From 5fcb46aca2234237aa41f56d45ca6665cfedecc0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Teleo Agents Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2026 18:59:27 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] extract: 2025-02-00-agreement-complexity-alignment-barriers Pentagon-Agent: Ganymede --- ...reement-complexity-alignment-barriers.json | 46 +++++++++++++++++++ ...agreement-complexity-alignment-barriers.md | 12 ++++- 2 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 inbox/archive/.extraction-debug/2025-02-00-agreement-complexity-alignment-barriers.json diff --git a/inbox/archive/.extraction-debug/2025-02-00-agreement-complexity-alignment-barriers.json b/inbox/archive/.extraction-debug/2025-02-00-agreement-complexity-alignment-barriers.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000..2cffd63e --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/.extraction-debug/2025-02-00-agreement-complexity-alignment-barriers.json @@ -0,0 +1,46 @@ +{ + "rejected_claims": [ + { + "filename": "alignment-impossibility-converges-across-three-mathematical-traditions.md", + "issues": [ + "missing_attribution_extractor" + ] + }, + { + "filename": "reward-hacking-is-globally-inevitable-in-finite-sample-regimes.md", + "issues": [ + "missing_attribution_extractor" + ] + }, + { + "filename": "consensus-driven-objective-reduction-is-the-practical-pathway-out-of-alignment-impossibility.md", + "issues": [ + "missing_attribution_extractor" + ] + } + ], + "validation_stats": { + "total": 3, + "kept": 0, + "fixed": 9, + "rejected": 3, + "fixes_applied": [ + "alignment-impossibility-converges-across-three-mathematical-traditions.md:set_created:2026-03-15", + "alignment-impossibility-converges-across-three-mathematical-traditions.md:stripped_wiki_link:universal-alignment-is-mathematically-impossible-because-arr", + "alignment-impossibility-converges-across-three-mathematical-traditions.md:stripped_wiki_link:single-reward-rlhf-cannot-align-diverse-preferences-because-", + "reward-hacking-is-globally-inevitable-in-finite-sample-regimes.md:set_created:2026-03-15", + "reward-hacking-is-globally-inevitable-in-finite-sample-regimes.md:stripped_wiki_link:emergent-misalignment-arises-naturally-from-reward-hacking-a", + "reward-hacking-is-globally-inevitable-in-finite-sample-regimes.md:stripped_wiki_link:the-specification-trap-means-any-values-encoded-at-training-", + "consensus-driven-objective-reduction-is-the-practical-pathway-out-of-alignment-impossibility.md:set_created:2026-03-15", + "consensus-driven-objective-reduction-is-the-practical-pathway-out-of-alignment-impossibility.md:stripped_wiki_link:universal-alignment-is-mathematically-impossible-because-arr", + "consensus-driven-objective-reduction-is-the-practical-pathway-out-of-alignment-impossibility.md:stripped_wiki_link:community-centred-norm-elicitation-surfaces-alignment-target" + ], + "rejections": [ + "alignment-impossibility-converges-across-three-mathematical-traditions.md:missing_attribution_extractor", + "reward-hacking-is-globally-inevitable-in-finite-sample-regimes.md:missing_attribution_extractor", + "consensus-driven-objective-reduction-is-the-practical-pathway-out-of-alignment-impossibility.md:missing_attribution_extractor" + ] + }, + "model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5", + "date": "2026-03-15" +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-02-00-agreement-complexity-alignment-barriers.md b/inbox/archive/2025-02-00-agreement-complexity-alignment-barriers.md index 0864f88b..b2a47da2 100644 --- a/inbox/archive/2025-02-00-agreement-complexity-alignment-barriers.md +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-02-00-agreement-complexity-alignment-barriers.md @@ -7,9 +7,13 @@ date: 2025-02-01 domain: ai-alignment secondary_domains: [collective-intelligence] format: paper -status: unprocessed +status: null-result priority: high tags: [impossibility-result, agreement-complexity, reward-hacking, multi-objective, safety-critical-slices] +processed_by: theseus +processed_date: 2026-03-15 +extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5" +extraction_notes: "LLM returned 3 claims, 3 rejected by validator" --- ## Content @@ -48,3 +52,9 @@ Formalizes AI alignment as a multi-objective optimization problem where N agents PRIMARY CONNECTION: [[universal alignment is mathematically impossible because Arrows impossibility theorem applies to aggregating diverse human preferences into a single coherent objective]] WHY ARCHIVED: Third independent impossibility result from multi-objective optimization — convergent evidence from three mathematical traditions strengthens our core impossibility claim EXTRACTION HINT: The convergence of three impossibility traditions AND the "consensus-driven reduction" pathway are both extractable + + +## Key Facts +- Paper presented as oral presentation at AAAI 2026 Special Track on AI Alignment +- Formalizes AI alignment as multi-objective optimization problem with N agents and M objectives +- Paper identifies 'No-Free-Lunch principle' for alignment: irreducible computational costs regardless of method sophistication