diff --git a/domains/internet-finance/futarchy-incentive-programs-use-multisig-execution-groups-as-discretionary-override.md b/domains/internet-finance/futarchy-incentive-programs-use-multisig-execution-groups-as-discretionary-override.md
index 0014ce9d..a4301bd3 100644
--- a/domains/internet-finance/futarchy-incentive-programs-use-multisig-execution-groups-as-discretionary-override.md
+++ b/domains/internet-finance/futarchy-incentive-programs-use-multisig-execution-groups-as-discretionary-override.md
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ The Drift proposal establishes a 2/3 multisig execution group (metaprophet, Suma
 
 
 ### Additional Evidence (confirm)
-*Source: [[2024-12-19-futardio-proposal-allocate-50000-drift-to-fund-the-drift-ai-agent-request-for]] | Added: 2026-03-16*
+*Source: 2024-12-19-futardio-proposal-allocate-50000-drift-to-fund-the-drift-ai-agent-request-for | Added: 2026-03-16*
 
 The Drift proposal explicitly states 'All grant decisions are at the discretion of the decision council and any such decisions made by the decision council are final.' This creates a hybrid structure where futarchy approves the program budget but a committee controls individual allocations, demonstrating the pattern of discretionary override for operational decisions.