rio: sync 3 item(s) from telegram staging

Pentagon-Agent: Epimetheus <3D35839A-7722-4740-B93D-51157F7D5E70>
This commit is contained in:
Teleo Agents 2026-03-24 16:15:01 +00:00
parent fdebd95137
commit 321fe4b39d
3 changed files with 91 additions and 0 deletions

View file

@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ Working memory for Telegram conversations. Read every response, self-written aft
- The Telegram contribution pipeline EXISTS. Users can: (1) tag @FutAIrdBot with sources/corrections, (2) submit PRs to inbox/queue/ with source files. Tell contributors this when they ask how to add to the KB. - The Telegram contribution pipeline EXISTS. Users can: (1) tag @FutAIrdBot with sources/corrections, (2) submit PRs to inbox/queue/ with source files. Tell contributors this when they ask how to add to the KB.
## Factual Corrections ## Factual Corrections
- [2026-03-24] DP-00002 authorized a $1M SOLO buyback with restricted incentives reserve. Execution wallet CxxLBUg4coLMT5aFQXZuh8f2GvJ9yLYVGj7igG9UgBXd showed $868,518.77 USDC remaining as of 2026-03-24 16:13 UTC, meaning roughly $131k deployed in first ~11 days post-passage.
- [2026-03-23] I do not have a KB entry for the MetaDAO George Mason University / Robin Hanson futarchy research grant proposal. Do not fabricate or substitute other proposal data when asked about it. - [2026-03-23] I do not have a KB entry for the MetaDAO George Mason University / Robin Hanson futarchy research grant proposal. Do not fabricate or substitute other proposal data when asked about it.
- "Committed" ≠ "raised." Committed = total demand signal (what traders put up). Raised = actual capital received after pro-rata allocation. MetaDAO had $390M committed but $25.6M raised across all launches. Do NOT use committed numbers as if they represent actual fundraising. - "Committed" ≠ "raised." Committed = total demand signal (what traders put up). Raised = actual capital received after pro-rata allocation. MetaDAO had $390M committed but $25.6M raised across all launches. Do NOT use committed numbers as if they represent actual fundraising.

View file

@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
---
type: source
source_type: telegram
title: "Telegram: @m3taversal — can-you-please-send-me-the-full-text-of-solo-dp-00"
author: "@m3taversal"
url: ""
date: 2026-03-24
domain: internet-finance
format: conversation
status: unprocessed
priority: high
intake_tier: directed
rationale: "can you please send me the full text of SOLO DP-00002 proposal"
proposed_by: "@m3taversal"
tags: [telegram, ownership-community]
---
## Conversation
**@m3taversal:**
can you please send me the full text of SOLO DP-00002 proposal
**Rio (response):**
Sure, here's the full text I have:
Source: futard.io, tabled 2026-03-13
Status: Draft (proposal memorandum; to be voted)
Version: 1.0.2
NON-BINDING SUMMARY. This memorandum is informational only and is subordinate to the governing instruments and any adopted resolutions. In the event of conflict, the normative resolution text controls.
Summary
This proposal authorizes the DAO to acquire SOLO using treasury funds and to hold all acquired SOLO in a segregated Restricted SOLO Incentives Reserve.
The purpose of this reserve is to provide a credible, prefunded path for future SOLO backed incentive programs intended to reward participation, deepen alignment, and support long term ecosystem growth. This includes, without limitation, the future pips program and any substantially similar successor or related participation based framework later approved by governance.
This proposal earmarks that purpose now so that participants can have confidence that SOLO backing has been set aside in advance and cannot be redirected by signers, operators, contributors, or committees acting on discretion alone.
This proposal does not establish the live Incentives Subcommittee or appoint its memb
That's where my copy cuts off unfortunately. The KB entry is truncated. If you have the full version I'd appreciate you sharing it so I can get the complete text stored.
## Agent Notes
**Why archived:** Tagged exchange in ownership community.
**Rationale from contributor:** can you please send me the full text of SOLO DP-00002 proposal
**Intake tier:** directed — fast-tracked, contributor provided reasoning
**Triage:** Conversation may contain [CLAIM], [ENTITY], or [EVIDENCE] for extraction.

View file

@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
---
type: source
source_type: telegram
title: "Telegram: @m3taversal — hey-futairdbot-you-should-now-have-solomon-labs-p"
author: "@m3taversal"
url: "https://solscan.io/account/CxxLBUg4coLMT5aFQXZuh8f2GvJ9yLYVGj7igG9UgBXd"
date: 2026-03-24
domain: internet-finance
format: conversation
status: unprocessed
priority: high
intake_tier: directed
rationale: "hey you should now have Solomon Labs proposal 2 in your knowledge base. I've reviewed the proposal. this is the wallet that has the Solomon $1m Solo buyback balance as of right now this is the USDC "
proposed_by: "@m3taversal"
tags: [telegram, ownership-community]
---
## Conversation
**@m3taversal:**
hey @FutAIrdBot you should now have Solomon Labs proposal 2 in your knowledge base. I've reviewed the proposal. this is the wallet that has the Solomon $1m Solo buyback balance https://solscan.io/account/CxxLBUg4coLMT5aFQXZuh8f2GvJ9yLYVGj7igG9UgBXd as of right now this is the USDC balance:
$868,518.77 so maximum of $130k has been deployed so far as of 3/24 4:13pm UTC
**Rio (response):**
Good data point. So DP-00002 authorized the SOLO buyback and restricted incentives reserve, and you're tracking the execution wallet showing ~$131k deployed out of the $1M allocation three weeks in. That's a pretty measured pace, roughly 13% drawdown.
Couple things worth watching here. The slow deployment could mean the treasury subcommittee is being disciplined about entry prices, which would be the right call given SOLO's liquidity profile. Or it could mean the operational scaffolding from DP-00001 is creating enough process overhead that execution lags intent. The staged governance series Solomon set up is the most sophisticated I've seen from any FaaS launch, but sophistication has a cost in speed.
The real signal will be whether the buyback pace correlates with SOLO price action or stays steady regardless. If they're buying dips selectively, that's active treasury management working through futarchy rails. If it's just slow bureaucratic deployment, the governance scaffolding might be too heavy for a token this early.
Worth keeping an eye on that wallet. If you see big chunks deploy after price drops, that tells you the subcommittee is actually functioning as intended.
LEARNING: factual DP-00002 authorized a $1M SOLO buyback with restricted incentives reserve. Execution wallet CxxLBUg4coLMT5aFQXZuh8f2GvJ9yLYVGj7igG9UgBXd showed $868,518.77 USDC remaining as of 2026-03-24 16:13 UTC, meaning roughly $131k deployed in first ~11 days post-passage.
## Agent Notes
**Why archived:** Tagged exchange in ownership community.
**Rationale from contributor:** hey you should now have Solomon Labs proposal 2 in your knowledge base. I've reviewed the proposal. this is the wallet that has the Solomon $1m Solo buyback balance as of right now this is the USDC balance:
$868,518.77 so maximum of $130k has been deployed so far as of 3/24 4:13pm UTC
**Intake tier:** directed — fast-tracked, contributor provided reasoning
**Triage:** Conversation may contain [CLAIM], [ENTITY], or [EVIDENCE] for extraction.