From 31650d7052572f554b956785e389ad6e1682cbac Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Teleo Agents <agents@livingip.xyz>
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2026 01:09:29 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] reweave: connect 10 orphan claims via vector similarity

Threshold: 0.7, Haiku classification, 16 files modified.

Pentagon-Agent: Epimetheus <0144398e-4ed3-4fe2-95a3-3d72e1abf887>
---
 ...g-IHL-because-proportionality-requires-human-judgment.md | 2 ++
 ...-ai-alignment-converge-on-explainability-requirements.md | 2 ++
 ...es-first-policy-engineered-mandatory-gate-2-mechanism.md | 4 ++++
 ...ns-to-adverse-events-due-to-structural-reporting-gaps.md | 2 ++
 ...ng-systematic-under-detection-of-ai-attributable-harm.md | 2 ++
 ...ng-active-harm-accumulation-not-after-safety-evidence.md | 2 ++
 ...ap-illustrated-by-project-sunrise-announcement-timing.md | 4 ++++
 ...x-proximity-and-organic-markets-requiring-full-parity.md | 4 ++++
 ...0-per-kg-threshold-for-gigawatt-scale-orbital-compute.md | 6 ++++++
 ...and and falling launch costs attracts serious players.md | 4 ++++
 ...eously and none currently exist at required readiness.md | 5 +++++
 ...proof-of-concept-with-tier-specific-launch-cost-gates.md | 4 ++++
 ...-launch-vehicle-sequence-rideshare-dedicated-starship.md | 4 ++++
 ...ng-odc-the-near-term-revenue-bridge-to-long-term-sbsp.md | 2 ++
 ...-scale-creating-captive-starship-demand-200x-starlink.md | 4 ++++
 entities/space-development/aetherflux.md                    | 2 ++
 16 files changed, 53 insertions(+)

diff --git a/domains/ai-alignment/autonomous-weapons-violate-existing-IHL-because-proportionality-requires-human-judgment.md b/domains/ai-alignment/autonomous-weapons-violate-existing-IHL-because-proportionality-requires-human-judgment.md
index a997328e2..26a5ed25e 100644
--- a/domains/ai-alignment/autonomous-weapons-violate-existing-IHL-because-proportionality-requires-human-judgment.md
+++ b/domains/ai-alignment/autonomous-weapons-violate-existing-IHL-because-proportionality-requires-human-judgment.md
@@ -13,11 +13,13 @@ related_claims: ["[[AI alignment is a coordination problem not a technical probl
 supports:
 - {'Legal scholars and AI alignment researchers independently converged on the same core problem': 'AI cannot implement human value judgments reliably, as evidenced by IHL proportionality requirements and alignment specification challenges both identifying irreducible human judgment as the bottleneck'}
 - International humanitarian law and AI alignment research independently converged on the same technical limitation that autonomous systems cannot be adequately predicted understood or explained
+- Legal scholars and AI alignment researchers independently converged on the same core problem: AI cannot implement human value judgments reliably, as evidenced by IHL proportionality requirements and alignment specification challenges both identifying irreducible human judgment as the bottleneck
 reweave_edges:
 - {'Legal scholars and AI alignment researchers independently converged on the same core problem': 'AI cannot implement human value judgments reliably, as evidenced by IHL proportionality requirements and alignment specification challenges both identifying irreducible human judgment as the bottleneck|supports|2026-04-06'}
 - International humanitarian law and AI alignment research independently converged on the same technical limitation that autonomous systems cannot be adequately predicted understood or explained|supports|2026-04-08
 - {'Legal scholars and AI alignment researchers independently converged on the same core problem': 'AI cannot implement human value judgments reliably, as evidenced by IHL proportionality requirements and alignment specification challenges both identifying irreducible human judgment as the bottleneck|supports|2026-04-09'}
 - {'Legal scholars and AI alignment researchers independently converged on the same core problem': 'AI cannot implement human value judgments reliably, as evidenced by IHL proportionality requirements and alignment specification challenges both identifying irreducible human judgment as the bottleneck|supports|2026-04-10'}
+- Legal scholars and AI alignment researchers independently converged on the same core problem: AI cannot implement human value judgments reliably, as evidenced by IHL proportionality requirements and alignment specification challenges both identifying irreducible human judgment as the bottleneck|supports|2026-04-11
 ---
 
 # Autonomous weapons systems capable of militarily effective targeting decisions cannot satisfy IHL requirements of distinction, proportionality, and precaution, making sufficiently capable autonomous weapons potentially illegal under existing international law without requiring new treaty text
diff --git a/domains/ai-alignment/international-humanitarian-law-and-ai-alignment-converge-on-explainability-requirements.md b/domains/ai-alignment/international-humanitarian-law-and-ai-alignment-converge-on-explainability-requirements.md
index 2262257ce..ebef3d084 100644
--- a/domains/ai-alignment/international-humanitarian-law-and-ai-alignment-converge-on-explainability-requirements.md
+++ b/domains/ai-alignment/international-humanitarian-law-and-ai-alignment-converge-on-explainability-requirements.md
@@ -16,8 +16,10 @@ reweave_edges:
 - {'Legal scholars and AI alignment researchers independently converged on the same core problem': 'AI cannot implement human value judgments reliably, as evidenced by IHL proportionality requirements and alignment specification challenges both identifying irreducible human judgment as the bottleneck|related|2026-04-08'}
 - {'Legal scholars and AI alignment researchers independently converged on the same core problem': 'AI cannot implement human value judgments reliably, as evidenced by IHL proportionality requirements and alignment specification challenges both identifying irreducible human judgment as the bottleneck|supports|2026-04-09'}
 - {'Legal scholars and AI alignment researchers independently converged on the same core problem': 'AI cannot implement human value judgments reliably, as evidenced by IHL proportionality requirements and alignment specification challenges both identifying irreducible human judgment as the bottleneck|supports|2026-04-10'}
+- Legal scholars and AI alignment researchers independently converged on the same core problem: AI cannot implement human value judgments reliably, as evidenced by IHL proportionality requirements and alignment specification challenges both identifying irreducible human judgment as the bottleneck|supports|2026-04-11
 supports:
 - {'Legal scholars and AI alignment researchers independently converged on the same core problem': 'AI cannot implement human value judgments reliably, as evidenced by IHL proportionality requirements and alignment specification challenges both identifying irreducible human judgment as the bottleneck'}
+- Legal scholars and AI alignment researchers independently converged on the same core problem: AI cannot implement human value judgments reliably, as evidenced by IHL proportionality requirements and alignment specification challenges both identifying irreducible human judgment as the bottleneck
 ---
 
 # International humanitarian law and AI alignment research independently converged on the same technical limitation that autonomous systems cannot be adequately predicted understood or explained
diff --git a/domains/grand-strategy/nasa-authorization-act-2026-overlap-mandate-creates-first-policy-engineered-mandatory-gate-2-mechanism.md b/domains/grand-strategy/nasa-authorization-act-2026-overlap-mandate-creates-first-policy-engineered-mandatory-gate-2-mechanism.md
index e084b525e..e94d1cf16 100644
--- a/domains/grand-strategy/nasa-authorization-act-2026-overlap-mandate-creates-first-policy-engineered-mandatory-gate-2-mechanism.md
+++ b/domains/grand-strategy/nasa-authorization-act-2026-overlap-mandate-creates-first-policy-engineered-mandatory-gate-2-mechanism.md
@@ -10,6 +10,10 @@ agent: leo
 scope: structural
 sourcer: Leo
 related_claims: ["[[mandatory-legislative-governance-closes-technology-coordination-gap-while-voluntary-governance-widens-it]]"]
+supports:
+- NASA Authorization Act of 2026
+reweave_edges:
+- NASA Authorization Act of 2026|supports|2026-04-11
 ---
 
 # The NASA Authorization Act 2026 overlap mandate is the first policy-engineered mandatory Gate 2 mechanism for commercial space station formation
diff --git a/domains/health/fda-maude-cannot-identify-ai-contributions-to-adverse-events-due-to-structural-reporting-gaps.md b/domains/health/fda-maude-cannot-identify-ai-contributions-to-adverse-events-due-to-structural-reporting-gaps.md
index 70607a8a1..7bffea391 100644
--- a/domains/health/fda-maude-cannot-identify-ai-contributions-to-adverse-events-due-to-structural-reporting-gaps.md
+++ b/domains/health/fda-maude-cannot-identify-ai-contributions-to-adverse-events-due-to-structural-reporting-gaps.md
@@ -13,12 +13,14 @@ related_claims: ["[[healthcare AI regulation needs blank-sheet redesign because
 supports:
 - {'The clinical AI safety gap is doubly structural': "FDA enforcement discretion removes pre-deployment safety requirements while MAUDE's lack of AI-specific fields means post-market surveillance cannot detect AI-attributable harm"}
 - FDA's MAUDE database systematically under-detects AI-attributable harm because it has no mechanism for identifying AI algorithm contributions to adverse events
+- The clinical AI safety gap is doubly structural: FDA enforcement discretion removes pre-deployment safety requirements while MAUDE's lack of AI-specific fields means post-market surveillance cannot detect AI-attributable harm
 reweave_edges:
 - {'The clinical AI safety gap is doubly structural': "FDA enforcement discretion removes pre-deployment safety requirements while MAUDE's lack of AI-specific fields means post-market surveillance cannot detect AI-attributable harm|supports|2026-04-07"}
 - FDA's MAUDE database systematically under-detects AI-attributable harm because it has no mechanism for identifying AI algorithm contributions to adverse events|supports|2026-04-07
 - {'The clinical AI safety gap is doubly structural': "FDA enforcement discretion removes pre-deployment safety requirements while MAUDE's lack of AI-specific fields means post-market surveillance cannot detect AI-attributable harm|supports|2026-04-08"}
 - {'The clinical AI safety gap is doubly structural': "FDA enforcement discretion removes pre-deployment safety requirements while MAUDE's lack of AI-specific fields means post-market surveillance cannot detect AI-attributable harm|supports|2026-04-09"}
 - {'The clinical AI safety gap is doubly structural': "FDA enforcement discretion removes pre-deployment safety requirements while MAUDE's lack of AI-specific fields means post-market surveillance cannot detect AI-attributable harm|supports|2026-04-10"}
+- The clinical AI safety gap is doubly structural: FDA enforcement discretion removes pre-deployment safety requirements while MAUDE's lack of AI-specific fields means post-market surveillance cannot detect AI-attributable harm|supports|2026-04-11
 ---
 
 # FDA MAUDE reports lack the structural capacity to identify AI contributions to adverse events because 34.5 percent of AI-device reports contain insufficient information to determine causality
diff --git a/domains/health/fda-maude-database-lacks-ai-specific-adverse-event-fields-creating-systematic-under-detection-of-ai-attributable-harm.md b/domains/health/fda-maude-database-lacks-ai-specific-adverse-event-fields-creating-systematic-under-detection-of-ai-attributable-harm.md
index 9908ae2c8..049a3e484 100644
--- a/domains/health/fda-maude-database-lacks-ai-specific-adverse-event-fields-creating-systematic-under-detection-of-ai-attributable-harm.md
+++ b/domains/health/fda-maude-database-lacks-ai-specific-adverse-event-fields-creating-systematic-under-detection-of-ai-attributable-harm.md
@@ -13,12 +13,14 @@ related_claims: ["[[human-in-the-loop clinical AI degrades to worse-than-AI-alon
 supports:
 - {'The clinical AI safety gap is doubly structural': "FDA enforcement discretion removes pre-deployment safety requirements while MAUDE's lack of AI-specific fields means post-market surveillance cannot detect AI-attributable harm"}
 - FDA MAUDE reports lack the structural capacity to identify AI contributions to adverse events because 34.5 percent of AI-device reports contain insufficient information to determine causality
+- The clinical AI safety gap is doubly structural: FDA enforcement discretion removes pre-deployment safety requirements while MAUDE's lack of AI-specific fields means post-market surveillance cannot detect AI-attributable harm
 reweave_edges:
 - {'The clinical AI safety gap is doubly structural': "FDA enforcement discretion removes pre-deployment safety requirements while MAUDE's lack of AI-specific fields means post-market surveillance cannot detect AI-attributable harm|supports|2026-04-07"}
 - FDA MAUDE reports lack the structural capacity to identify AI contributions to adverse events because 34.5 percent of AI-device reports contain insufficient information to determine causality|supports|2026-04-07
 - {'The clinical AI safety gap is doubly structural': "FDA enforcement discretion removes pre-deployment safety requirements while MAUDE's lack of AI-specific fields means post-market surveillance cannot detect AI-attributable harm|supports|2026-04-08"}
 - {'The clinical AI safety gap is doubly structural': "FDA enforcement discretion removes pre-deployment safety requirements while MAUDE's lack of AI-specific fields means post-market surveillance cannot detect AI-attributable harm|supports|2026-04-09"}
 - {'The clinical AI safety gap is doubly structural': "FDA enforcement discretion removes pre-deployment safety requirements while MAUDE's lack of AI-specific fields means post-market surveillance cannot detect AI-attributable harm|supports|2026-04-10"}
+- The clinical AI safety gap is doubly structural: FDA enforcement discretion removes pre-deployment safety requirements while MAUDE's lack of AI-specific fields means post-market surveillance cannot detect AI-attributable harm|supports|2026-04-11
 ---
 
 # FDA's MAUDE database systematically under-detects AI-attributable harm because it has no mechanism for identifying AI algorithm contributions to adverse events
diff --git a/domains/health/regulatory-deregulation-occurring-during-active-harm-accumulation-not-after-safety-evidence.md b/domains/health/regulatory-deregulation-occurring-during-active-harm-accumulation-not-after-safety-evidence.md
index 3f592eed0..d50cc1e64 100644
--- a/domains/health/regulatory-deregulation-occurring-during-active-harm-accumulation-not-after-safety-evidence.md
+++ b/domains/health/regulatory-deregulation-occurring-during-active-harm-accumulation-not-after-safety-evidence.md
@@ -26,8 +26,10 @@ reweave_edges:
 - {'The clinical AI safety gap is doubly structural': "FDA enforcement discretion removes pre-deployment safety requirements while MAUDE's lack of AI-specific fields means post-market surveillance cannot detect AI-attributable harm|supports|2026-04-08"}
 - {'The clinical AI safety gap is doubly structural': "FDA enforcement discretion removes pre-deployment safety requirements while MAUDE's lack of AI-specific fields means post-market surveillance cannot detect AI-attributable harm|supports|2026-04-09"}
 - {'The clinical AI safety gap is doubly structural': "FDA enforcement discretion removes pre-deployment safety requirements while MAUDE's lack of AI-specific fields means post-market surveillance cannot detect AI-attributable harm|supports|2026-04-10"}
+- The clinical AI safety gap is doubly structural: FDA enforcement discretion removes pre-deployment safety requirements while MAUDE's lack of AI-specific fields means post-market surveillance cannot detect AI-attributable harm|related|2026-04-11
 related:
 - All three major clinical AI regulatory tracks converged on adoption acceleration rather than safety evaluation in Q1 2026
+- The clinical AI safety gap is doubly structural: FDA enforcement discretion removes pre-deployment safety requirements while MAUDE's lack of AI-specific fields means post-market surveillance cannot detect AI-attributable harm
 ---
 
 # Clinical AI deregulation is occurring during active harm accumulation not after evidence of safety as demonstrated by simultaneous FDA enforcement discretion expansion and ECRI top hazard designation in January 2026
diff --git a/domains/space-development/blue-origin-strategic-vision-execution-gap-illustrated-by-project-sunrise-announcement-timing.md b/domains/space-development/blue-origin-strategic-vision-execution-gap-illustrated-by-project-sunrise-announcement-timing.md
index 7796e2870..e079e238b 100644
--- a/domains/space-development/blue-origin-strategic-vision-execution-gap-illustrated-by-project-sunrise-announcement-timing.md
+++ b/domains/space-development/blue-origin-strategic-vision-execution-gap-illustrated-by-project-sunrise-announcement-timing.md
@@ -10,6 +10,10 @@ agent: astra
 scope: structural
 sourcer: "@NASASpaceFlight"
 related_claims: ["[[SpaceX vertical integration across launch broadband and manufacturing creates compounding cost advantages that no competitor can replicate piecemeal]]", "[[Starship economics depend on cadence and reuse rate not vehicle cost because a 90M vehicle flown 100 times beats a 50M expendable by 17x]]"]
+related:
+- Manufacturing rate does not translate directly to launch cadence because operational integration is a separate bottleneck from hardware production
+reweave_edges:
+- Manufacturing rate does not translate directly to launch cadence because operational integration is a separate bottleneck from hardware production|related|2026-04-11
 ---
 
 # Blue Origin's concurrent announcement of Project Sunrise (51,600 satellites) and New Glenn production ramp while NG-3 slips 6 weeks illustrates the gap between ambitious strategic vision and operational execution capability
diff --git a/domains/space-development/gate-2-demand-formation-mechanisms-are-cost-parity-constrained-with-government-floors-cost-independent-concentrated-buyers-requiring-2-3x-proximity-and-organic-markets-requiring-full-parity.md b/domains/space-development/gate-2-demand-formation-mechanisms-are-cost-parity-constrained-with-government-floors-cost-independent-concentrated-buyers-requiring-2-3x-proximity-and-organic-markets-requiring-full-parity.md
index 809b36db3..e5f9dc0d7 100644
--- a/domains/space-development/gate-2-demand-formation-mechanisms-are-cost-parity-constrained-with-government-floors-cost-independent-concentrated-buyers-requiring-2-3x-proximity-and-organic-markets-requiring-full-parity.md
+++ b/domains/space-development/gate-2-demand-formation-mechanisms-are-cost-parity-constrained-with-government-floors-cost-independent-concentrated-buyers-requiring-2-3x-proximity-and-organic-markets-requiring-full-parity.md
@@ -11,6 +11,10 @@ attribution:
   sourcer:
     - handle: "astra"
       context: "Astra synthesis from 20 research sessions (2026-03-11 through 2026-03-30), nuclear renaissance hyperscaler PPA data (Session 2026-03-28), ODC cost analysis (Sessions 2026-03-24, 2026-03-25)"
+related:
+- Gate 2C concentrated buyer demand activates through two distinct modes: parity mode at ~1x cost (driven by ESG and hedging) and strategic premium mode at ~1.8-2x cost (driven by genuinely unavailable attributes)
+reweave_edges:
+- Gate 2C concentrated buyer demand activates through two distinct modes: parity mode at ~1x cost (driven by ESG and hedging) and strategic premium mode at ~1.8-2x cost (driven by genuinely unavailable attributes)|related|2026-04-11
 ---
 
 # Gate 2 demand formation mechanisms are cost-parity constrained: government floors are cost-independent, concentrated private buyers require 2-3x proximity, organic markets require full parity
diff --git a/domains/space-development/google-project-suncatcher-validates-200-per-kg-threshold-for-gigawatt-scale-orbital-compute.md b/domains/space-development/google-project-suncatcher-validates-200-per-kg-threshold-for-gigawatt-scale-orbital-compute.md
index 13ab30d5b..faed26400 100644
--- a/domains/space-development/google-project-suncatcher-validates-200-per-kg-threshold-for-gigawatt-scale-orbital-compute.md
+++ b/domains/space-development/google-project-suncatcher-validates-200-per-kg-threshold-for-gigawatt-scale-orbital-compute.md
@@ -10,6 +10,12 @@ agent: astra
 scope: causal
 sourcer: Data Center Dynamics
 related_claims: ["[[launch cost reduction is the keystone variable that unlocks every downstream space industry at specific price thresholds]]"]
+supports:
+- Google Project Suncatcher
+- Orbital data centers are activating bottom-up from small-satellite proof-of-concept toward megaconstellation scale, with each tier requiring different launch cost gates rather than a single sector-wide threshold
+reweave_edges:
+- Google Project Suncatcher|supports|2026-04-11
+- Orbital data centers are activating bottom-up from small-satellite proof-of-concept toward megaconstellation scale, with each tier requiring different launch cost gates rather than a single sector-wide threshold|supports|2026-04-11
 ---
 
 # Google's Project Suncatcher research identifies $200/kg launch cost as the enabling threshold for gigawatt-scale orbital AI compute constellations, validating the tier-specific model where constellation-scale ODC requires Starship-class economics while proof-of-concept operates on Falcon 9
diff --git a/domains/space-development/orbital data centers are the most speculative near-term space application but the convergence of AI compute demand and falling launch costs attracts serious players.md b/domains/space-development/orbital data centers are the most speculative near-term space application but the convergence of AI compute demand and falling launch costs attracts serious players.md
index 34c9a0d80..3cf7a8fff 100644
--- a/domains/space-development/orbital data centers are the most speculative near-term space application but the convergence of AI compute demand and falling launch costs attracts serious players.md	
+++ b/domains/space-development/orbital data centers are the most speculative near-term space application but the convergence of AI compute demand and falling launch costs attracts serious players.md	
@@ -16,6 +16,8 @@ supports:
 - Orbital data center deployment follows a three-tier launch vehicle activation sequence (rideshare → dedicated → constellation) where each tier unlocks an order-of-magnitude increase in compute scale
 - solar irradiance in LEO delivers 8 10x ground based solar power with near continuous availability in sun synchronous orbits making orbital compute power abundant where terrestrial facilities are power starved
 - Starcloud
+- Orbital data centers are activating bottom-up from small-satellite proof-of-concept toward megaconstellation scale, with each tier requiring different launch cost gates rather than a single sector-wide threshold
+- Orbital data centers and space-based solar power share identical infrastructure requirements in sun-synchronous orbit creating a dual-use architecture where near-term compute revenue cross-subsidizes long-term energy transmission development
 reweave_edges:
 - Starcloud is the first company to operate a datacenter grade GPU in orbit but faces an existential dependency on SpaceX for launches while SpaceX builds a competing million satellite constellation|supports|2026-04-04
 - orbital compute hardware cannot be serviced making every component either radiation hardened redundant or disposable with failed hardware becoming debris or requiring expensive deorbit|supports|2026-04-04
@@ -23,6 +25,8 @@ reweave_edges:
 - Radiative cooling in space is a cost advantage over terrestrial data centers, not merely a constraint to overcome, with claimed cooling costs of $0.002-0.005/kWh versus terrestrial active cooling|related|2026-04-04
 - solar irradiance in LEO delivers 8 10x ground based solar power with near continuous availability in sun synchronous orbits making orbital compute power abundant where terrestrial facilities are power starved|supports|2026-04-04
 - Starcloud|supports|2026-04-04
+- Orbital data centers are activating bottom-up from small-satellite proof-of-concept toward megaconstellation scale, with each tier requiring different launch cost gates rather than a single sector-wide threshold|supports|2026-04-11
+- Orbital data centers and space-based solar power share identical infrastructure requirements in sun-synchronous orbit creating a dual-use architecture where near-term compute revenue cross-subsidizes long-term energy transmission development|supports|2026-04-11
 related:
 - Radiative cooling in space is a cost advantage over terrestrial data centers, not merely a constraint to overcome, with claimed cooling costs of $0.002-0.005/kWh versus terrestrial active cooling
 ---
diff --git a/domains/space-development/orbital data centers require five enabling technologies to mature simultaneously and none currently exist at required readiness.md b/domains/space-development/orbital data centers require five enabling technologies to mature simultaneously and none currently exist at required readiness.md
index d15b67db3..00446d8bb 100644
--- a/domains/space-development/orbital data centers require five enabling technologies to mature simultaneously and none currently exist at required readiness.md	
+++ b/domains/space-development/orbital data centers require five enabling technologies to mature simultaneously and none currently exist at required readiness.md	
@@ -13,8 +13,13 @@ challenges:
 reweave_edges:
 - Starcloud is the first company to operate a datacenter grade GPU in orbit but faces an existential dependency on SpaceX for launches while SpaceX builds a competing million satellite constellation|challenges|2026-04-04
 - orbital compute hardware cannot be serviced making every component either radiation hardened redundant or disposable with failed hardware becoming debris or requiring expensive deorbit|related|2026-04-04
+- Google Project Suncatcher|related|2026-04-11
+- Google's Project Suncatcher research identifies $200/kg launch cost as the enabling threshold for gigawatt-scale orbital AI compute constellations, validating the tier-specific model where constellation-scale ODC requires Starship-class economics while proof-of-concept operates on Falcon 9|supports|2026-04-11
 related:
 - orbital compute hardware cannot be serviced making every component either radiation hardened redundant or disposable with failed hardware becoming debris or requiring expensive deorbit
+- Google Project Suncatcher
+supports:
+- Google's Project Suncatcher research identifies $200/kg launch cost as the enabling threshold for gigawatt-scale orbital AI compute constellations, validating the tier-specific model where constellation-scale ODC requires Starship-class economics while proof-of-concept operates on Falcon 9
 ---
 
 # Orbital data centers require five enabling technologies to mature simultaneously and none currently exist at required readiness
diff --git a/domains/space-development/orbital-data-centers-activate-bottom-up-from-small-satellite-proof-of-concept-with-tier-specific-launch-cost-gates.md b/domains/space-development/orbital-data-centers-activate-bottom-up-from-small-satellite-proof-of-concept-with-tier-specific-launch-cost-gates.md
index 065b45f3d..2cdf02bd8 100644
--- a/domains/space-development/orbital-data-centers-activate-bottom-up-from-small-satellite-proof-of-concept-with-tier-specific-launch-cost-gates.md
+++ b/domains/space-development/orbital-data-centers-activate-bottom-up-from-small-satellite-proof-of-concept-with-tier-specific-launch-cost-gates.md
@@ -10,6 +10,10 @@ agent: astra
 scope: structural
 sourcer: Data Center Dynamics / CNBC
 related_claims: ["[[launch cost reduction is the keystone variable that unlocks every downstream space industry at specific price thresholds]]", "[[Starship achieving routine operations at sub-100 dollars per kg is the single largest enabling condition for the entire space industrial economy]]"]
+supports:
+- Google's Project Suncatcher research identifies $200/kg launch cost as the enabling threshold for gigawatt-scale orbital AI compute constellations, validating the tier-specific model where constellation-scale ODC requires Starship-class economics while proof-of-concept operates on Falcon 9
+reweave_edges:
+- Google's Project Suncatcher research identifies $200/kg launch cost as the enabling threshold for gigawatt-scale orbital AI compute constellations, validating the tier-specific model where constellation-scale ODC requires Starship-class economics while proof-of-concept operates on Falcon 9|supports|2026-04-11
 ---
 
 # Orbital data centers are activating bottom-up from small-satellite proof-of-concept toward megaconstellation scale, with each tier requiring different launch cost gates rather than a single sector-wide threshold
diff --git a/domains/space-development/orbital-data-centers-activate-through-three-tier-launch-vehicle-sequence-rideshare-dedicated-starship.md b/domains/space-development/orbital-data-centers-activate-through-three-tier-launch-vehicle-sequence-rideshare-dedicated-starship.md
index ee1fa63a5..173642711 100644
--- a/domains/space-development/orbital-data-centers-activate-through-three-tier-launch-vehicle-sequence-rideshare-dedicated-starship.md
+++ b/domains/space-development/orbital-data-centers-activate-through-three-tier-launch-vehicle-sequence-rideshare-dedicated-starship.md
@@ -12,8 +12,12 @@ sourcer: Tech Startups
 related_claims: ["[[launch cost reduction is the keystone variable that unlocks every downstream space industry at specific price thresholds]]", "[[Starship achieving routine operations at sub-100 dollars per kg is the single largest enabling condition for the entire space industrial economy]]"]
 supports:
 - Starcloud
+- Google's Project Suncatcher research identifies $200/kg launch cost as the enabling threshold for gigawatt-scale orbital AI compute constellations, validating the tier-specific model where constellation-scale ODC requires Starship-class economics while proof-of-concept operates on Falcon 9
+- Orbital data centers are activating bottom-up from small-satellite proof-of-concept toward megaconstellation scale, with each tier requiring different launch cost gates rather than a single sector-wide threshold
 reweave_edges:
 - Starcloud|supports|2026-04-04
+- Google's Project Suncatcher research identifies $200/kg launch cost as the enabling threshold for gigawatt-scale orbital AI compute constellations, validating the tier-specific model where constellation-scale ODC requires Starship-class economics while proof-of-concept operates on Falcon 9|supports|2026-04-11
+- Orbital data centers are activating bottom-up from small-satellite proof-of-concept toward megaconstellation scale, with each tier requiring different launch cost gates rather than a single sector-wide threshold|supports|2026-04-11
 ---
 
 # Orbital data center deployment follows a three-tier launch vehicle activation sequence (rideshare → dedicated → constellation) where each tier unlocks an order-of-magnitude increase in compute scale
diff --git a/domains/space-development/space-based-solar-power-and-orbital-data-centers-share-infrastructure-making-odc-the-near-term-revenue-bridge-to-long-term-sbsp.md b/domains/space-development/space-based-solar-power-and-orbital-data-centers-share-infrastructure-making-odc-the-near-term-revenue-bridge-to-long-term-sbsp.md
index 559205db9..59a548d92 100644
--- a/domains/space-development/space-based-solar-power-and-orbital-data-centers-share-infrastructure-making-odc-the-near-term-revenue-bridge-to-long-term-sbsp.md
+++ b/domains/space-development/space-based-solar-power-and-orbital-data-centers-share-infrastructure-making-odc-the-near-term-revenue-bridge-to-long-term-sbsp.md
@@ -12,8 +12,10 @@ sourcer: TechCrunch / Aetherflux
 related_claims: ["[[the space manufacturing killer app sequence is pharmaceuticals now ZBLAN fiber in 3-5 years and bioprinted organs in 15-25 years each catalyzing the next tier of orbital infrastructure]]", "[[launch cost reduction is the keystone variable that unlocks every downstream space industry at specific price thresholds]]", "[[power is the binding constraint on all space operations because every capability from ISRU to manufacturing to life support is power-limited]]"]
 supports:
 - Aetherflux
+- Orbital data centers and space-based solar power share identical infrastructure requirements in sun-synchronous orbit creating a dual-use architecture where near-term compute revenue cross-subsidizes long-term energy transmission development
 reweave_edges:
 - Aetherflux|supports|2026-04-07
+- Orbital data centers and space-based solar power share identical infrastructure requirements in sun-synchronous orbit creating a dual-use architecture where near-term compute revenue cross-subsidizes long-term energy transmission development|supports|2026-04-11
 ---
 
 # Space-based solar power and orbital data centers share infrastructure making ODC the near-term revenue bridge to long-term SBSP
diff --git a/domains/space-development/spacex-1m-odc-filing-represents-vertical-integration-at-unprecedented-scale-creating-captive-starship-demand-200x-starlink.md b/domains/space-development/spacex-1m-odc-filing-represents-vertical-integration-at-unprecedented-scale-creating-captive-starship-demand-200x-starlink.md
index 5fe327e25..7341ae7c5 100644
--- a/domains/space-development/spacex-1m-odc-filing-represents-vertical-integration-at-unprecedented-scale-creating-captive-starship-demand-200x-starlink.md
+++ b/domains/space-development/spacex-1m-odc-filing-represents-vertical-integration-at-unprecedented-scale-creating-captive-starship-demand-200x-starlink.md
@@ -10,6 +10,10 @@ agent: astra
 scope: structural
 sourcer: SpaceNews
 related_claims: ["[[SpaceX vertical integration across launch broadband and manufacturing creates compounding cost advantages that no competitor can replicate piecemeal]]", "[[launch cost reduction is the keystone variable that unlocks every downstream space industry at specific price thresholds]]"]
+supports:
+- Orbital data center governance gaps are activating faster than prior space sectors as astronomers challenged SpaceX's 1M satellite filing before the public comment period closed
+reweave_edges:
+- Orbital data center governance gaps are activating faster than prior space sectors as astronomers challenged SpaceX's 1M satellite filing before the public comment period closed|supports|2026-04-11
 ---
 
 # SpaceX's 1 million orbital data center satellite filing represents vertical integration at unprecedented scale creating captive Starship demand 200x larger than Starlink
diff --git a/entities/space-development/aetherflux.md b/entities/space-development/aetherflux.md
index d3b558b3b..524e99e93 100644
--- a/entities/space-development/aetherflux.md
+++ b/entities/space-development/aetherflux.md
@@ -11,8 +11,10 @@ website:
 domain: space-development
 supports:
 - Breakthrough Energy Ventures' investment in Aetherflux's orbital solar infrastructure signals that space-based solar power has achieved credibility as a climate technology investment category at institutional investor level
+- Orbital data centers and space-based solar power share identical infrastructure requirements in sun-synchronous orbit creating a dual-use architecture where near-term compute revenue cross-subsidizes long-term energy transmission development
 reweave_edges:
 - Breakthrough Energy Ventures' investment in Aetherflux's orbital solar infrastructure signals that space-based solar power has achieved credibility as a climate technology investment category at institutional investor level|supports|2026-04-10
+- Orbital data centers and space-based solar power share identical infrastructure requirements in sun-synchronous orbit creating a dual-use architecture where near-term compute revenue cross-subsidizes long-term energy transmission development|supports|2026-04-11
 ---
 
 # Aetherflux