auto-fix: strip 44 broken wiki links
Pipeline auto-fixer: removed [[ ]] brackets from links that don't resolve to existing claims in the knowledge base.
This commit is contained in:
Teleo Agents
parent
5f8cf7551d
commit
25c7a1f9a4
9 changed files with 43 additions and 43 deletions
|
|
@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ source: "MetaDAO Terms of Service, Founder/Operator Legal Pack, inbox research f
|
|||
|
||||
MetaDAO is the platform that makes futarchy governance practical for token launches and ongoing project governance. It is currently the only launchpad where every project gets futarchy governance from day one, and where treasury spending is structurally constrained through conditional markets rather than discretionary team control.
|
||||
|
||||
**What MetaDAO is.** A futarchy-as-a-service platform on Solana. Projects apply, get evaluated via futarchy proposals, raise capital through STAMP agreements, and launch with futarchy governance embedded. Since [[MetaDAOs Cayman SPC houses all launched projects as ring-fenced SegCos under a single entity with MetaDAO LLC as sole Director]], the platform provides both the governance mechanism and the legal chassis.
|
||||
**What MetaDAO is.** A futarchy-as-a-service platform on Solana. Projects apply, get evaluated via futarchy proposals, raise capital through STAMP agreements, and launch with futarchy governance embedded. Since MetaDAOs Cayman SPC houses all launched projects as ring-fenced SegCos under a single entity with MetaDAO LLC as sole Director, the platform provides both the governance mechanism and the legal chassis.
|
||||
|
||||
**The entity.** MetaDAO LLC is a Republic of the Marshall Islands DAO limited liability company (852 Lagoon Rd, Majuro, MH 96960). It serves as sole Director of the Futarchy Governance SPC (Cayman Islands). Contact: kollan@metadao.fi. Kollan House (known as "Nallok" on social media) is the key operator.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ MetaDAO is the platform that makes futarchy governance practical for token launc
|
|||
|
||||
**Standard token issuance template:** 10M token base issuance + 2M AMM + 900K Meteora + performance package. Projects customize within this framework.
|
||||
|
||||
**Unruggable ICO model.** MetaDAO's innovation is the "unruggable ICO" -- initial token sales where everyone participates at the same price with no privileged seed or private rounds. Combined with STAMP spending allowances and futarchy governance, this prevents the treasury extraction that killed legacy ICOs. Since [[STAMP replaces SAFE plus token warrant by adding futarchy-governed treasury spending allowances that prevent the extraction problem that killed legacy ICOs]], the investment instrument and governance are designed as a system.
|
||||
**Unruggable ICO model.** MetaDAO's innovation is the "unruggable ICO" -- initial token sales where everyone participates at the same price with no privileged seed or private rounds. Combined with STAMP spending allowances and futarchy governance, this prevents the treasury extraction that killed legacy ICOs. Since STAMP replaces SAFE plus token warrant by adding futarchy-governed treasury spending allowances that prevent the extraction problem that killed legacy ICOs, the investment instrument and governance are designed as a system.
|
||||
|
||||
**Ecosystem (launched projects as of early 2026):**
|
||||
- **MetaDAO** ($META) — the platform itself
|
||||
|
|
@ -56,29 +56,29 @@ Raises include: Ranger ($6M minimum, uncapped), Solomon ($102.9M committed, $8M
|
|||
|
||||
**Treasury deployment (Mar 2026).** @oxranga proposed formation of a DAO treasury subcommittee with $150k legal/compliance budget as staged path to deploy the DAO treasury — the first concrete governance proposal to operationalize treasury management with institutional scaffolding.
|
||||
|
||||
**MetaLeX partnership.** Since [[MetaLex BORG structure provides automated legal entity formation for futarchy-governed investment vehicles through Cayman SPC segregated portfolios with on-chain representation]], the go-forward infrastructure automates entity creation. MetaLeX services are "recommended and configured as default" but not mandatory. Economics: $150K advance + 7% of platform fees for 3 years per BORG.
|
||||
**MetaLeX partnership.** Since MetaLex BORG structure provides automated legal entity formation for futarchy-governed investment vehicles through Cayman SPC segregated portfolios with on-chain representation, the go-forward infrastructure automates entity creation. MetaLeX services are "recommended and configured as default" but not mandatory. Economics: $150K advance + 7% of platform fees for 3 years per BORG.
|
||||
|
||||
**Institutional validation (Feb 2026).** Theia Capital holds MetaDAO specifically for "prioritizing investors over teams" — identifying this as the competitive moat that creates network effects and switching costs in token launches. Theia describes MetaDAO as addressing "the Token Problem" (the lemon market dynamic in token launches). This is significant because Theia is a rigorous, fundamentals-driven fund using Kelly Criterion sizing and Bayesian updating — not a momentum trader. Their MetaDAO position is a structural bet on the platform's competitive advantage, not a narrative trade. (Source: Theia 2025 Annual Letter, Feb 12 2026)
|
||||
|
||||
**Why MetaDAO matters for Living Capital.** Since [[Living Capital vehicles pair Living Agent domain expertise with futarchy-governed investment to direct capital toward crucial innovations]], MetaDAO is the existing platform where Rio's fund would launch. The entire legal + governance + token infrastructure already exists. The question is not whether to build this from scratch but whether MetaDAO's existing platform serves Living Capital's needs well enough -- or whether modifications are needed.
|
||||
|
||||
**Three-tier dispute resolution:** Protocol decisions via futarchy (on-chain), technical disputes via review panel, legal disputes via JAMS arbitration (Cayman Islands). The layered approach means on-chain governance handles day-to-day decisions while legal mechanisms provide fallback. Since [[MetaDAOs three-layer legal hierarchy separates formation agreements from contractual relationships from regulatory armor with each layer using different enforcement mechanisms]], the governance and legal structures are designed to work together.
|
||||
**Three-tier dispute resolution:** Protocol decisions via futarchy (on-chain), technical disputes via review panel, legal disputes via JAMS arbitration (Cayman Islands). The layered approach means on-chain governance handles day-to-day decisions while legal mechanisms provide fallback. Since MetaDAOs three-layer legal hierarchy separates formation agreements from contractual relationships from regulatory armor with each layer using different enforcement mechanisms, the governance and legal structures are designed to work together.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Additional Evidence (extend)
|
||||
*Source: [[2026-01-01-futardio-launch-mycorealms]] | Added: 2026-03-11 | Extractor: anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5*
|
||||
*Source: 2026-01-01-futardio-launch-mycorealms | Added: 2026-03-11 | Extractor: anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5*
|
||||
|
||||
MycoRealms launch on Futardio demonstrates MetaDAO platform capabilities in production: $125,000 USDC raise with 72-hour permissionless window, automatic treasury deployment if target reached, full refunds if target missed. Launch structure includes 10M ICO tokens (62.9% of supply), 2.9M tokens for liquidity provision (2M on Futarchy AMM, 900K on Meteora pool), with 20% of funds raised ($25K) paired with LP tokens. First physical infrastructure project (mushroom farm) using the platform, extending futarchy governance from digital to real-world operations with measurable outcomes (temperature, humidity, CO2, yield).
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Additional Evidence (extend)
|
||||
*Source: [[2026-03-03-futardio-launch-futardio-cult]] | Added: 2026-03-11 | Extractor: anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5*
|
||||
*Source: 2026-03-03-futardio-launch-futardio-cult | Added: 2026-03-11 | Extractor: anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5*
|
||||
|
||||
Futardio cult launch (2026-03-03 to 2026-03-04) demonstrates MetaDAO's platform supports purely speculative meme coin launches, not just productive ventures. The project raised $11,402,898 against a $50,000 target in under 24 hours (22,706% oversubscription) with stated fund use for 'fan merch, token listings, private events/partys'—consumption rather than productive infrastructure. This extends MetaDAO's demonstrated use cases beyond productive infrastructure (Myco Realms mushroom farm, $125K) to governance-enhanced speculative tokens, suggesting futarchy's anti-rug mechanisms appeal across asset classes.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Additional Evidence (extend)
|
||||
*Source: [[2026-03-07-futardio-launch-areal]] | Added: 2026-03-11 | Extractor: anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5*
|
||||
*Source: 2026-03-07-futardio-launch-areal | Added: 2026-03-11 | Extractor: anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5*
|
||||
|
||||
(challenge) Areal's failed Futardio launch ($11,654 raised of $50K target, REFUNDING status) demonstrates that futarchy-governed fundraising does not guarantee capital formation success. The mechanism provides credible exit guarantees through market-governed liquidation and governance quality through conditional markets, but market participants still evaluate project fundamentals and team credibility. Futarchy reduces rug risk but does not eliminate market skepticism of unproven business models or early-stage teams.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -91,12 +91,12 @@ Pine Analytics Q4 2025 data confirms platform scale: 8 ICOs, $25.6M raised, $390
|
|||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Relevant Notes:
|
||||
- [[MetaDAOs Cayman SPC houses all launched projects as ring-fenced SegCos under a single entity with MetaDAO LLC as sole Director]] -- the legal structure housing all projects
|
||||
- MetaDAOs Cayman SPC houses all launched projects as ring-fenced SegCos under a single entity with MetaDAO LLC as sole Director -- the legal structure housing all projects
|
||||
- [[MetaDAOs Autocrat program implements futarchy through conditional token markets where proposals create parallel pass and fail universes settled by time-weighted average price over a three-day window]] -- the governance mechanism
|
||||
- [[STAMP replaces SAFE plus token warrant by adding futarchy-governed treasury spending allowances that prevent the extraction problem that killed legacy ICOs]] -- the investment instrument
|
||||
- [[MetaLex BORG structure provides automated legal entity formation for futarchy-governed investment vehicles through Cayman SPC segregated portfolios with on-chain representation]] -- the automated legal infrastructure
|
||||
- [[MetaDAOs three-layer legal hierarchy separates formation agreements from contractual relationships from regulatory armor with each layer using different enforcement mechanisms]] -- the legal architecture
|
||||
- [[two legal paths through MetaDAO create a governance binding spectrum from commercially reasonable efforts to legally binding and determinative]] -- the governance binding options
|
||||
- STAMP replaces SAFE plus token warrant by adding futarchy-governed treasury spending allowances that prevent the extraction problem that killed legacy ICOs -- the investment instrument
|
||||
- MetaLex BORG structure provides automated legal entity formation for futarchy-governed investment vehicles through Cayman SPC segregated portfolios with on-chain representation -- the automated legal infrastructure
|
||||
- MetaDAOs three-layer legal hierarchy separates formation agreements from contractual relationships from regulatory armor with each layer using different enforcement mechanisms -- the legal architecture
|
||||
- two legal paths through MetaDAO create a governance binding spectrum from commercially reasonable efforts to legally binding and determinative -- the governance binding options
|
||||
- [[Living Capital vehicles pair Living Agent domain expertise with futarchy-governed investment to direct capital toward crucial innovations]] -- why MetaDAO matters for Living Capital
|
||||
|
||||
Topics:
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ This evidence has direct implications for governance design. It suggests that [[
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
### Additional Evidence (challenge)
|
||||
*Source: [[2025-06-12-optimism-futarchy-v1-preliminary-findings]] | Added: 2026-03-11 | Extractor: anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5*
|
||||
*Source: 2025-06-12-optimism-futarchy-v1-preliminary-findings | Added: 2026-03-11 | Extractor: anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5*
|
||||
|
||||
Optimism's futarchy experiment achieved 5,898 total trades from 430 active forecasters (average 13.6 transactions per person) over 21 days, with 88.6% being first-time Optimism governance participants. This suggests futarchy CAN attract substantial engagement when implemented at scale with proper incentives, contradicting the limited-volume pattern observed in MetaDAO. Key differences: Optimism used play money (lower barrier to entry), had institutional backing (Uniswap Foundation co-sponsor), and involved grant selection (clearer stakes) rather than protocol governance decisions. The participation breadth (10 countries, 4 continents, 36 new users/day) suggests the limited-volume finding may be specific to MetaDAO's implementation or use case rather than a structural futarchy limitation.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -35,5 +35,5 @@ Relevant Notes:
|
|||
- [[MetaDAO is the futarchy launchpad on Solana where projects raise capital through unruggable ICOs governed by conditional markets creating the first platform for ownership coins at scale]]
|
||||
|
||||
Topics:
|
||||
- [[domains/internet-finance/_map]]
|
||||
- [[core/mechanisms/_map]]
|
||||
- domains/internet-finance/_map
|
||||
- core/mechanisms/_map
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ Critically, the proposal nullifies a prior 90-day restriction on buybacks/liquid
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
### Additional Evidence (extend)
|
||||
*Source: [[2026-01-01-futardio-launch-mycorealms]] | Added: 2026-03-11 | Extractor: anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5*
|
||||
*Source: 2026-01-01-futardio-launch-mycorealms | Added: 2026-03-11 | Extractor: anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5*
|
||||
|
||||
MycoRealms implements unruggable ICO structure with automatic refund mechanism: if $125,000 target not reached within 72 hours, full refunds execute automatically. Post-raise, team has zero direct treasury access — operates on $10,000 monthly allowance with all other expenditures requiring futarchy approval. This creates credible commitment: team cannot rug because they cannot access treasury directly, and investors can force liquidation through futarchy proposals if team materially misrepresents (e.g., fails to publish operational data to Arweave as promised, diverts funds from stated use). Transparency requirement (all invoices, expenses, harvest records, photos published to Arweave) creates verifiable baseline for detecting misrepresentation.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -34,5 +34,5 @@ Relevant Notes:
|
|||
- [[futarchy adoption faces friction from token price psychology proposal complexity and liquidity requirements]]
|
||||
|
||||
Topics:
|
||||
- [[domains/internet-finance/_map]]
|
||||
- [[core/mechanisms/_map]]
|
||||
- domains/internet-finance/_map
|
||||
- core/mechanisms/_map
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -40,5 +40,5 @@ Relevant Notes:
|
|||
- [[futarchy-governed liquidation is the enforcement mechanism that makes unruggable ICOs credible because investors can force full treasury return when teams materially misrepresent]]
|
||||
|
||||
Topics:
|
||||
- [[domains/internet-finance/_map]]
|
||||
- [[core/mechanisms/_map]]
|
||||
- domains/internet-finance/_map
|
||||
- core/mechanisms/_map
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ Relevant Notes:
|
|||
- [[ownership alignment turns network effects from extractive to generative]] — explains the consequences of broken ownership structures
|
||||
- [[the alignment problem dissolves when human values are continuously woven into the system rather than specified in advance]] — shows how structural misalignment blocks alignment solutions
|
||||
- [[quadratic voting fails for crypto because Sybil resistance and collusion prevention are unsolvable]] — quadratic voting also fails to provide the minority protection that token voting DAOs need
|
||||
- [[mechanism design changes the game itself to produce better equilibria rather than expecting players to find optimal strategies]] -- token voting DAOs fail precisely because they lack mechanism design: the game's rules make majority extraction rational, and no amount of goodwill changes the equilibrium without restructuring the payoffs
|
||||
- mechanism design changes the game itself to produce better equilibria rather than expecting players to find optimal strategies -- token voting DAOs fail precisely because they lack mechanism design: the game's rules make majority extraction rational, and no amount of goodwill changes the equilibrium without restructuring the payoffs
|
||||
|
||||
Topics:
|
||||
- [[livingip overview]]
|
||||
|
|
@ -41,10 +41,10 @@ The dominant DEX aggregator on Solana — routes trades across all Solana AMMs t
|
|||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Relevant Entities:
|
||||
- [[omnipair]] — SDK integration (highest-impact catalyst)
|
||||
- [[meteora]] — routed AMM
|
||||
- [[raydium]] — routed AMM
|
||||
- [[ranger-finance]] — former aggregation client (liquidated)
|
||||
- omnipair — SDK integration (highest-impact catalyst)
|
||||
- meteora — routed AMM
|
||||
- raydium — routed AMM
|
||||
- ranger-finance — former aggregation client (liquidated)
|
||||
|
||||
Topics:
|
||||
- [[internet finance and decision markets]]
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ tracked_by: rio
|
|||
created: 2026-03-11
|
||||
last_updated: 2026-03-11
|
||||
founded: 2023-01-01
|
||||
founders: ["[[proph3t]]"]
|
||||
founders: ["proph3t"]
|
||||
category: "Futarchy governance protocol + ownership coin launchpad (Solana)"
|
||||
stage: growth
|
||||
key_metrics:
|
||||
|
|
@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ key_metrics:
|
|||
ecosystem_launches: "45 (via Futardio)"
|
||||
futarchic_amm_lp_share: "~20% of each project's token supply"
|
||||
proposal_volume: "$3.6M Q4 2025 (up from $205K in Q3)"
|
||||
competitors: ["[[snapshot]]", "[[tally]]"]
|
||||
competitors: ["snapshot", "tally"]
|
||||
built_on: ["Solana"]
|
||||
tags: ["futarchy", "decision-markets", "ownership-coins", "governance", "launchpad"]
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
|
@ -53,21 +53,21 @@ The futarchy governance protocol on Solana. Implements decision markets through
|
|||
- **2026-03** — Ranger liquidation proposal; treasury subcommittee formation
|
||||
- **2026-03** — Pine Analytics Q4 2025 quarterly report published
|
||||
|
||||
- **2024-02-18** — [[metadao-otc-trade-pantera-capital]] failed: Pantera Capital's $50,000 OTC purchase proposal rejected by futarchy markets
|
||||
- **2024-02-18** — metadao-otc-trade-pantera-capital failed: Pantera Capital's $50,000 OTC purchase proposal rejected by futarchy markets
|
||||
- **2026-03** — Pine Analytics comparison: MetaDAO futarchy decision generated $40K volume across 122 trades vs Jupiter DAO proposal with 303 views/2 comments, demonstrating 20,000x capital commitment differential
|
||||
## Key Decisions
|
||||
| Date | Proposal | Proposer | Category | Outcome |
|
||||
|------|----------|----------|----------|---------|
|
||||
| 2024-03-03 | [[metadao-burn-993-percent-meta]] | doctor.sol & rar3 | Treasury | Passed |
|
||||
| 2024-03-13 | [[metadao-develop-faas]] | 0xNallok | Strategy | Passed |
|
||||
| 2024-03-28 | [[metadao-migrate-autocrat-v02]] | HenryE & Proph3t | Mechanism | Passed |
|
||||
| 2024-05-27 | [[metadao-compensation-proph3t-nallok]] | Proph3t & Nallok | Hiring | Passed |
|
||||
| 2024-06-26 | [[metadao-fundraise-2]] | Proph3t | Fundraise | Passed |
|
||||
| 2024-11-21 | [[metadao-create-futardio]] | unknown | Strategy | Failed |
|
||||
| 2025-01-28 | [[metadao-token-split-elastic-supply]] | @aradtski | Mechanism | Failed |
|
||||
| 2025-02-10 | [[metadao-hire-robin-hanson]] | Proph3t | Hiring | Passed |
|
||||
| 2025-02-26 | [[metadao-release-launchpad]] | Proph3t & Kollan | Strategy | Passed |
|
||||
| 2025-08-07 | [[metadao-migrate-meta-token]] | Proph3t & Kollan | Mechanism | Passed |
|
||||
| 2024-03-03 | metadao-burn-993-percent-meta | doctor.sol & rar3 | Treasury | Passed |
|
||||
| 2024-03-13 | metadao-develop-faas | 0xNallok | Strategy | Passed |
|
||||
| 2024-03-28 | metadao-migrate-autocrat-v02 | HenryE & Proph3t | Mechanism | Passed |
|
||||
| 2024-05-27 | metadao-compensation-proph3t-nallok | Proph3t & Nallok | Hiring | Passed |
|
||||
| 2024-06-26 | metadao-fundraise-2 | Proph3t | Fundraise | Passed |
|
||||
| 2024-11-21 | metadao-create-futardio | unknown | Strategy | Failed |
|
||||
| 2025-01-28 | metadao-token-split-elastic-supply | @aradtski | Mechanism | Failed |
|
||||
| 2025-02-10 | metadao-hire-robin-hanson | Proph3t | Hiring | Passed |
|
||||
| 2025-02-26 | metadao-release-launchpad | Proph3t & Kollan | Strategy | Passed |
|
||||
| 2025-08-07 | metadao-migrate-meta-token | Proph3t & Kollan | Mechanism | Passed |
|
||||
|
||||
## Competitive Position
|
||||
- **First mover** in futarchy-governed organizations at scale
|
||||
|
|
@ -93,15 +93,15 @@ MetaDAO is the platform bet on futarchy as a governance mechanism. If decision m
|
|||
- [[MetaDAOs Autocrat program implements futarchy through conditional token markets where proposals create parallel pass and fail universes settled by time-weighted average price over a three-day window]] — mechanism description
|
||||
- [[MetaDAOs futarchy implementation shows limited trading volume in uncontested decisions]] — known limitation
|
||||
- [[futarchy-governed permissionless launches require brand separation to manage reputational liability because failed projects on a curated platform damage the platforms credibility]] — active design challenge
|
||||
- [[DAO governance degenerates into political capture because proposal processes select for coalition-building skill over operational competence and the resulting bureaucracy creates structural speed disadvantages against focused competitors]] — the problem MetaDAO solves
|
||||
- DAO governance degenerates into political capture because proposal processes select for coalition-building skill over operational competence and the resulting bureaucracy creates structural speed disadvantages against focused competitors — the problem MetaDAO solves
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Relevant Entities:
|
||||
- [[omnipair]] — leverage infrastructure for ecosystem
|
||||
- [[proph3t]] — founder
|
||||
- [[solomon]] — ecosystem launch
|
||||
- [[futardio]] — launch platform
|
||||
- omnipair — leverage infrastructure for ecosystem
|
||||
- proph3t — founder
|
||||
- solomon — ecosystem launch
|
||||
- futardio — launch platform
|
||||
|
||||
Topics:
|
||||
- [[internet finance and decision markets]]
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue