auto-fix: strip 11 broken wiki links
Some checks failed
Mirror PR to Forgejo / mirror (pull_request) Has been cancelled
Some checks failed
Mirror PR to Forgejo / mirror (pull_request) Has been cancelled
Pipeline auto-fixer: removed [[ ]] brackets from links that don't resolve to existing claims in the knowledge base.
This commit is contained in:
parent
776f172ffd
commit
2a68cfa72c
5 changed files with 11 additions and 11 deletions
|
|
@ -61,8 +61,8 @@ This positions Blue Origin in a direct orbital computing competition with:
|
|||
|
||||
**KB connections:**
|
||||
- China Three-Body program (see `2026-04-22-spacenews-agentic-ai-space-warfare-china-three-body.md`) — the operational program Project Sunrise is competing against
|
||||
- [[orbital debris is a classic commons tragedy]] — 51,600 new satellites in sun-synchronous orbits would significantly raise collision risk and Kessler cascade risk; governance of orbital computing megaconstellations is unaddressed
|
||||
- [[commercial space stations are the next infrastructure bet as ISS retirement creates a void]] — orbital datacenters represent an alternative commercial orbital infrastructure thesis alongside stations
|
||||
- orbital debris is a classic commons tragedy — 51,600 new satellites in sun-synchronous orbits would significantly raise collision risk and Kessler cascade risk; governance of orbital computing megaconstellations is unaddressed
|
||||
- commercial space stations are the next infrastructure bet as ISS retirement creates a void — orbital datacenters represent an alternative commercial orbital infrastructure thesis alongside stations
|
||||
- [[SpaceX vertical integration across launch broadband and manufacturing creates compounding cost advantages that no competitor can replicate piecemeal]] — Project Sunrise is Blue Origin's attempt to replicate this model: own the launch (New Glenn) + own the constellation (Sunrise) + own the compute
|
||||
|
||||
**Extraction hints:**
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -33,14 +33,14 @@ The Nuclear Regulatory Commission issued a 20-year operating license renewal for
|
|||
|
||||
**KB connections:**
|
||||
- [[AI compute demand is creating a terrestrial power crisis with 140 GW of new data center load against grid infrastructure already projected to fall 6 GW short by 2027]] — Diablo Canyon's renewal is partly driven by this demand, but the decision logic predates it
|
||||
- [[fusion contributing meaningfully to global electricity is a 2040s event at the earliest]] — Diablo Canyon operating to 2044+ means fission remains the reliable bridge technology longer than many expected
|
||||
- [[the energy transition's binding constraint is storage and grid integration, not generation]] — Diablo Canyon renewal is also evidence that firm baseload is valued alongside the storage-plus-renewables thesis
|
||||
- fusion contributing meaningfully to global electricity is a 2040s event at the earliest — Diablo Canyon operating to 2044+ means fission remains the reliable bridge technology longer than many expected
|
||||
- the energy transition's binding constraint is storage and grid integration, not generation — Diablo Canyon renewal is also evidence that firm baseload is valued alongside the storage-plus-renewables thesis
|
||||
|
||||
**Extraction hints:**
|
||||
- Claim candidate: "The nuclear fleet life extension wave (2022-2026) reveals that baseload economics and grid reliability drove pre-AI renaissance, with AI demand arriving as accelerant"
|
||||
- Claim candidate: "Diablo Canyon's NRC authorization to 2044-2045 demonstrates federal commitment to fission as a multi-decade bridge technology even as California politics limit near-term operations"
|
||||
|
||||
## Curator Notes
|
||||
PRIMARY CONNECTION: [[AI compute demand is creating a terrestrial power crisis with 140 GW of new data center load]]
|
||||
PRIMARY CONNECTION: AI compute demand is creating a terrestrial power crisis with 140 GW of new data center load
|
||||
WHY ARCHIVED: Milestone event in nuclear renaissance with dual significance — pre-AI decision logic + AI-era confirmation. Largest US nuclear plant gets 20-year federal extension.
|
||||
EXTRACTION HINT: Focus on the pre-AI vs. AI causation distinction. The decision to keep Diablo Canyon open was made in 2022 on energy security/reliability grounds; the 20-year NRC renewal in 2026 validates that decision. Separate the "why decided" (2022, pre-AI) from "why validated" (2026, partly AI demand context). Also flag: California legislative action needed for 2030-2044 operation — the political pathway is unfinished.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -72,9 +72,9 @@ Each signal adds another year to the path toward demonstrated lunar ISRU capabil
|
|||
|
||||
**KB connections:**
|
||||
- The 30-year space economy attractor state (cislunar ISRU propellant network) — ISRU prerequisites now 4+ years behind 2022 projections
|
||||
- [[space governance gaps are widening not narrowing]] — FAA investigation process being triggered twice in same vehicle program
|
||||
- [[China is the only credible peer competitor in space]] — China's Chang'e 7 proceeds while US ISRU chain accumulates delays
|
||||
- [[falling launch costs paradoxically both enable and threaten in-space resource utilization]] — launch cost isn't the issue for Blue Moon MK1; reliability is
|
||||
- space governance gaps are widening not narrowing — FAA investigation process being triggered twice in same vehicle program
|
||||
- China is the only credible peer competitor in space — China's Chang'e 7 proceeds while US ISRU chain accumulates delays
|
||||
- falling launch costs paradoxically both enable and threaten in-space resource utilization — launch cost isn't the issue for Blue Moon MK1; reliability is
|
||||
|
||||
**Extraction hints:**
|
||||
- Claim candidate: "New Glenn's BE-3U upper stage failure on two consecutive missions (NG-2 November 2025 and NG-3 April 2026) indicates a systematic rather than random engine reliability issue, blocking Blue Moon MK1 lunar landing and extending the ISRU prerequisite chain delay to 4+ years"
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ The causal structure is layered, not single-cause. "AI catalyzed" overstates AI'
|
|||
|
||||
**KB connections:**
|
||||
- [[knowledge embodiment lag means technology is available decades before organizations learn to use it optimally creating a productivity paradox]] — ARDP 2020 funded technology that AI companies didn't recognize as relevant until 2023-2024
|
||||
- [[AI compute demand is creating a terrestrial power crisis with 140 GW of new data center load]] — this is the Layer 3 demand driver
|
||||
- AI compute demand is creating a terrestrial power crisis with 140 GW of new data center load — this is the Layer 3 demand driver
|
||||
- [[attractor states provide gravitational reference points for capital allocation during structural industry change]] — the nuclear renaissance attractor was forming before AI; AI is pulling capital toward the same attractor faster
|
||||
|
||||
**Extraction hints:**
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -58,8 +58,8 @@ tags: [nuclear, CSP, molten-salt, nitrate-salt, thermal-storage, solar-nuclear-c
|
|||
**What I expected but didn't find:** I expected to find a formal cross-licensing agreement or joint R&D between CSP suppliers (SolarReserve, Sandia Labs) and nuclear companies. Found no evidence of formal licensing — the technology transfer appears informal/independent. Each company separately arrived at the same solution by recognizing the available industrial supply chain.
|
||||
|
||||
**KB connections:**
|
||||
- [[AI compute demand is creating a terrestrial power crisis]] — the same companies (TerraPower, Kairos) winning AI datacenter deals are those with CSP-heritage thermal storage
|
||||
- [[knowledge embodiment lag means technology is available decades before organizations learn to use it optimally]] — CSP developed nitrate salt tech in 2010s; nuclear is now adopting it in 2020s
|
||||
- AI compute demand is creating a terrestrial power crisis — the same companies (TerraPower, Kairos) winning AI datacenter deals are those with CSP-heritage thermal storage
|
||||
- knowledge embodiment lag means technology is available decades before organizations learn to use it optimally — CSP developed nitrate salt tech in 2010s; nuclear is now adopting it in 2020s
|
||||
- [[the atoms-to-bits spectrum positions industries between defensible-but-linear and scalable-but-commoditizable with the sweet spot where physical data generation feeds software that scales independently]] — thermal salt systems are pure atoms, but the data-generating opportunity is in reactor optimization that scales independently
|
||||
|
||||
**Extraction hints:**
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue