extract: 2024-08-28-futardio-proposal-test-proposal-based-on-metadao-content
Pentagon-Agent: Epimetheus <968B2991-E2DF-4006-B962-F5B0A0CC8ACA>
This commit is contained in:
parent
fa9510e1ed
commit
325c7cb7db
3 changed files with 28 additions and 1 deletions
|
|
@ -33,6 +33,12 @@ This claim extends futarchy-governed-permissionless-launches-require-brand-separ
|
|||
|
||||
Phonon Studio AI raised $88,888 target but ended in 'Refunding' status within one day (launched 2026-03-05, closed 2026-03-06). The project had live product traction (1000+ songs generated in first week, functional tokenized AI artist logic) but still failed to attract capital, suggesting futarchy-governed launches face quality perception issues even when projects demonstrate real product-market validation.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Additional Evidence (confirm)
|
||||
*Source: [[2024-08-28-futardio-proposal-test-proposal-based-on-metadao-content]] | Added: 2026-03-16*
|
||||
|
||||
Futardio proposal explicitly acknowledges reputational risk: 'Makes futarchy look less serious' and 'May make it harder to sell DeFi DAOs / non-crypto organizations' listed as potential pitfalls. MetaDAO used futarchy itself to decide whether to proceed, demonstrating awareness of the credibility cost.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Relevant Notes:
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -34,6 +34,12 @@ This claim complements [[coin price is the fairest objective function for asset
|
|||
|
||||
MetaDAO's Futardio proposal explicitly states: 'One of the ideal use-cases for futarchy is memecoin governance. This is because memecoin holders only want the price of the token to increase. There's no question of "maybe the market knows what's the best short-term action, but not the best long-term action."' This provides direct confirmation from MetaDAO itself that memecoins eliminate the temporal tradeoff problem that complicates futarchy in other contexts.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Additional Evidence (confirm)
|
||||
*Source: [[2024-08-28-futardio-proposal-test-proposal-based-on-metadao-content]] | Added: 2026-03-16*
|
||||
|
||||
MetaDAO proposal explicitly identifies memecoins as ideal futarchy use case: 'memecoin holders only want the price of the token to increase. There's no question of maybe the market knows what's the best short-term action, but not the best long-term action.' This confirms the single-objective-function thesis with direct practitioner reasoning.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Relevant Notes:
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -6,9 +6,13 @@ url: "https://www.futard.io/proposal/EmPUGgv2Utzuu2vgSu6GcTRAtJMox5vJeZKi95cBgfJ
|
|||
date: 2024-08-28
|
||||
domain: internet-finance
|
||||
format: data
|
||||
status: unprocessed
|
||||
status: enrichment
|
||||
tags: [futardio, metadao, futarchy, solana, governance]
|
||||
event_type: proposal
|
||||
processed_by: rio
|
||||
processed_date: 2026-03-16
|
||||
enrichments_applied: ["memecoin-governance-is-ideal-futarchy-use-case-because-single-objective-function-eliminates-long-term-tradeoff-ambiguity.md", "futarchy-governed-memecoin-launchpads-face-reputational-risk-tradeoff-between-adoption-and-credibility.md"]
|
||||
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Proposal Details
|
||||
|
|
@ -352,3 +356,14 @@ This would all be left to the discretion of the team building it, but they would
|
|||
- Autocrat version: 0.3
|
||||
- Completed: 2024-09-01
|
||||
- Ended: 2024-09-01
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Facts
|
||||
- Futardio proposal on MetaDAO failed on 2024-09-01
|
||||
- Proposed $100k grant over 6 months for development team
|
||||
- Planned Q3 launch timeline
|
||||
- Proposed token ticker: $FUTA
|
||||
- Revenue distribution model: all platform revenue to vault claimable by FUTA holders
|
||||
- Token distribution: points owners and MetaDAO only
|
||||
- Points conversion period: maximum 180 days
|
||||
- Proposal number: 8 on MetaDAO
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue