diff --git a/inbox/archive/2026-03-09-pineanalytics-x-archive.md b/inbox/archive/2026-03-09-pineanalytics-x-archive.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..97479c3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/inbox/archive/2026-03-09-pineanalytics-x-archive.md
@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
+---
+type: source
+title: "@PineAnalytics X archive — 100 most recent tweets"
+author: "Pine Analytics (@PineAnalytics)"
+url: https://x.com/PineAnalytics
+date: 2026-03-09
+domain: internet-finance
+format: tweet
+status: unprocessed
+tags: [metadao, analytics, futardio, decision-markets, governance-data, jupiter]
+linked_set: metadao-x-landscape-2026-03
+curator_notes: |
+  On-chain analytics research hub — the data arm of the MetaDAO ecosystem. Pine produced
+  the Q4 2025 quarterly report and Futardio launch metrics. Their work is pure data with
+  minimal editorial — exactly the kind of source that produces high-confidence enrichments
+  to existing claims. Key contribution: decision market participation data, ICO performance
+  metrics, and comparative governance analysis (Jupiter voting vs MetaDAO futarchy). Already
+  have an existing archive for the Q4 report (2026-03-03-pineanalytics-metadao-q4-2025-quarterly-report.md)
+  and Futardio launch (2026-03-05-pineanalytics-futardio-launch-metrics.md).
+extraction_hints:
+  - "Decision market data across multiple proposals — volume, trader count, alignment percentages"
+  - "bankme -55% in 45min vs MetaDAO protections — data point for 'futarchy-governed liquidation' claim"
+  - "Jupiter governance comparison: 303 views, 2 comments vs futarchy $40K volume / 122 trades — enriches 'token voting DAOs offer no minority protection' claim"
+  - "Futardio launch metrics already partially archived — check for new data not in existing archive"
+  - "Cross-reference with existing archives to avoid duplication"
+priority: medium
+---
+
+# @PineAnalytics X Archive (March 2026)
+
+## Substantive Tweets
+
+### Decision Market Data
+- Tracks volume and participation across MetaDAO governance proposals
+- Provides the quantitative backbone for claims about futarchy effectiveness
+- Key data: contested decisions show dramatically higher engagement than routine ones
+- bankme token dropped 55% in 45 minutes — contrast with MetaDAO ecosystem where no ICO has gone below launch price
+
+### Jupiter Governance Comparison
+- Jupiter governance proposal: 303 views, 2 comments
+- MetaDAO futarchy equivalent: $40K volume, 122 trades
+- The engagement differential is stark — markets produce real participation where forums produce silence
+- This is the strongest empirical argument for futarchy over token voting
+
+### MetaDAO Q4 2025 Report
+- Comprehensive quarterly metrics (already archived separately)
+- 8 ICOs, $25.6M raised, $390M committed
+- $300M AMM volume, $1.5M in fees
+- 95% refund rate from oversubscription — capital efficiency metric
+
+### Futardio Launch Metrics
+- Already partially archived separately
+- Additional data: participation demographics, wallet analysis, time-to-fill curves
+- First permissionless raise performance compared to curated MetaDAO ICOs
+
+## Noise Filtered Out
+- Mostly retweets and community engagement
+- Original content is almost exclusively data-driven — very little opinion