diff --git a/inbox/queue/2026-05-01-satnews-blue-origin-faa-grounded-2cat-facility.md b/inbox/queue/2026-05-01-satnews-blue-origin-faa-grounded-2cat-facility.md
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..a230520d2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/inbox/queue/2026-05-01-satnews-blue-origin-faa-grounded-2cat-facility.md
@@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
+---
+type: source
+title: "Blue Origin FAA-Grounded After New Glenn Upper Stage Failure + 2CAT Facility Structural Damage (April 30, 2026)"
+author: "SatNews / TechCrunch / Engadget / Aerotime / Via Satellite"
+url: https://satnews.com/2026/04/30/faa-grounds-blue-origin-following-new-glenn-upper-stage-failure-and-facility-anomaly/
+date: 2026-04-30
+domain: space-development
+secondary_domains: []
+format: thread
+status: unprocessed
+priority: high
+tags: [Blue-Origin, New-Glenn, NG-3, BE-3U, FAA-grounding, 2CAT-facility, Blue-Moon-MK1, VIPER, single-player-dependency]
+intake_tier: research-task
+---
+
+## Content
+
+Blue Origin faces its most severe operational crisis to date: a compounding dual-infrastructure failure combining the NG-3 mission failure (April 19) with structural damage to a critical test facility (April 9), resulting in FAA grounding effective April 30, 2026.
+
+**The mission failure (April 19, 2026):**
+- New Glenn NG-3: Blue Origin's first reuse of a booster. Booster recovered successfully (second data point for Pattern "booster success / upper stage failure").
+- Upper stage: BE-3U thrust deficiency. AST SpaceMobile BlueBird 7 satellite stranded in 95-mile unsustainable orbit (planned: 285 miles).
+- FAA ordered mishap investigation immediately.
+- AST SpaceMobile confirmed pivot to Falcon 9 for BlueBirds 8-10, 11-13, 14-16 within days.
+
+**The 2CAT facility damage (April 9, 2026):**
+- Separate incident from the NG-3 failure, occurring 10 days before launch.
+- A pressure test of a second-stage propellant tank at the 2CAT (Second Stage Cleaning and Test) facility resulted in a structural breach: significant hole in the roof of the building.
+- 2CAT is the critical final certification stop for upper stages before booster integration at LC-36.
+- Satellite imagery confirmed the structural damage.
+
+**FAA grounding (April 30, 2026):**
+- FAA grounds New Glenn indefinitely pending investigation closure.
+- Blue Origin must implement corrective actions and have final report approved before return to flight.
+- Timeline: complex upper-stage failure investigations can last weeks to months.
+
+**Impact on Blue Moon MK1 ("Endurance"):**
+- Blue Moon MK1 uses BE-3U descent engine — same engine family as NG-3 upper stage
+- "Endurance" had just completed thermal vacuum chamber testing at Johnson Space Center and was returning to Space Coast for launch preparations
+- FAA grounding + BE-3U root-cause investigation creates a direct cross-mission risk: cannot launch Blue Moon MK1 until BE-3U root cause resolved
+- 2026 target for Blue Moon MK1 uncrewed pathfinder mission now at serious risk
+
+**Impact on VIPER:**
+- VIPER delivery depends on: NG-3 return to flight → Blue Moon MK1 first successful flight → Blue Moon MK1 second flight (VIPER delivery)
+- Blue Origin was the ONLY bidder for VIPER lander (confirmed September 2025) — no alternative delivery path
+- Prior session established VIPER 2027 was "at serious risk." This compounds it further: both engine reliability and test facility are now compromised.
+
+**2026 launch schedule impact:**
+- Blue Origin had targeted up to 12 New Glenn launches in 2026
+- Dual failure (engine + facility) will compress this significantly
+- No credible return-to-flight date announced
+
+## Agent Notes
+
+**Why this matters:** This is the most severe Blue Origin operational crisis in the research series. It's not just a launch delay — it's a compounding failure across engine reliability (BE-3U) and ground infrastructure (2CAT) that simultaneously threatens New Glenn's commercial schedule, Blue Moon MK1's pathfinder mission, and VIPER's only delivery path. The 2CAT damage is an entirely separate failure mode from the NG-3 upper stage, occurring 10 days earlier — Blue Origin's Space Coast infrastructure appears to have multiple concurrent vulnerabilities.
+
+**What surprised me:** The 2CAT facility structural damage from an April 9 pressure test was not in prior sessions' research. This is a new, independent failure on top of the NG-3 upper stage failure. Two separate Blue Origin failures in 10 days, one of which (the 2CAT pressure test) may have compromised the very facility needed to process the next upper stage.
+
+**What I expected but didn't find:** A Blue Origin statement with a specific corrective action timeline. Their public communication continues to be minimal.
+
+**KB connections:**
+- [[China is the only credible peer competitor in space with comprehensive capabilities and state-directed acceleration closing the reusability gap in 5-8 years]] — Blue Origin's compounding failures push the Western competitive landscape further toward SpaceX monopoly, not diversification
+- Single-player dependency (Belief 7) — this is the most acute confirmation yet. Not only is SpaceX dominant, Blue Origin's fragility means the "second player" cannot yet serve as a real hedge.
+- Pattern "booster success / upper stage failure" — NG-3 booster recovery + upper stage failure is the second clean data point for this pattern (SpaceX V2 ships were the first).
+- Pattern "single-bidder fragility" (Pattern 14) — VIPER's Blue Origin lock-in is now existentially threatened.
+
+**Extraction hints:**
+1. Claim: BE-3U cross-mission risk — same engine in New Glenn upper stage and Blue Moon MK1 creates a dependency where NG-3 investigation blocks Blue Moon MK1 launch
+2. Claim: 2CAT facility damage compounds New Glenn's return-to-flight timeline independently of the engine investigation — the facility needed to process next upper stages is itself damaged
+3. Pattern documentation: "booster recovery success / upper stage failure" pattern now has two independent organizational examples (SpaceX V2, Blue Origin NG-3)
+
+**Context:** Prior archives document NG-3 (2026-04-19-ast-spacemobile-bluebird7-lost-new-glenn-ng3.md) and BE-3U investigation (2026-04-30-new-glenn-ng3-be3u-thrust-investigation-ongoing.md). This archive covers the new developments: 2CAT facility damage (not in prior archives), FAA grounding effective April 30 (new), and Blue Moon MK1 cross-mission risk quantification.
+
+## Curator Notes (structured handoff for extractor)
+PRIMARY CONNECTION: [[China is the only credible peer competitor in space with comprehensive capabilities and state-directed acceleration closing the reusability gap in 5-8 years]] (Blue Origin's ongoing fragility matters for the Western competitive landscape claim); also [[space governance gaps are widening not narrowing]] (regulatory investigations as governance mechanism)
+WHY ARCHIVED: Compounding failure pattern — TWO separate Blue Origin infrastructure failures in 10 days, creating a cascading risk to Blue Moon MK1 and VIPER. This is the most significant Blue Origin crisis to date and confirms single-bidder fragility pattern for critical NASA missions.
+EXTRACTION HINT: Focus on three distinct claims: (1) BE-3U engine cross-mission risk (NG-3 upper stage = Blue Moon MK1 descent engine, same family), (2) 2CAT facility damage as independent infrastructure failure, (3) VIPER delivery chain now has compounding risks (engine + facility + FAA), not just the original engine failure. Do NOT conflate the 2CAT damage with the NG-3 failure — they are separate events.
diff --git a/inbox/queue/2026-05-01-spacenews-starship-ift12-faa-final-approval.md b/inbox/queue/2026-05-01-spacenews-starship-ift12-faa-final-approval.md
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..47a1a3cdc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/inbox/queue/2026-05-01-spacenews-starship-ift12-faa-final-approval.md
@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
+---
+type: source
+title: "FAA Provides Final Approval for Starship IFT-12 — V3 Debut Targeting May 2026"
+author: "SpaceNews / Basenor / New Space Economy"
+url: https://spacenews.com/faa-provides-final-approval-for-next-starship-launch/
+date: 2026-05-01
+domain: space-development
+secondary_domains: []
+format: thread
+status: unprocessed
+priority: high
+tags: [Starship, IFT-12, V3, FAA-approval, Raptor-3, launch-date, SpaceX]
+intake_tier: research-task
+---
+
+## Content
+
+The FAA has granted final flight-safety approval for Starship Flight Test 12 (IFT-12), removing the primary regulatory gate that had blocked the launch since the IFT-11 anomaly investigation. This is a significant status change from prior monitoring: previous archives noted the FAA investigation as "ongoing" and "the hard gate." That gate is now open.
+
+Key details:
+- FAA has granted flight-safety approval for IFT-12
+- Remaining steps: maritime and airspace hazard notices (24 hours before launch), FAA safety inspector presence on-site
+- Target: early-to-mid May 2026
+- IFT-12 introduces the V3 Starship configuration (Ship 39, Booster 19 with 33 Raptor 3 engines)
+- SpaceX will attempt ocean soft landing for upper stage (not tower catch) — risk-appropriate for maiden V3 flight
+- FCC dual-license for Flights 12 AND 13 valid through June 28 — SpaceX intends both flights before end of June
+
+Additional context:
+- April 6 Starbase incident (RUD of unclear component) adds procedural uncertainty but FAA approval indicates this was resolved
+- Booster 19 and Ship 39 both completed full static fires (April 15-16)
+- V3 represents substantial upgrade: improved propellant loading, Raptor 3 engines with higher Isp and reliability
+
+## Agent Notes
+
+**Why this matters:** This is the binary event I've been tracking for six+ weeks. FAA approval means IFT-12 could launch within days, potentially as soon as early May 2026. The V3 configuration debut is the most significant Starship milestone since IFT-7 achieved first successful booster catch. V3 performance data (Raptor 3 Isp, vehicle mass fraction, reentry performance) will directly update Belief 2 (launch cost keystone) — if V3 achieves routine operations, the sub-$100/kg trajectory becomes more concrete.
+
+**What surprised me:** FAA approved despite the April 6 Starbase incident being unresolved publicly. This suggests the incident was not a safety concern for the upcoming launch — or was resolved through the investigation process.
+
+**What I expected but didn't find:** A specific launch date (rather than "early to mid May"). The absence of a hard date suggests SpaceX is still in final prep, not locked.
+
+**KB connections:**
+- [[Starship achieving routine operations at sub-100 dollars per kg is the single largest enabling condition for the entire space industrial economy]] — V3 is the next milestone on this trajectory
+- [[SpaceX vertical integration across launch broadband and manufacturing creates compounding cost advantages that no competitor can replicate piecemeal]] — IFT-12 success would widen the moat further
+
+**Extraction hints:** Primary claim: FAA final approval removes the gate that blocked IFT-12 since IFT-11 anomaly. Secondary claim: V3 configuration represents the highest-capability Starship variant yet (Raptor 3, improved propellant mass fraction). If IFT-12 succeeds, consider claim about V3 enabling specific cost trajectory milestones.
+
+**Context:** This updates the existing April 30 archive (2026-04-30-starship-ift12-may-2026-target-faa-gate.md) which noted "FAA investigation ongoing." The status has changed materially.
+
+## Curator Notes (structured handoff for extractor)
+PRIMARY CONNECTION: [[Starship achieving routine operations at sub-100 dollars per kg is the single largest enabling condition for the entire space industrial economy]]
+WHY ARCHIVED: FAA approval is the binary gate resolution — the event that unlocks the next Starship milestone on the cost-reduction trajectory. Prior archive noted investigation as ongoing; this resolves it.
+EXTRACTION HINT: Extract the event (FAA approval), the implication (IFT-12 launch imminent, May 2026), and the V3 configuration significance (Raptor 3, first V3 flight data will update cost trajectory claims). Do not conflate with IFT-11 or prior flights.
diff --git a/inbox/queue/2026-05-01-techi-spacex-ipo-may-prospectus-timeline-2026.md b/inbox/queue/2026-05-01-techi-spacex-ipo-may-prospectus-timeline-2026.md
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..073b42c08
--- /dev/null
+++ b/inbox/queue/2026-05-01-techi-spacex-ipo-may-prospectus-timeline-2026.md
@@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
+---
+type: source
+title: "SpaceX IPO Prospectus Timeline: S-1 Expected May 15-22, 2026; Starlink 2026 Revenue $20B+; Largest US Tech IPO in History"
+author: "Techi.com / Motley Fool / ARK Invest / Yahoo Finance / Tech Insider"
+url: https://www.techi.com/spacex-ipo/
+date: 2026-05-01
+domain: space-development
+secondary_domains: []
+format: thread
+status: unprocessed
+priority: medium
+tags: [SpaceX, IPO, S-1, Starlink, revenue, valuation, ARK-Invest, Nasdaq, Grok, xAI]
+intake_tier: research-task
+---
+
+## Content
+
+SpaceX's public S-1 prospectus is expected to be filed May 15-22, 2026, making it likely the most consequential financial disclosure for the space economy in history.
+
+**IPO Timeline:**
+- SEC requires registration statements at least 15 calendar days before marketing begins
+- Marketing week targeted: week of June 8, 2026
+- Nasdaq listing target: late June / early July 2026
+- Raise target: $75B
+- Valuation target: $1.75 trillion (with ARK Invest arguing $1.75T "may not be the ceiling")
+
+**Financial data (from confidential filing, now partially public):**
+- Starlink 2025 revenue: $11.4B (63% gross margins)
+- Total SpaceX 2025 revenue: ~$18.5B (Starlink = ~61%)
+- Starlink 2026 projected revenue: $20B+ (vs $11.4B 2025 — ~75% YoY growth)
+- Starlink subscribers: 10M+ active globally (early 2026)
+- Musk voting control: 79% via super-voting shares (on ~42% equity)
+
+**ARK Invest's SpaceX IPO Guide (April 2026):**
+- ARK makes the case that $1.75T may not be the ceiling based on Starlink TAM expansion, Grok AI services, and orbital compute optionality
+- Their model values Starlink connectivity alone at $1T+
+- AI services via Grok add an uncapped software layer
+
+**Yahoo Finance angle (investor note):**
+- "Investors want to buy a space stock, but they'll get an ISP instead" — Starlink connectivity (not rocket launches) is the primary business
+- Implication: SpaceX IPO is fundamentally an ISP/AI services company with an aerospace engineering moat, not a rocket company
+
+**Governance concentration note:**
+- Musk's 79% voting control at 42% equity is a super-voting structure with no precedent at this scale
+- The S-1 will be required to disclose this and its implications for minority shareholders
+- Dual layer of single-player dependency: (1) SpaceX as sole Western heavy-lift provider, (2) Musk as unchallenged executive at voting-controlled company now worth ~$2T
+
+## Agent Notes
+
+**Why this matters:** The S-1 prospectus (due in 2-3 weeks from today) will be the first full public disclosure of SpaceX's financials, Starlink operational metrics, and Starship development costs. This will provide the first ground-truth calibration of the flywheel thesis. Key questions the prospectus will answer: (1) Starlink 2026 revenue guidance vs. $20B projection, (2) Starship program costs and deployment cadence economics, (3) xAI integration financial treatment (asset write-up, R&D allocation), (4) launch cadence economics at 160 launches/year. This is the most important upcoming data disclosure for the space economy.
+
+**What surprised me:** The S-1 prospectus timeline is imminent — filing in 2-3 weeks. This is faster than I expected. Monitor for the actual filing in the next research session.
+
+**What I expected but didn't find:** The specific Starship program economics (how much does operating Starship cost per flight at current cadence). This will be in the S-1 — should be the first session priority when the prospectus drops.
+
+**KB connections:**
+- [[SpaceX vertical integration across launch broadband and manufacturing creates compounding cost advantages that no competitor can replicate piecemeal]] — S-1 will quantify the compounding for the first time
+- Belief 7 (single-player dependency): The 79% super-voting structure amplifies the executive-level single-player risk beyond the market-level risk. S-1 will formalize this.
+
+**Extraction hints:**
+1. When S-1 drops: extract specific launch economics ($/flight, margin per Falcon 9 launch), Starship deployment costs, Starlink growth trajectory, and xAI financial treatment
+2. Near-term: extract the Yahoo Finance framing as a claim — "SpaceX's IPO economic value is driven by Starlink internet subscription economics, not rocket launches, reframing it as an ISP with an aerospace moat" — this challenges the common "space company" framing
+
+**Context:** Prior archive (2026-04-30-spacex-ipo-s1-starlink-revenue-margins-ipo-details.md) covers the April 23 data ($11.4B revenue, 63% margins). This archive updates with: (1) S-1 filing timeline (May 15-22), (2) marketing/listing dates, (3) ARK's ceiling argument, (4) the ISP-vs-space-company framing, (5) Starlink $20B 2026 projection. Monitor closely for actual S-1 filing.
+
+## Curator Notes (structured handoff for extractor)
+PRIMARY CONNECTION: [[SpaceX vertical integration across launch broadband and manufacturing creates compounding cost advantages that no competitor can replicate piecemeal]]
+WHY ARCHIVED: S-1 prospectus is the most significant upcoming financial disclosure for the space domain — will quantify the flywheel thesis for the first time. Timeline update (May 15-22 filing, June 8 marketing) is immediately actionable for monitoring. The "ISP not space company" framing is a claim candidate that reframes SpaceX's economic identity.
+EXTRACTION HINT: Prioritize the ISP-vs-space-company claim — it's a concrete reframing that challenges common narrative assumptions. S-1 actual filing should trigger urgent extraction session with full financial data. Current archive is pre-S-1; post-S-1 archive will have the primary source data.