substantive-fix: address reviewer feedback (frontmatter_schema)
Some checks failed
Mirror PR to Forgejo / mirror (pull_request) Has been cancelled
Some checks failed
Mirror PR to Forgejo / mirror (pull_request) Has been cancelled
This commit is contained in:
parent
de25626f2b
commit
30c2d5f562
1 changed files with 6 additions and 1 deletions
|
|
@ -1,4 +1,9 @@
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
"action": "flag_duplicate",
|
"action": "flag_duplicate",
|
||||||
"candidates": [
|
"candidates": [
|
||||||
"glp-1-receptor-agonists-produce-nutritional-deficiencies-in-12-
|
"glp-1-receptor-agonists-produce-nutritional-deficiencies-in-12-14-percent-of-users-within-6-12-months-requiring-monitoring-infrastructure-current-prescribing-lacks.md",
|
||||||
|
"glp-1-therapy-requires-nutritional-monitoring-infrastructure-but-92-percent-receive-no-dietitian-support.md",
|
||||||
|
"glp1-hfpef-creates-competing-mechanisms-cardiac-benefit-versus-sarcopenic-malnutrition-risk.md"
|
||||||
|
],
|
||||||
|
"reasoning": "The original claim was a semantic duplicate of two existing claims already in the KB, attempting to merge their content without retiring the originals. The new claim restated essentially the same evidence (deficiency rates, iron/calcium/protein intake figures, 92% no dietitian support, dual mechanism, food insecurity compounding). The reviewer feedback consistently highlighted this as a critical issue, recommending enrichment of existing claims rather than creation of a new, overlapping one. The third candidate is related as it discusses the sarcopenic malnutrition risk, which is a direct consequence of the nutritional deficiencies discussed."
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue