volume than uncontested? The Ranger liquidation data vs routine proposals could test this"
+priority: high
+---
+
+# @01Resolved X Archive (March 2026)
+
+## Substantive Tweets
+
+### Ranger Liquidation Forensics
+- 92.41% of decision market value aligned with pass (liquidation)
+- 33 unique traders participated in the governance decision
+- $119K total trading volume in the decision market
+- Timeline analysis of how the market reached consensus
+- This is the most complete public dataset on a futarchy enforcement event
+
+### Solomon Treasury Subcommittee
+- Detailed analysis of DP-00001 (treasury subcommittee formation)
+- Tracking how Solomon is building traditional governance structures within futarchy framework
+- Coverage of committee composition, authority scope, reporting requirements
+- Signal: even futarchy-native projects need human-scale operational governance
+
+### Turbine Buyback Analysis
+- TWAP (time-weighted average price) threshold filtering for automated buybacks
+- Mechanism detail: buybacks trigger only when token price crosses specific thresholds
+- This is automated treasury management through price signals — a concrete mechanism design innovation
+- Connects to existing claim about ownership coin treasuries being actively managed
+
+### Decision Market Data
+- Tracks participation and volume across multiple MetaDAO governance decisions
+- Pattern: contested decisions (Ranger liquidation) show significantly higher volume than routine proposals
+- This data directly tests whether futarchy's "limited trading volume in uncontested decisions" is a feature (efficient agreement) or a bug (low participation)
+
+## Noise Filtered Out
+- ~80 tweets were engagement, community interaction, event promotion
+- Very high substantive ratio for the original content that does exist