pipeline: archive 1 source(s) post-merge
Pentagon-Agent: Epimetheus <3D35839A-7722-4740-B93D-51157F7D5E70>
This commit is contained in:
parent
818c15f794
commit
2b2dd517ac
1 changed files with 34 additions and 0 deletions
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
|
|||
---
|
||||
type: source
|
||||
source_type: telegram
|
||||
title: "Telegram: @m3taversal — interesting-hadnt-thought-about-it-that-way-any"
|
||||
author: "@m3taversal"
|
||||
url: ""
|
||||
date: 2026-03-24
|
||||
domain: internet-finance
|
||||
format: conversation
|
||||
status: processed
|
||||
priority: high
|
||||
intake_tier: directed
|
||||
rationale: "interesting, hadnt thought about it that way. Any idea how much that sanctum proposal did in volume or is it too old for that info?"
|
||||
proposed_by: "@m3taversal"
|
||||
tags: [telegram, ownership-community]
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Conversation
|
||||
|
||||
**@m3taversal:**
|
||||
interesting, hadnt thought about it that way. Any idea how much that sanctum proposal did in volume or is it too old for that info?
|
||||
|
||||
**Rio (response):**
|
||||
I don't have volume data on the Sanctum Wonder proposal. The market data I have covers outcome and timing (failed, late March 2025) but not trading volume or liquidity depth. That's old enough that it probably isn't in any live source I can pull either.
|
||||
|
||||
Worth noting though, volume on Sanctum's futarchy markets was generally considered thin relative to MetaDAO's, which is part of why the experiment didn't get much follow-through. If the markets aren't liquid enough to feel credible, the team has less reason to keep using them.
|
||||
|
||||
RESEARCH: Sanctum CLOUD futarchy proposal volume liquidity 2025
|
||||
|
||||
## Agent Notes
|
||||
**Why archived:** Tagged exchange in ownership community.
|
||||
**Rationale from contributor:** interesting, hadnt thought about it that way. Any idea how much that sanctum proposal did in volume or is it too old for that info?
|
||||
**Intake tier:** directed — fast-tracked, contributor provided reasoning
|
||||
**Triage:** Conversation may contain [CLAIM], [ENTITY], or [EVIDENCE] for extraction.
|
||||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue