Merge pull request 'extract: 2026-03-18-scp-wiki-governance-mechanisms' (#1227) from extract/2026-03-18-scp-wiki-governance-mechanisms into main
Some checks are pending
Sync Graph Data to teleo-app / sync (push) Waiting to run
Some checks are pending
Sync Graph Data to teleo-app / sync (push) Waiting to run
This commit is contained in:
commit
2ae8a6805c
5 changed files with 66 additions and 1 deletions
|
|
@ -43,6 +43,12 @@ This advantage compounds with the scarcity economics documented in the media att
|
|||
|
||||
Fanfiction communities demonstrate that provenance verification is not just about authenticity but about community participation: members evaluate through 'evidence of author engagement with source material' and value the craft-development journey. 68.6% expressed ethical concerns about unauthorized scraping of fan works for AI training, viewing it as appropriation of unpaid creative labor within gift-economy communities. This extends the provenance advantage: community-owned IP has both inherent provenance AND community investment in protecting that provenance.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Additional Evidence (confirm)
|
||||
*Source: [[2026-03-18-scp-wiki-governance-mechanisms]] | Added: 2026-03-18*
|
||||
|
||||
SCP Foundation enforces human-only authorship through permanent bans for AI-generated content while maintaining fully open IP (Creative Commons). This demonstrates that open IP + human-made premium can coexist as a coherent strategy—the community chose to keep IP open while restricting production methods to preserve authenticity.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Relevant Notes:
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -41,6 +41,12 @@ Deloitte 2024 Connected Consumer Survey found nearly 70% of respondents are conc
|
|||
|
||||
Fanfiction community data shows rejection is VALUES-based not quality-based: 92% agree 'fanfiction is a space for human creativity' and 86% insist on AI disclosure. 58% feel 'deceived' by undisclosed AI usage. The authenticity signal (human authorship) is the primary quality criterion, making technical improvements irrelevant to acceptance.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Additional Evidence (confirm)
|
||||
*Source: [[2026-03-18-scp-wiki-governance-mechanisms]] | Added: 2026-03-18*
|
||||
|
||||
SCP Foundation—the most successful open-IP collaborative fiction project with 9,800+ objects—permanently bans AI-generated text or images in user-facing content. This is a deliberate policy choice by a community that explicitly values open IP and collaborative creation, suggesting the AI ban is about preserving human authorship as a core value, not protecting commercial interests.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Relevant Notes:
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -23,6 +23,12 @@ The IP-as-platform model also illuminates why since [[information cascades creat
|
|||
|
||||
Claynosaurz production model treats IP as multi-sided platform by: (1) sharing storyboards and scripts with community during production (enabling creative input), (2) featuring community members' owned collectibles within episodes (enabling asset integration), and (3) explicitly framing approach as 'collaborate with emerging talent from the creator economy and develop original transmedia projects that expand the Claynosaurz universe beyond the screen.' This implements the platform model within a professional co-production with Mediawan, demonstrating that multi-sided platform approach is viable at scale with traditional studio partners, not just independent creator context.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Additional Evidence (extend)
|
||||
*Source: [[2026-03-18-scp-wiki-governance-mechanisms]] | Added: 2026-03-18*
|
||||
|
||||
SCP Foundation's four-layer quality governance (greenlight peer review → community voting → staff deletion → emergency bypass) provides a concrete implementation model for how multi-sided IP platforms maintain quality at scale. The system processed 2,076 new pages in 2025 with average +41 votes per article, demonstrating the architecture works for high-volume collaborative production.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Relevant Notes:
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
|
|||
{
|
||||
"rejected_claims": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "collaborative-fiction-quality-control-uses-four-layer-governance-with-pre-publication-peer-review-community-voting-staff-deletion-and-emergency-bypass.md",
|
||||
"issues": [
|
||||
"missing_attribution_extractor"
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "narrative-coherence-in-collaborative-fiction-emerges-from-community-practice-not-canonical-enforcement-when-no-governance-layer-controls-continuity.md",
|
||||
"issues": [
|
||||
"missing_attribution_extractor"
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"validation_stats": {
|
||||
"total": 2,
|
||||
"kept": 0,
|
||||
"fixed": 2,
|
||||
"rejected": 2,
|
||||
"fixes_applied": [
|
||||
"collaborative-fiction-quality-control-uses-four-layer-governance-with-pre-publication-peer-review-community-voting-staff-deletion-and-emergency-bypass.md:set_created:2026-03-18",
|
||||
"narrative-coherence-in-collaborative-fiction-emerges-from-community-practice-not-canonical-enforcement-when-no-governance-layer-controls-continuity.md:set_created:2026-03-18"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"rejections": [
|
||||
"collaborative-fiction-quality-control-uses-four-layer-governance-with-pre-publication-peer-review-community-voting-staff-deletion-and-emergency-bypass.md:missing_attribution_extractor",
|
||||
"narrative-coherence-in-collaborative-fiction-emerges-from-community-practice-not-canonical-enforcement-when-no-governance-layer-controls-continuity.md:missing_attribution_extractor"
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5",
|
||||
"date": "2026-03-18"
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -7,10 +7,14 @@ date: 2026-03-18
|
|||
domain: entertainment
|
||||
secondary_domains: [collective-intelligence]
|
||||
format: essay
|
||||
status: unprocessed
|
||||
status: enrichment
|
||||
priority: high
|
||||
triage_tag: entity
|
||||
tags: [scp-foundation, governance, quality-control, peer-review, deletion, greenlight, collaborative-fiction]
|
||||
processed_by: clay
|
||||
processed_date: 2026-03-18
|
||||
enrichments_applied: ["consumer-acceptance-of-ai-creative-content-declining-despite-quality-improvements-because-authenticity-signal-becomes-more-valuable.md", "community-owned-IP-has-structural-advantage-in-human-made-premium-because-provenance-is-inherent-and-legible.md", "entertainment IP should be treated as a multi-sided platform that enables fan creation rather than a unidirectional broadcast asset.md"]
|
||||
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Content
|
||||
|
|
@ -65,3 +69,14 @@ Comprehensive documentation of SCP Foundation's multi-layered quality governance
|
|||
## Curator Notes
|
||||
PRIMARY CONNECTION: community IP governance mechanisms (Session 5-6 research thread)
|
||||
WHY ARCHIVED: Primary source documentation of the most successful collaborative fiction governance system. Provides verifiable mechanism details that theory articles lack.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Facts
|
||||
- SCP Foundation has 9,800+ SCP objects and 6,300+ tales as of late 2025
|
||||
- SCP Foundation uploaded 2,076 pages in 2025 with +84,329 cumulative votes, averaging +41 votes per article
|
||||
- SCP Foundation has 70 new author pages in 2025
|
||||
- SCP Foundation operates 16 international language branches
|
||||
- SCP Foundation uses Creative Commons BY-SA 3.0 license for all content
|
||||
- Greenlight reviewers must meet criteria: Butterfly Squad Roster, Moth Squad, 3+ successful pages, or featured in Reviewers' Spotlight
|
||||
- SCP deletion process: -10 rating triggers 24-hour timer + 3 staff votes; -20 rating enables immediate deletion with 3 staff votes
|
||||
- SCP Foundation permanently bans users for AI-generated content, plagiarism, or vandalism
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue