diff --git a/inbox/archive/2026-01-13-nasaa-clarity-act-concerns.md b/inbox/archive/2026-01-13-nasaa-clarity-act-concerns.md
index 9f4bb4e0..5c3c99ff 100644
--- a/inbox/archive/2026-01-13-nasaa-clarity-act-concerns.md
+++ b/inbox/archive/2026-01-13-nasaa-clarity-act-concerns.md
@@ -7,9 +7,14 @@ date: 2026-01-13
 domain: internet-finance
 secondary_domains: []
 format: article
-status: unprocessed
+status: null-result
 priority: medium
 tags: [nasaa, regulation, clarity-act, state-regulators, federal-preemption, investor-protection]
+processed_by: rio
+processed_date: 2026-03-11
+enrichments_applied: ["futarchy-based fundraising creates regulatory separation because there are no beneficial owners and investment decisions emerge from market forces not centralized control.md", "Living Capital vehicles likely fail the Howey test for securities classification because the structural separation of capital raise from investment decision eliminates the efforts of others prong.md"]
+extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
+extraction_notes: "Extracted two claims about state-level regulatory opposition coordination. Primary insight is the cross-agency (securities + gaming) coordination pattern suggesting broader institutional resistance to federal digital asset preemption. Enriched two existing claims about regulatory separation with counterevidence from state-level enforcement risk. Source PDF was not directly accessible so specific NASAA arguments are inferred from context."
 ---
 
 ## Content
@@ -32,3 +37,9 @@ This aligns with the 36 states filing amicus briefs against federal preemption i
 PRIMARY CONNECTION: [[Internet finance is an industry transition from traditional finance where the attractor state replaces intermediaries with programmable coordination and market-tested governance]]
 WHY ARCHIVED: State-level opposition coalition represents a friction force against the internet finance transition. Important counterevidence to the "regulatory clarity is increasing" narrative.
 EXTRACTION HINT: Focus on state-level opposition as friction force — adds nuance to regulatory landscape claims.
+
+
+## Key Facts
+- NASAA filed formal concerns about the CLARITY Act on January 13, 2026
+- NASAA represents securities regulators from all 50 states, DC, Puerto Rico, US Virgin Islands, and Canadian provinces
+- 36 states filed amicus briefs against federal preemption in prediction market cases