diff --git a/decisions/internet-finance/metadao-meta036-hanson-futarchy-research.md b/decisions/internet-finance/metadao-meta036-hanson-futarchy-research.md
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..100628196
--- /dev/null
+++ b/decisions/internet-finance/metadao-meta036-hanson-futarchy-research.md
@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
+# META-036: Academic Futarchy Research Funding
+
+**Proposal ID:** Dt6QxTtaPz87oEK4m95ztP36wZCXA9LGLrJf1sDYAwxi
+**Amount:** $80,007 USDC
+**Duration:** 6 months
+**Status:** Active (as of March 23, 2026)
+
+## Overview
+
+Funding for academic research at George Mason University to produce "first rigorous experimental evidence on information-aggregation efficiency of futarchy governance." Led by Robin Hanson (futarchy inventor) with Dr. Daniel Houser as co-investigator.
+
+## Research Design
+
+- 500 student participants ($50 each)
+- Controlled experimental economics methodology
+- IRB-reviewed protocol
+- Focus on testing information aggregation mechanisms
+
+## Budget Breakdown
+
+- Robin Hanson summer salary: ~$30,000
+- Graduate Research Assistant: ~$19,000
+- Participant payments: $25,000 (500 × $50)
+- Daniel Houser co-PI: ~$6,000
+- **Total:** $80,007
+
+## Market Performance
+
+- **Likelihood:** 50% (as of March 21, 2026)
+- **Volume:** $42,160
+- **Duration:** ~2 days remaining
+- **Outcome:** Unresolved at time of archive (March 23, 2026)
+
+## Significance
+
+This proposal represents:
+
+1. **First academic validation attempt:** Hanson designing experiments to test whether futarchy markets actually produce better information aggregation confirms the mechanism is considered empirically open by futarchy's inventor
+
+2. **Mechanism separation:** Study design will primarily test Mechanism A (calibration selection under controlled conditions) rather than Mechanism B (information acquisition and strategic revelation in real-money markets)
+
+3. **Recursive structure:** MetaDAO using futarchy governance to fund futarchy research creates interesting epistemic properties—market reveals community belief about whether academic validation increases ecosystem value
+
+## Market Interpretation
+
+The 50% likelihood reveals even split on marginal value of academic validation, potentially reflecting:
+
+- Skepticism about academic validation translating to ecosystem growth
+- Indifference to academic legitimacy among participants who already believe in futarchy
+- Cost-benefit concerns about $80K relative to expected benefit
+
+The even split is evidence of calibration about marginal value, not evidence against futarchy working.
+
+## Research Gap Identified
+
+META-036 documents that Mechanism B (the operative theoretical claim for futarchy's epistemic advantage) lacks experimental validation. Follow-up study with real-money markets would be needed to test Mechanism B directly.
+
+## Expected Timeline
+
+- **Proposal resolution:** ~March 23, 2026
+- **Study completion:** Late 2026 (if funded)
+- **Results publication:** TBD
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/inbox/queue/2026-03-23-meta036-mechanism-b-implications-research-synthesis.md b/inbox/queue/2026-03-23-meta036-mechanism-b-implications-research-synthesis.md
index acb8611c9..3ac4782c8 100644
--- a/inbox/queue/2026-03-23-meta036-mechanism-b-implications-research-synthesis.md
+++ b/inbox/queue/2026-03-23-meta036-mechanism-b-implications-research-synthesis.md
@@ -7,9 +7,13 @@ date: 2026-03-21
 domain: internet-finance
 secondary_domains: [mechanisms, collective-intelligence]
 format: research-note
-status: unprocessed
+status: processed
 priority: high
 tags: [metadao, robin-hanson, futarchy, mechanism-b, information-aggregation, academic-research, gmu]
+processed_by: rio
+processed_date: 2026-03-25
+extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
+extraction_notes: "LLM returned 0 claims, 0 rejected by validator"
 ---
 
 ## Content
@@ -64,3 +68,14 @@ The META-036 study may produce the first empirical data on Mechanism A in futarc
 PRIMARY CONNECTION: [[speculative markets aggregate information through incentive and selection effects not wisdom of crowds]]
 WHY ARCHIVED: Research synthesis note identifying that META-036 creates a documented gap in the KB's Mechanism B evidence — the operative theoretical claim for Belief #1 has no experimental validation, and the first study to provide it is now funded (conditional on vote outcome)
 EXTRACTION HINT: The core extraction is NOT a claim but a belief update: the Session 9 claim candidate ("two separable epistemic mechanisms") should include a scope note that Mechanism B is theoretically grounded but experimentally unvalidated. META-036 is the first attempt to close this gap.
+
+
+## Key Facts
+- META-036 proposal requests $80,007 USDC for 6-month academic research
+- Robin Hanson is principal investigator, Daniel Houser is co-investigator
+- Study will involve 500 student participants at $50 each
+- Budget includes: Hanson summer salary ~$30K, GRA ~$19K, participant payments $25K, Houser co-PI ~$6K
+- Decision market reached 50% likelihood with $42.16K volume as of March 21, 2026
+- Proposal had ~2 days remaining as of March 21, 2026
+- Study is IRB-reviewed and follows standard experimental economics methodology
+- Research aims to produce 'first rigorous experimental evidence on information-aggregation efficiency of futarchy governance'