pipeline: archive 1 source(s) post-merge
Pentagon-Agent: Epimetheus <3D35839A-7722-4740-B93D-51157F7D5E70>
This commit is contained in:
parent
a46b841179
commit
26aca9b48b
1 changed files with 42 additions and 0 deletions
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
type: source
|
||||||
|
source_type: x-research
|
||||||
|
title: "X research: metaDAO governance proposal"
|
||||||
|
date: 2026-03-23
|
||||||
|
domain: internet-finance
|
||||||
|
status: processed
|
||||||
|
proposed_by: "@m3taversal"
|
||||||
|
contribution_type: research-direction
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@UmbraPrivacy: One day left: 84% likelihood to pass, $408k traded.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
While the broader mood shifts, community governance keeps moving. Your protocol, rain or shine 🌥️
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Vote here: https://t.co/Wrgnd7Tsih https://t.co/
|
||||||
|
@LauncherEco: What we're working on right now for Launcher:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
We're adding MetaDAO-style multi-outcome futarchy to Moloch.sol as an autonomous governance mechanism where proposal outcomes are determined by comparing
|
||||||
|
@01Resolved: 2/ The proposal is intentionally broad and operationally heavy. It aims to:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* Migrate MetaDAO to a new onchain DAO & program
|
||||||
|
* Update legal docs (Operating Agreement + MSA)
|
||||||
|
* Migrate treasury & liqui
|
||||||
|
@project_miko: saw point out that every major crypto letdown usually boils down to some unreadable governance failure. honestly? facts. getting slow-rugged by a 50-page forum proposal that 3 whales voted on is peak
|
||||||
|
@defiprime: Result: liquidity pulled, 5.047M USDC returned to unlocked RNGR holders (~$0.78 book value), IP returned to the team.
|
||||||
|
On-chain governance delivering capital return. This is the power of DAOs.
|
||||||
|
https://
|
||||||
|
@BetQuant: Another day, another crypto governance drama.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Remember Ranger — the “first perp aggregator on Solana” that raised $8M+ on MetaDAO?
|
||||||
|
Now MetaDAO is considering shutting the project down and returning f
|
||||||
|
@Blackprosper001: 4️⃣Compared to existing protocols?
|
||||||
|
Nothing comes close.
|
||||||
|
Standard DAOs(Maker,Uniswap): Proposal-based,often bureaucratic.
|
||||||
|
Futarchy(MetaDAO):Prediction markets–clever,but still explicit bets.
|
||||||
|
On-chain g
|
||||||
|
@AMINABankGlobal: Through its futarchy-inspired approach to governance, MetaDAO aims to solve this.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
One such example is the lockup of funds raised until proposal spends are approved by prediction market outcomes (as o
|
||||||
|
@position_xbt: MetaDAO just dropped a new tradable proposal to fund six months of futarchy research at George Mason University. Led by economist Robin Hanson, this engagement aims to rigorously study market-based go
|
||||||
|
@hex_anon33: @Jossey91 MetaDAO operates on market-based governance, removing insider advantages entirely. If the proposal doesn’t pass, every contributor is automatically refunded. Risk free. Transparent. Communit
|
||||||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue