diff --git a/inbox/archive/2026-00-00-friederich-against-manhattan-project-alignment.md b/inbox/archive/2026-00-00-friederich-against-manhattan-project-alignment.md
index 488981e2..52266d5e 100644
--- a/inbox/archive/2026-00-00-friederich-against-manhattan-project-alignment.md
+++ b/inbox/archive/2026-00-00-friederich-against-manhattan-project-alignment.md
@@ -7,9 +7,14 @@ date: 2026-01-01
 domain: ai-alignment
 secondary_domains: []
 format: paper
-status: unprocessed
+status: null-result
 priority: medium
 tags: [alignment-framing, Manhattan-project, operationalization, philosophical, AI-safety]
+processed_by: theseus
+processed_date: 2026-03-11
+enrichments_applied: ["AI alignment is a coordination problem not a technical problem.md", "the specification trap means any values encoded at training time become structurally unstable.md", "some disagreements are permanently irreducible.md"]
+extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
+extraction_notes: "Extracted one composite claim covering the five-point philosophical critique of Manhattan Project framing. Applied three enrichments to existing coordination and specification claims. Full text paywalled—extraction based on abstract and secondary discussion. The operationalizability impossibility claim is particularly strong and warrants follow-up if full text becomes available."
 ---
 
 ## Content