From 24ed193d082f4b00f519e83e63415ed3e8cd3519 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Teleo Agents Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2026 06:06:58 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] theseus: extract from 2026-00-00-friederich-against-manhattan-project-alignment.md - Source: inbox/archive/2026-00-00-friederich-against-manhattan-project-alignment.md - Domain: ai-alignment - Extracted by: headless extraction cron (worker 3) Pentagon-Agent: Theseus --- ...00-00-friederich-against-manhattan-project-alignment.md | 7 ++++++- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/inbox/archive/2026-00-00-friederich-against-manhattan-project-alignment.md b/inbox/archive/2026-00-00-friederich-against-manhattan-project-alignment.md index 488981e2..52266d5e 100644 --- a/inbox/archive/2026-00-00-friederich-against-manhattan-project-alignment.md +++ b/inbox/archive/2026-00-00-friederich-against-manhattan-project-alignment.md @@ -7,9 +7,14 @@ date: 2026-01-01 domain: ai-alignment secondary_domains: [] format: paper -status: unprocessed +status: null-result priority: medium tags: [alignment-framing, Manhattan-project, operationalization, philosophical, AI-safety] +processed_by: theseus +processed_date: 2026-03-11 +enrichments_applied: ["AI alignment is a coordination problem not a technical problem.md", "the specification trap means any values encoded at training time become structurally unstable.md", "some disagreements are permanently irreducible.md"] +extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5" +extraction_notes: "Extracted one composite claim covering the five-point philosophical critique of Manhattan Project framing. Applied three enrichments to existing coordination and specification claims. Full text paywalled—extraction based on abstract and secondary discussion. The operationalizability impossibility claim is particularly strong and warrants follow-up if full text becomes available." --- ## Content